Advertisement

Humans and Big Data: New Hope? Harnessing the Power of Person-Centred Data Analytics

  • Carmel Martin
  • Keith Stockman
  • Joachim P. Sturmberg
Chapter

Abstract

Big data provide the hope of major health innovation and improvement. However, there is a risk of precision medicine based on predictive biometrics and service metrics overwhelming anticipatory human centered sense-making, in the fuzzy emergence of personalized (big data) medicine. This is a pressing issue, given the paucity of individual sense-making data approaches. A human-centric model is described to address the gap in personal particulars and experiences in individual health journeys. The Patient Journey Record System (PaJR) was developed to improve human-centric healthcare by harnessing the power of person-centred data analytics using complexity theory, iterative health services and information systems applications over a 10 year period. PaJR is a web-based service supporting usually bi-weekly telephone calls by care guides to individuals at risk of readmissions.

This chapter describes a case study of the timing and context of readmissions using human (biopsychosocial) particular data which is based on individual experiences and perceptions with differing patterns of instability. This Australian study, called MonashWatch, is a service pilot using the PaJR system in the Dandenong Hospital urban catchment area of the Monash Health network. State public hospital big data – the Victorian HealthLinks Chronic Care algorithm provides case finding for high risk of readmission based on disease and service metrics. Monash Watch was actively monitoring 272 of 376 intervention patients, with 195 controls over 22 months (ongoing) at the time of the study.

Three randomly selected intervention cases describe a dynamic interplay of self-reported change in health and health care, medication, drug and alcohol use, social support structure. While the three cases were at similar predicted risk initially, their cases represented different statistically different time series configurations and admission patterns. Fluctuations in admission were associated with (mal)alignment of bodily health with psychosocial and environmental influences. However human interpretation was required to make sense of the patterns as presented by the multiple levels of data.

A human-centric model and framework for health journey monitoring illustrates the potential for ‘small’ personal experience data to inform clinical care in the era of big data predominantly based on biometrics and medical industrial process. Unless the complex dynamics underpinning readmissions are understood, many efforts may be directed at disease rather than at whole patient journey systems including disease. Many new technologies will emerge to enhance health journeys. It is important that appropriate anticipatory models inform their development. in order to enhance human sense-making.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The collaboration in the development, trialling and evaluation of the PaJR project by our colleagues Narelle Hinkley and Donald Campbell at Monash University, Australia, Carl Vogel and Lucy Hederman at Trinity University, Dublin, Ireland and Kevin Smith and John-Paul Smith, University of Queensland is kindly acknowledged.

