Advertisement

Hexagonal Image Generation by Virtual Multi-grid-Camera

  • Robert MantheyEmail author
  • Danny Kowerko
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

The process of capturing of an image is realized by a two-dimensional plane composed of photosensitive elements of almost entirely rectangle shape in technical solutions. However, biological visual systems use almost entirely hexagonal shapes and theoretical research shows the advantages of them but also the lack of usable capturing devices. We address this problem and create a virtual multi-grid-camera to overcome the problem and make further research possible. We create some scenes with common known content to demonstrate the use and show some effects being the result of the different shapes.

Keywords

Hexagonal image processing Dataset generation Tessellation Biological visual systems Human visual system 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was partially accomplished within the project localizeIT (funding code 03IPT608X) funded by the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, Germany) in the program of Entrepreneurial Regions InnoProfile-Transfer.

References

  1. 1.
    He, X., Jia, W.: Hexagonal structure for intelligent vision. In: IEEE International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies, pp. 52–64. IEEE Press (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Golay, M.J.: Hexagonal parallel pattern transformations. Trans. Comput. 18(8), 733–740 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deutsch, E.: Thinning algorithms on rectangular, hexagonal, and triangular arrays. Commun. ACM 15(9), 827–837 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    He, X., Jia, W., Wu, Q., Hintz, T.: Parallel edge detection on a virtual hexagonal structure. In: Cérin, C., Li, K.-C. (eds.) GPC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4459, pp. 751–756. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72360-8_68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wüthrich, C., Stucki, P.: An algorithmic comparison between square- and hexagonal-based grids. Graph. Models Image Process. 53(4), 324–339 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Curcio, C.A., Kenneth, J., Sloan, R., Packer, O., Hendrickson, A.E., Kalina, R.E.: Distribution of cones in human and monkey retina: individual variability and radial asymmetry. Science 236(4801), 579–582 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Digital Image Processing, 3rd edn. Pearson, London (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Manthey, R., Conrad, S., Ritter, M.: A framework for generation of testsets for recent multimedia workflows. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2016. LNCS, vol. 9739, pp. 460–467. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40238-3_44CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Technical University of ChemnitzChemnizGermany

Personalised recommendations