Advertisement

Biorefinery pp 49-75 | Cite as

Analysis and Optimization of Multi-actor Biorefineries

  • Muhammad Tahir Ashraf
  • Ana Inés Torres
  • Jens Ejbye SchmidtEmail author
  • George Stephanopoulos
Chapter

Abstract

Designing a biorefinery involves the selection of the set of products and the technologies that will be used for processing a given set of biomass feedstocks. Biorefinery design methodologies have relied either in conventional conceptual process design, where the set of products and technologies under consideration is fixed, or on the optimization of processing networks where multiple products and technologies are considered and the best biomass-technology(ies)-product(s) set is found by solving a mathematical programming problem. Both approaches implicitly assume a single actor biorefinery; this is that conversion of biomass is carried out by the same facility. In this chapter, a novel framework for the analysis of biorefinery processes is discussed. The framework considers that, akin to the current petrochemical industry, the biomass-based industry should be designed as distributed multi-actor processes. The chapter starts by commenting on the current structure of the petrochemical industry and motivating the need for a distributed biomass-based industry. After reviewing the approaches commonly used for the design of biorefineries, the distributed framework developed by the authors is presented. The chapter ends by discussing a modified version of the framework useful for screening processes at early design stages.

Keywords

Biorefinery Biorefinery design Biorefinery network Multi-actor biorefineries Biorefinery optimization 