References

  1. 1.
    Oxford University P. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. The New Oxford dictionary of English; 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dimitrov DV. Medical internet of things and big data in healthcare. Healthc Inform Res. 2016;22(3):156–63.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Norbury A, Seymour B. Response heterogeneity: challenges for personalised medicine and big data approaches in psychiatry and chronic pain. F1000 Res. 2018;7:55.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollar D. Trajectory analysis in health care. New York: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith A. The big data revolution: from drug development to better health outcomes? Am J Manag Care. 2014;20(8 Spec No.):E4.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tilly C. The old new social history and the new old social history. Ann Arbor: Center for Research on Social Organization. Harvard; 2007.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kostkova P, Brewer H, de Lusignan S, Fottrell E, Goldacre B, Hart G, et al. Who owns the data? Open data for healthcare. Front Public Health. 2016;4:7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krumholz HM. Post-hospital syndrome—an acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):100–2.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lakoff G, Johnson M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 1980.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rosen R. Anticipatory systems: philosophical, mathematical, and methodological foundations. 1st ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press; 1985.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ellis GFR. Top-down causation and emergence: some comments on mechanisms. Interface Focus. 2012;2(1):126–40.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rothman KJ. Causes. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(6):587–92.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sturmberg JP. The personal nature of health. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009;15(4):766–9.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sturmberg JP. Health: a personal complex-adaptive state. In: Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, editors. Handbook of systems and complexity in health. New York: Springer; 2013. p. 231–42.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sturmberg JP, Picard M, Aron DC, Bennett JM, Bircher J, deHaven MJ, et al. The emergence of health - how top-down environmental and social contexts constrain bottom-up biological potentials. A consensus framework. Front. Med. 2019;6:59.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2019.00059.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dantzer R. Cytokine-induced sickness behavior: where do we stand? Brain Behav Immun. 2001;15(1):7–24.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McWhinney IR. An acquaintance with particulars …. Fam Med. 1989;21(4):296–8.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gorovitz S, MacIntyre A. Toward a theory of medical fallibility. J Med Philos. 1976;1(1):51–71.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jylhä M. What is self-rated health and why does it predict mortality? Towards a unified conceptual model. Soc Sci Med. 2009;69(3):307–16.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    DeSalvo KB, Jones TM, Peabody J, McDonald J, Fihn S, Fan V, et al. Health care expenditure prediction with a single item, self-rated health measure. Med Care. 2009;47(4):440–7.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. J Health Soc Behav. 1997;38(1):21–37.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lewis S. The two faces of generalism. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2014;19(1):1–2.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reeve J, Byng R. Realising the full potential of primary care: uniting the ‘two faces’ of generalism. Br J Gen Pract. 2017;67(660):292–3.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    May C, Montori VM, Mair FS. We need minimally disruptive medicine. BMJ. 2009;339:b2803.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
  26. 26.
    Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R. Polypharmacy and medicines optimisation. Making it safe and sound. London: The King’s Fund; 2013.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Burton C. Can we explain medically unexplained symptoms? Fam Pract. 2014;31(6):623–4.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    WHO. Ottawa charter for health promotion. First International Conference on Health Promotion. Ottawa, 21 November 1986. 1986: WHO/HPR/HEP/95.1. Available from, http://www.who.int/hpr/NPH/docs/ottawa_charter_hp.pdf.
  29. 29.
    A Primer on Precision Medicine: US National Library of Medicine; 2018. Available from, https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/precisionmedicine/precisionvspersonalized.
  30. 30.
    What is pharmacogenomics? US National Library of Medicine. 2018. Available from, https://ghr.nlm.nih.gov/primer/genomicresearch/pharmacogenomics.
  31. 31.
    Benyamini Y. Why does self-rated health predict mortality? An update on current knowledge and a research agenda for psychologists. Psychol Health. 2011;26(11):1407–13.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Ferrucci L, Giallauria F, Schlessinger D. Mapping the road to resilience: novel math for the study of frailty. Mech Ageing Dev. 2008;129(11):677–9.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gijzel SMW, van de Leemput IA, Scheffer M, Roppolo M, Olde Rikkert MGM, Melis RJF. Dynamical resilience indicators in time series of self-rated health correspond to frailty levels in older adults. J Gerontol Ser A. 2017;72(7):991–6.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heller DA, Ahern FM, Pringle KE, Brown TV. Among older adults, the responsiveness of self-rated health to changes in Charlson comorbidity was moderated by age and baseline comorbidity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(2):177–87.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Oosterveld SM, Kessels RP, Hamel R, Ramakers IH, Aalten P, Verhey FR, et al. The influence of co-morbidity and frailty on the clinical manifestation of patients with Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;42(2):501–9.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Lutomski JE, Baars MAE, Boter H, Buurman BM, den Elzen WPJ, Jansen APD, et al. [Frailty, disability and multi-morbidity: the relationship with quality of life and healthcare costs in elderly people]. Ned. Tijdschr. Geneeskd. 2014;158:A7297.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Geessink N, Schoon Y, van Goor H, Olde Rikkert M, Melis R. Frailty and quality of life among older people with and without a cancer diagnosis: findings from TOPICS-MDS. PLoS One. 2017;12(12):e0189648.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Haaksma ML, Vilela LR, Marengoni A, Calderon-Larranaga A, Leoutsakos JS, Olde Rikkert MGM, et al. Comorbidity and progression of late onset Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review. Plos One. 2017;12(5):e0177044.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Martin CM. Self-rated health: patterns in the journeys of patients with multi-morbidity and frailty. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(6):1010–6.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    MonashWatch: Keeping people healthy at home: Monash Health; 2016. Available from, http://monashhealth.org/page/monashwatch.
  41. 41.
    Martin CM, Vogel C, Grady D, Zarabzadeh A, Hederman L, Kellett J, et al. Implementation of complex adaptive chronic care: the Patient Journey Record system (PaJR). J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(6):1226–34.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Martin C, Sturmberg JP, Stockman K, Campbell D, Hederman L, Vogel C, et al. Supporting complex dynamic health journeys using conversation to avert hospital readmissions from the community: an ecological perspective incorporating interoception. In: Sturmberg J, editor. Putting systems and complexity science into practice. Cham: Springer; 2018.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ferrier D, Diver F, Corin S, McNair P, Cheng C. HealthLinks: incentivising better value chronic care in Victoria. Int J Integr Care. 2017;17(3):A129. Available from, https://www.ijic.org/articles/abstract/10.5334/ijic.3241/.
  44. 44.
    Staiger TO, Kritek PA, Blakeney EL, Zierler BK, O’Brien K, Ehrmantraut R. A conceptual framework for applying the anticipatory theory of complex systems to improve safety and quality in healthcare. In: Nadin M, editor. Anticipation and medicine. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 31–40.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Goldwater D, Dharmarajan K, McEwen BS, Krumholz HM. Is posthospital syndrome a result of hospitalization-induced allostatic overload? J Hosp Med. 2018;13(5).  https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2986.
  46. 46.
    Martin C, Hinckley N, Stockman K, Campbell D. Post-hospital syndrome (PHS) and potentially preventable hospitalizations (PPH) in adults. MonashWatch adult cohort patient telehealth journeys. JMIR Preprints 2018. Available from, http://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/11952.
  47. 47.
    Martin CM, Stockman K, Campbell D. Resilience, health perceptions, stressors and hospital admissions - observations from the real world of clinical care of unstable health journeys in Monash Watch (MW), Victoria, Australia. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24(6):1310–18.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rosen R. An interview with Robert Rosen. In: Rosen J, editor. (This is a corrected version [July 14, 2000], thanks to the help of Esther Wieringa). Available from, http://www.people.vcu.edu/~mikuleck/rsntpe.html1997.
  49. 49.
    Mikulecky DC. The emergence of complexity: science coming of age or science growing old? Comput Chem. 2001;25(4):341–8.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sturmberg JP. Knowledge translation in healthcare - towards understanding its true complexities; comment on “using complexity and network concepts to inform healthcare knowledge translation”. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018;7(5):455–8. Available from, http://ijhpm.com/article_3415.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carmel Martin
    • 1
  • Keith Stockman
    • 2
  • Joachim P. Sturmberg
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Nursing and Allied HealthMonash University, and Monash HealthClaytonAustralia
  2. 2.Operations Research and Projects, General Medicine ProgramMonash HealthClaytonAustralia
  3. 3.School of Medicine and Public HealthUniversity of NewcastleWamberalAustralia
  4. 4.International Society for Systems and Complexity Sciences for HealthWaitsfieldUSA

Personalised recommendations