Advertisement

“I’m Your Personal Co-Driver—How Can I Assist You?” Assessing the Potential of Personal Assistants for Truck Drivers

  • Jana FankEmail author
  • Markus Lienkamp
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

User acceptance is widely recognized as a major factor for predicting the intention to use a technical device. As such, personal assistants for truck drivers pose significant design and function challenges. Long, solitary hours and comprehensive interaction with the vehicle open various possibilities for an assistant’s service. Including drivers’ requirements early in development is hence beneficial. This paper describes the result of an online survey intended to assess truck drivers’ attitudes toward personal assistants in the truck cabin. Its authors investigate the potential and the predicted acceptance of personal conversation, virtual, or robotic agents as interaction partners. They furthermore analyze how hedonic and pragmatic attributes affect the intention to use these personal assistants.

Keywords

Personal assistant Virtual agents Social robots Truck drivers Online survey Pragmatic attributes Hedonic attributes 

Notes

Acknowledgements

As first author, Jana Fank initiated this article’s research idea, and contributed to the study design and data analysis. Markus Lienkamp made an essential contribution to the conception of the research project. He critically revised the paper with regard to important content and gave final approval of the version to be published. Special thanks goes to Ramon Tengel, who contributed to the study’s design. The research was conducted with basic research funds from the Institute of Automotive Technology, Technical University of Munich.

References

  1. 1.
    Forster, Y., Naujoks, F., Neukum, A.: Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. In: 28th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), pp. 365–372 (2017)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kraus, J.M., et al.: Human After All: Effects of mere presence and social interaction of a humanoid robot as a co-driver in automated driving. In: 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular (AutomotiveUI), pp. 129–134 (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Häuslschmid, R., von Bülow, M., Pfleging, B., Butz, A.: Supporting trust in autonomous driving. In: 22nd ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI), pp. 319–329 (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rothensee, M.: Psychological determinants of the acceptance of future ubiquitous computing applications. Berlin, Humboldt-University, Dissertation. Kovač, Hamburg (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: development and test. Decis. Sci. 27(3), 451–481 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Davis, F.F.: User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 38(3), 475–487 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    de Graaf, M.M.A., Allouch, S.B., van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Why would I use this in my home? A model of domestic social robot acceptance. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16(1), 1–59 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    BAG: Marktbeobachtung Güterverkehr: Auswertung der Arbeitsbedingungen in Güterverkehr und Logistik 2017-I. Available: https://bit.ly/2AaVwNN
  9. 9.
    Blanz, M.: Forschungsmethoden und Statistik für die Soziale Arbeit: Grundlagen und Anwendungen. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (2015)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Urban, J.M.D. Regressionsanalyse: Theorie, Technik und Anwendung, 4th edn. Vs Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evers, C.: Auswirkungen von Belastungen und Stress auf das Verkehrsverhalten von Lkw-Fahrern, Philosophische Fakultät, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Dissertation, Bonn (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zlotowski, J.A.: Understanding Anthropomorphism in the Interaction Between Users and Robots, HIT Lab NZ, University of Canterbury, Dissertation, Canterbury (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Stanton, J.M.: An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Pers. Psychol. 51(3), 709–725 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Automotive TechnologyTechnical University MunichGarchingGermany

Personalised recommendations