Advertisement

Intelligent Systems in Everyday Work Practices: Integrations and Sociotechnical Calibrations

  • Christine T. WolfEmail author
  • Jeanette L. Blomberg
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

A key challenge to the implementation and adoption of intelligent machines in the workplace is their integration with situated work practices and organizational processes. We examine these issues through a qualitative field study in the domain of information technology (IT) services procurement, where highly-skilled IT architects spend considerable effort reading and digesting client RFPs to design technical solutions. Our field study focuses on the design and development of an intelligent tool meant to augment architects’ design work. Along with usability issues and curiosity about the tool’s underlying intelligent features, architects raised a number of questions about how the tool would be used in relation to other processes and workflows that comprised their design work. Our findings consider how intelligent systems are actors within a sociotechnical system and how new relations emerge through their introduction, raising questions for future intelligent system design and integration.

Keywords

Sociotechnical systems Human-intelligent systems collaboration Everyday work practices Workplace transformation Natural language processing IT services Requirements analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Thank you to the IT architects who graciously shared their time, energy, and insights during the field study. All opinions are our own and do not represent any institutional endorsement.

References

  1. 1.
    Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., Sandberg, J.A.C.: The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London (1994)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Davis, M.C., Challenger, R., Jayewardene, D.N.W., Clegg, C.W.: Advancing socio-technical systems thinking: a call for bravery. Appl. Ergon. 45(2A), 171–180 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cohen, M.D., March, J.G., Olsen, J.P.: A garbage can model of organizational choice. Adm. Sci. Q. 17(1), 1–25 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IBM ResearchAlmaden San JoseUSA

Personalised recommendations