References

  1. AdvanSix: Products (2018) Chemical intermediates. https://www.advansix.com/chemicalintermediates/products/. Accessed 17 May 2018
  2. Aita GM, Kim M (2010) Pretreatment technologies for the conversion of lignocellulosic materials to bioethanol. Chapter 8. In: Sustainability of the sugar and sugar−ethanol industries, vol 1058, American Chemical Society, pp 117–145Google Scholar
  3. Ashraf MT (2017) Valorization of mixed lignocellulosic residues in the UAE using a biorefinery concept. Khalifa University of Science and Technology, Abu DhabiGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashraf MT, Schmidt JE (2018) Process simulation and economic assessment of hydrothermal pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis of multi-feedstock lignocellulose—separate vs combined processing. Bioresour Technol 249:835–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avantium (2018) YXY technology. https://www.avantium.com/yxy/yxy-technology/. Accessed 17 May 2018
  6. BASF (2018) Products and industries: chemicals. Chemicals. https://www.basf.com/en/products-and-industries/chemicals.html. Accessed 17 May 2018
  7. BP (2018a) Petrochemicals. Texas City Chemicals, Texas. https://www.bp.com/en_us/bp-us/what-we-do/petrochemicals/texas-city.html. Accessed 17 May 2018
  8. BP (2018b) Petrochemicals. Cooper River Chemicals, Cooper River. https://www.bp.com/en_us/bp-us/what-we-do/petrochemicals/cooper-river.html. Accessed 17 May 2018
  9. Cheali P, Gernaey KV, Sin G (2014) Toward a computer-aided synthesis and design of biorefinery networks: data collection and management using a generic modeling approach. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 2:19–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Douglas JM (1988) Conceptual design of chemical processes. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Dupont Tate & Lyle: Susterra (2018a) Life cycle analysis overview—Susterra® propanediol. http://www.duponttateandlyle.com/sites/default/files/Susterra(R)Propanediol-LCAOverview.pdf. Accessed 17 May 2018
  12. Dupont Tate & Lyle: FAQS (2018b) 1,3-propanediol FAQ. http://www.duponttateandlyle.com/faqs. Accessed 17 May 2018
  13. Dupont Tate & Lyle: Story (2018c) Our Story—DuPont and Tate & Lyle bio products. http://www.duponttateandlyle.com/our_story. Accessed 17 May 2018
  14. Dupont Tate & Lyle (2018d) History. https://www.tateandlyle.com/about-us/history. Accessed 17 May 2018
  15. Giuliano A, Cerulli R, Poletto M, Raiconi G, Barletta D (2016) Process pathways optimization for a lignocellulosic biorefinery producing levulinic acid, succinic acid, and ethanol. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:10699–10717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gong J, Garcia DJ, You F (2016) Unraveling optimal biomass processing routes from bioconversion product and process networks under uncertainty: an adaptive robust optimization approach. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 4:3160–3173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hallberg C, O’Connor D, Rushton M, Pye EK, Gjennstad G, Berlin A, et al (2012) Continuous counter-current organosolv processing of lignocellulosic feedstocks. US008772427B2Google Scholar
  18. Hernández-Calderón OM, Ponce-Ortega JM, Ortiz-Del-Castillo JR, Cervantes-Gaxiola ME, Milán-Carrillo J, Serna-González M et al (2016) Optimal design of distributed algae-based biorefineries using CO2 emissions from multiple industrial plants. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:2345–2358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IEA (2007) IEA bioenergy Task 42 on biorefineries: co-production of fuels, chemicals, power and materials from biomass. Minutes Third Task MeetGoogle Scholar
  20. Intelligen Inc. (2017) SuperPro(R) designerGoogle Scholar
  21. Kazi FK, Patel AD, Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA, Anex RP (2011) Techno-economic analysis of dimethylfuran (DMF) and hydroxymethylfurfural (HMF) production from pure fructose in catalytic processes. Chem Eng J 169:329–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. MatWeb: Material Property Data (2018) Nylon manufacturers, suppliers, and distributors. http://www.matweb.com/reference/Manufacturers.aspx?MatGroupID=17. Accessed 20 July 2018
  23. Murillo-Alvarado PE, Ponce-Ortega JM, Serna-Gonzalez M, Castro-Montoya AJ, El-Halwagi MM (2013) Optimization of pathways for biorefineries involving the selection of feedstocks, products, and processing steps. Ind Eng Chem Res 52:5177–5190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Packaging Getaway (2018) Coca-Cola’s 100% plant-based bottle. http://www.packaging-gateway.com/projects/coca-cola-plant-based-bottle/. Accessed 5 July 2018
  25. Patel AD, Serrano-Ruiz JC, Dumesic JA, Anex RP (2010) Techno-economic analysis of 5-nonanone production from levulinic acid. Chem Eng J 160:311–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peters MS, Timmerhaus KD, West R (2003) Plant design and economics for chemical engineers, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  27. Peters MW, Taylor JD, Jenni M, Manzer LE, Henton DE (n.d.) Integrated process to selectively convert renewable isobutanol to P-xyleneGoogle Scholar
  28. Pham V, El-Halwagi M (2012) Process synthesis and optimization of biorefinery configurations. AICHE J 58:1212–1221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ragauskas AJ, Beckham GT, Biddy MJ, Chandra R, Chen F, Davis MF et al (2014) Lignin valorization: improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 344:1246843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Seider WD, Seader JD, Lewin DR, Widagdo S (2008) Product and process design principles: synthesis, analysis and design, 3rd edn. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  31. The Coca Cola Company (2018a) PlantBottle. http://www.coca-colacompany.com/our-company/plantbottle. Accessed 17 May 2018
  32. The Coca Cola Company (2018b) PlantBottle basics. https://www.coca-colacompany.com/stories/plant-bottle-basics
  33. Torres AI, Stephanopoulos G (2016) Design of multi-actor distributed processing systems: a game-theoretical approach. AICHE J 62:3369–3391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Torres AI, Daoutidis P, Tsapatsis M (2010) Continuous production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural from fructose: a design case study. Energy Environ Sci 3:1560–1572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Torres AI, Tsapatsis M, Daoutidis P (2012) Biomass to chemicals: design of an extractive-reaction process for the production of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural. Comput Chem Eng 42:130–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Torres AI, Cybulska I, Fang C, Thomsen MH, Schmidt JE, Stephanopoulos G (2015) A novel approach for the identification of economic opportunities within the framework of a biorefinery. Comput Aided Chem Eng 37:1175–1180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. US-DOE (2018) Integrated biorefineries. https://energy.gov/eere/bioenergy/integrated-biorefineries. Accessed 17 May 2018
  38. Werpy T, Petersen G, Aden A, Bozell J, Holladay J, White J, et al (2004) Top value added chemicals from biomass (volume 1: results of screening for potential candidates from sugars and synthesis gas). 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Tahir Ashraf
    • 1
  • Ana Inés Torres
    • 2
  • Jens Ejbye Schmidt
    • 3
    Email author
  • George Stephanopoulos
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringKhalifa University of Science and TechnologyAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  2. 2.Instituto de Ingenieŕıa Qúımica, Facultad de Ingenieŕıa, Universidad de la RepúblicaMontevideoUruguay
  3. 3.SDC-Department of Chemical Engineering, Biotechnology, and Environmental TechnologyUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdense MDenmark
  4. 4.Department of Chemical EngineeringMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations