Destination Choice, Repeating Behaviour and the Tourist-Destination Life Cycle Hypothesis
Tourists develop important ties with particular destinations along their lives, resulting in a revisiting behaviour. In this paper we propose the tourist-destination life cycle (TDLC) hypothesis. The hypothesis states that tourist behaviour, choices and vacational experience change and evolve along the life cycle built between tourists and destinations. Increasing contacts turn into a deeper knowledge of the destination, leading to a new approach towards the vacational experience. In order to start testing for such a general hypothesis, we focus on a specific aspect of the tourist-destination relationship in this chapter. In particular, we are interested in better understanding if the role of factors driving repeating behaviour of tourists also change along the TDLC. In pursuing this objective, we employ econometric modelling techniques applied to empirical data for Spanish destinations like Quantile Regressions. Modelling approach combines variables from the repeating choice literature with those explaining attachment feelings of tourists and the tourist life cycle theory. Empirical findings of the model clearly give support to the TDLC hypothesis.
Prof. Andres Artal-Tur acknowledges financial support by Groups of Excellence of the Region of Murcia, Fundación Séneca, Science and Technology Agency, project 19884/GERM/15, and FEMISE Association (Project ENPI/2014/354-494) Research Projects FEM 41-04 and FEM 41-13.
Prof. Jaime Serra thanks receipt of FEDER funds, under the new PT2020 partnership agreement and by national funds FCT/MEC—Foundation for Science and Technology under the UID/HIS/00057/2013—POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007702 project CIDEHUS.
Prof. Antonia Correia thanks financial support from Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (Grant UID/ECO/04007/2013) and FEDER/COMPETE (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-007659).
- Alegre, J., & Garau, J. (2010). Place attachment in sund and sand destinations. Mimeo, Universitat de Ses Illes Balears (UIB). Google Scholar
- Artal-Tur, A., & Kozak, M. (2015). Destination competitiveness, the environment and sustainability: Challenges and cases. Wallingford, Oxfordshire: CAB International Publisher.Google Scholar
- Cooper, C., Fletcher, J., Fyall, A., Gilbert, D., & Wanhill, S. (2007). Tourism. Principles and practice (3rd ed.). United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Doyle, P. (1976). The realities of the product life cycle. Quarterly Review of Marketing, 1, 1–6.Google Scholar
- Egatur, (2013). Tourist expenditure survey for international tourism in Spain. Institute of Tourism Studies (IET), Ministry of Tourism, Madrid: Spain. Google Scholar
- Goldsmith, R. E., & Tsiotsou, R. H. (2012). Introduction to experiential marketing. In R. H. Tsiotsou & R. E. Goldsmith (Eds.), Strategic marketing in tourism services (pp. 207–214). Bingle, UK: Emerald.Google Scholar
- Hall, C. M., Gössling, S., & Scott, D. (Eds.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Tourism and Sustainability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Pearce, P. (1993). Fundamentals of tourist motivation. In D. Pearce & R. Butler (Eds.), Tourism research: Critiques and challenges (pp. 113–134). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840.Google Scholar
- Wooldridge, J. F. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar