Advertisement

Does the Type of Visualization Influence the Mode of Cognitive Control in a Dynamic System?

  • Christine ChauvinEmail author
  • Farida Said
  • Sabine Langlois
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 903)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of a visualization system on the mode of cognitive control adopted in a navigation task. It relies on a driving simulator experiment. It uses data clustering methods, which help identify three patterns of in-vehicle data corresponding to three different modes of control. The study shows that Augmented Reality HUD supports drivers, since it contributes to avoiding the adoption of a scrambled mode of control. However, it promotes an opportunistic mode of control characterised by a higher but limited anticipation.

Keywords

Cognitive control modes Operator assistance Visualization system Augmented reality Data clustering 

References

  1. 1.
    Hollnagel, E.: Human reliability analysis – context and control. Academic Press, London (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hollnagel, E.: Simplification of complexity: the use of simulation to analyse the reliability of cognition. In: Reliability and Safety Assessment of Dynamic Process Systems, pp. 166–178. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ross, T., Burnett, G.: Evaluating the human–machine interface to vehicle navigation systems as an example of ubiquitous computing. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55, 661–674 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Medenica, Z., Kun, A.L., Paek, T., Palinko, O.: Augmented reality vs. street views: a driving simulator study comparing two emerging navigation aids. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services, pp. 265–274. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jose, R., Lee, G.A., Billinghurst, M.: A comparative study of simulated augmented reality displays for vehicle navigation. In: Proceedings of the 28th Australian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 40–48. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A.: Driving performance after self-regulated control transitions in highly automated vehicles. Hum. Factors 59, 1233–1248 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Chauvin
    • 1
    Email author
  • Farida Said
    • 2
  • Sabine Langlois
    • 3
  1. 1.Lab-STICC (UMR CNRS 6285)Université Bretagne SudLorientFrance
  2. 2.LMBA (UMR CNRS 6205), Université Bretagne SudLorientFrance
  3. 3.Renault, Research DepartmentIRT System X. TechnocentreGuyancourt CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations