Advertisement

Tourists’ City Trip Activity Program Planning: A Personalized Stated Choice Experiment

  • Astrid KempermanEmail author
  • Theo Arentze
  • Petr Aksenov
Chapter
Part of the Tourism, Hospitality & Event Management book series (THEM)

Abstract

New digital technologies support personalized recommender systems that can assist a tourist who wants to make a city tour. To develop a smart system that can give tourists an optimized complete activity program for their trip, it is not only important to know the preferences and interests of tourists but also whether they like combinations of activities/points of interest (POIs) or not. The aim of this study is to measure and predict tourists’ preferences for combinations of activities in planning a program during a city trip. A personalized stated choice experiment is developed and presented in a survey to a random sample of 238 respondents. Binary mixed logit models are estimated on the choice data collected. An advantage of this approach is that it allows estimation of covariances between city trip activities indicating whether they would act as complements or substitutes for a specific tourist in his/her city trip activity program. The model parameters provide information on combinations of activities and themes that tourists prefer during their city trip and that the recommender system can use to further fine-tune the recommendations of city trip programs and optimize the tourist experience.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Community’s Seventh Framework Program (FP7/2007–2013) under the Grant Agreement number 611040. The author is solely responsible for the information reported in this paper. It does not represent the opinion of the Community. The Community is not responsible for any use that might be made of the information contained in this paper.

References

  1. Aksenov, P., Kemperman, A. D. A. M., & Arentze, T. A. (2014). Toward personalized and dynamic cultural routing: A three-level approach. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 22, 257–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aksenov, P., Kemperman, A.D.A.M., Arentze, T.A. (2016). A personalized recommender system for tourists on city trips: concepts and implementation. In International Conference on Smart Digital Futures, KES International, Tenerife, Spain, 15–17 June.Google Scholar
  3. Andrada, I. I., Rogelio, T., Deng, J., Pierskalla, C., & Brooks, J. (2014). A conjoint approach in estimating the importance of urban forests versus other major tourism attractions in urban tourism destinations: Insights from Washington, DC. Tourism Analysis, 19, 301–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arentze, T., Kemperman, A., & Aksenov, P. (2018). Estimating a latent-class user model for travel recommender systems. Information Technology & Tourism, 19(1–4), 61–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baltas, G. (2007). Econometric models for discrete choice analysis of travel and tourism demand. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 21, 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhat, C. R. (2001). Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model. Transportation Research, 35B(7), 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borras, J., Moreno, A., & Valls, A. (2014). Intelligent tourism recommender systems: A survey. Expert Systems with Applications, 41, 7370–7389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryan, H. (1977). Leisure value system and recreational specialization: The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9, 174–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buhalis, D. (1998). Strategic use of information technologies in the tourism industry. Tourism Management, 19(5), 409–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Choi, A. S., Ritchie, B. W., Papandrea, F., & Bennett, J. (2010). Economic valuation of cultural heritage sites: a choice modeling approach. Tourism Management, 31(2), 213–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crouch, G.I. Louviere, J.J. (2000). A review of choice modelling research in tourism, hospitality, and leisure. Tourism Analysis, 5(2–4), 97–104(8).Google Scholar
  12. Dellaert, B. G. C., Arentze, T. A., & Horeni, O. (2013). Tourists’ mental representations of complex travel decision problems. Journal of Travel Research, 53, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gavalas, D., Konstantopolous, C., Mastakas, K., & Pantziou, G. (2014). Mobile recommender systems in tourism. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 39, 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gibson, H., & Yiannakis, A. (2002). Tourist roles, needs and the life course. Annals of Tourism Research, 29(2), 358–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gretzel, U., Mitsche, N., Hwang, Y. H., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2004). Tell me who you are and I will tell you where to go: Use of travel personalities in destination recommendation systems. Information Technology & Tourism, 7, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grigolon, A. B., Kemperman, A. D. A. M., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2012). The influence of low-fare airlines on vacation choices of students: Results of a stated portfolio choice experiment. Tourism Management, 33, 1174–1184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hensher, D. A., Rose, J. M., & Greene, W. H. (2015). Applied choice analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hergesell, A., & Dickinger, A. (2013). Environmentally friendly holiday transport mode choices among students: the role of price, time and convenience. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 21, 596–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huertas-Garcia, R., Laguna García, M., & Consolación, C. (2008). Conjoint analysis of tourist choice of hotel attributes presented in travel agent brochures. International Journal of Tourism Research, 16, 65–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jeng, J. M., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (1998). Destination compatibility in multidestination pleasure travel. Tourism Analysis, 3, 77–87.Google Scholar
  21. Kemperman, A. D. A. M., Borgers, A. W. J., Oppewal, H., & Timmermans, H. J. P. (2000). Consumer choice of theme parks: A conjoint choice model of seasonality effects and variety seeking behavior. Leisure Sciences, 22, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Morley, C. (2014). Discrete choice analysis and experimental design. In: L. Dwyer, A. Gill & N. Seetaram (Eds.) Handbook of research methods in tourism: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (pp. 113–126). Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  23. Nicolau, J. L. (2010). Variety-seeking and inertial behaviour: The disutility of distance. Tourism Economics, 16, 251–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nicolau, J. L., & Más, F. J. (2006). The influence of distance and prices on the choice of tourist destinations: The moderating role of motivations. Tourism Management, 27, 982–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oppewal, H., Huybers, T., & Crouch, G. I. (2010). How do Australians choose holiday destinations and experiences?. Gold Coast, Australia: CRC for Sustainable Tourism Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  26. Rodríguez, B., Molina, J., Pérez, F., & Caballero, R. (2012). Interactive design of personalised tourism routes. Tourism Management, 33(4), 926–940.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Román, C., & Martin, J. C. (2016). Hotel attributes: Asymmetries in guest payments and gains—A stated preference approach. Tourism Management, 52, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sarman, I., Scagnolari, S., & Maggi, R. (2015). Acceptance of life-threatening hazards among young tourists: A stated choice experiment. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 979–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steen Jacobsen, J. K., & Munar, A. M. (2012). Tourist information search and destination choice in a digital age. Tourism Management Perspectives, 1(1), 39–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tsaur, S. H., & Wu, D. H. (2005). The use of stated preference model in travel itinerary choice behaviour. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 18, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Vansteenwegen, P., Souffriau, W., Vanden Berghe, G., & Van Oudheusden, D. (2011). The city trip planner: An expert system for tourists. Expert Systems with Applications, 38, 6540–6546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Wörndl, W., Hefele, A. (2016). Generating paths through discovered places-of-interests for city trip planning. In: A. Inversini & R. Schegg (Eds.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism (pp. 441–453). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  33. Wörndl, W., & Hefele, A. (2017). Recommending a sequence of interesting places for tourist trip. Information Technology & Tourism, 17, 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yeh, D. Y., & Cheng, C. H. (2015). Recommendation system for popular tourist attractions in Taiwan using Delphi panel and repertory grid techniques. Tourism Management, 46, 164–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations