Advertisement

Developing Intelligent Multimodal IVI Systems to Reduce Driver Distraction

  • Ahmed FarooqEmail author
  • Grigori Evreinov
  • Roope Raisamo
  • Arto Hippula
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

As research into autonomous vehicles gets mainstream, automobile manufacturers are trying to reinvent the ways we operate and interact with our vehicles. This is now more evident in the central instrument clusters than ever before. While some manufacturers are focusing on adding touchscreens to replace most in-vehicular infotainment (IVI) controls, others are trying to make the IVIS smarter and multimodal. Unfortunately, the lack of reliable tactile feedback for touchscreen interaction in IVI systems can be a major issue. Although this may not be a critical flaw in mobile device interaction, it can be a dangerous limitation for in-car systems where visual distraction can be fatal. For this reason, our research* is focused on exploring and developing new methods of providing tactile actuation using both vibrotactile and pneumatic feedback techniques.

Keywords

Human-systems integration Multimodal interaction 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by the Henry Ford Foundation grant.

References

  1. 1.
    Visual-Manual NHTSA Driver Distraction Guidelines for In-Vehicle Electronic Devices, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Department of Transportation (DOT), Doc No. 2014-21991Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Politis, L., Brewster, B., Pollick, F.: To beep or not to beep? Comparing abstract versus language-based multimodal driver displays. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Human Factors Computing System, pp. 3971–3980 (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Farooq, A.: Developing technologies to provide haptic feedback for surface based interaction in mobile devices. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tampere (2017). ISBN 978-952-03-0589-5Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lylykangas, J., et al.: Responses to visual tactile and visual–tactile forward collision warnings while gaze on and off the road. J. Trans. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 40, 68–77 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lederman, S.J., Klatzky, R.L.: Haptic perception: a tutorial. Atten. Percept. Psychophys. 71(7), 1439–1459 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salminen, K., et al.: Cold or hot? How thermal stimuli are related to human emotional system? In: Oakley, I., Brewster, S. (eds.) Haptic and Audio Interaction Design, HAID 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7989. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ahmed Farooq
    • 1
    Email author
  • Grigori Evreinov
    • 1
  • Roope Raisamo
    • 1
  • Arto Hippula
    • 1
  1. 1.Tampere Unit for Computer-Human Interaction (TAUCHI), Faculty of Communication SciencesUniversity of TampereTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations