Advertisement

What Can Knowledge-Creating Organisations Learn from Theatrical Improvisation?

  • Anna-Maija Nisula
  • Aino Kianto
  • Tatiana Andreeva
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 7)

Abstract

This chapter amplifies the understanding of organisational knowledge creation by examining the creation of new knowledge through the lens of improvisation. Such an approach views knowledge creation as a spontaneous process where thinking and action converge and underlines the synthesis of diverse actors’ knowledge and perspectives in a flexible and agile manner through their engagement in social practice. To increase understanding of knowledge creation as an improvisational capacity, we turn to a context in which improvisation is employed systematically: the world of theatre. We explore how and when improvisation is utilised among theatre groups in their creative processes and associate forms of theatrical improvisation with three types of knowledge creation. The chapter enriches knowledge management literature by providing alternative models of knowledge creation, and also contributes to the emerging literature on arts-based management.

Keywords

Knowledge creation Improvisation Theatrical improvisation Devising theatre Improvisational theatre Arts-based methods 

References

  1. Andreeva, T. (2008). Can organizational change be planned and controlled? Evidence from Russian companies. Human Resource Development International, 11(2), 119–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Argote, L., McEvily, B., & Reagans, R. (2003). Managing knowledge in organizations: An integrative framework and review of emerging themes. Management Science, 49(4), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barret, F. J. (1998). Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, 9(5), 605–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barry, D., & Meisiek, S. (2010). Seeing more and seeing differently: Sensemaking, mindfulness, and the workarts. Organization Studies, 31(11), 1505–1530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bigley, G. A., & Roberts, K. H. (2001). The incident command system: High-reliability organizing for complex and volatile task environments. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1281–1299.Google Scholar
  6. Ciborra, C. U. (1996). The platform organization: Recombining strategies, structures, and surprises. Organization Science, 7(2), 103–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, S. D., & Brown, J. S. (1999). Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing. Organization Science, 10(4), 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crossan, M. M. (1998). Improvisation in action. Organization Science, 9(5), 593–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W., & White, R. E. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cunha, M. P., Cunha, J. V., & Kamoche, K. (1999). Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, 1(3), 299–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
  13. Drinko, C. (2013). Theatrical improvisation, consciousness, and cognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Easterby-Smith, M. (1991). An introduction. In M. Easterby-Smith, R. Thorpe, & A. Lowe (Eds.), Management research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Erden, Z., Von Krogh, G., & Nonaka, I. (2008). The quality of group tacit knowledge. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(1), 4–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. (2016). Qualitative methods in business research: A practical guide to social research (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  17. Fisher, C. M., & Amabile, T. (2009). Creativity, improvisation and organizations. In T. Rickards, M. A. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity (pp. 13–24). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Frost, A., & Yarrow, R. (1980). Improvisation in drama. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fuller, D., & Magerko, B. (2010, June). Shared mental models in improvisational performance. In Proceedings of the intelligent narrative technologies III workshop (p. 15), ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative theory. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  21. Gourlay, S. (2006). Conceptualizing knowledge creation: A critique of Nonaka’s theory. Journal of Management Studies, 43(7), 1415–1436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S2), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  24. Hadida, A. L., Tarvainen, W., & Rose, J. (2014). Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17(4), 437–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hargadon, A. B., & Bechky, B. A. (2006). When collections of creatives become creative collectives: A field study of problem solving at work. Organization Science, 17(4), 484–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Harrison, D. A., & Klein, K. J. (2007). What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1199–1228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harvey, S. (2014). Creative synthesis: Exploring the process of extraordinary group creativity. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 324–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harvey, S., & Kou, C. Y. (2013). Collective engagement in creative tasks: The role of evaluation in the creative process in groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(3), 346–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hayek, F. A. (1945). The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, 35(4), 519–530.Google Scholar
  30. Hmieleski, K. M., & Corbett, A. C. (2006). Proclivity for improvisation as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(1), 45–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Houston, M. J., & Sudman, S. (1975). A methodological assessment of the use of key informants. Social Science Research, 4(2), 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Johnstone, K. (1981). Impro – Improvisation and the theatre, Methuen drama (first published June 18th 1979). London: Eyre Methuen.Google Scholar
  33. Kamoche, K., Pina, E., & Cunha, M. (2008). Improvisation and knowledge: The challenge of appropriation. Management Research: Journal of the Iberoamerican Academy of Management, 6(2), 93–106.Google Scholar
  34. Kanter, R. (2002). Strategy as improvisational theatre. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 75–81.Google Scholar
  35. Kellogg, K. C., Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (2006). Life in the trading zone: Structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Koppett, K. (2002). Training using drama: Successful development techniques from theatre & improvisation. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
  37. Kurtzberg, T. R., & Amabile, T. M. (2001). From Guilford to creative synergy: Opening the black box of team-level creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 13(3–4), 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leybourne, S. A. (2009). Improvisation and agile project management: A comparative consideration. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 2(4), 519–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKnight, B., & Bontis, N. (2002). E-improvisation: Collaborative groupware technology expands the reach and effectiveness of organizational improvisation. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Meisiek, S. (2004). Which catharsis do they mean? Aristotle, Moreno, Boal and organization theatre. Organization Studies, 25(5), 797–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Montuori, A. (2003). The complexity of improvisation and the improvisation of complexity: Social science, art and creativity. Human Relations, 56(2), 237–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moorman, C., & Miner, A. S. (1998). The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. The Journal of Marketing, 62, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nemeth, C. J. (1997). Managing innovation: When less is more. California Management Review, 40(1), 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nisula, A. M. (2013). Building organizational creativity – A multitheory and multilevel approach for understanding and stimulating organizational creativity. Acta Universitatis Lappeenrantaensis. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-265-539-4
  46. Nisula, A.-M., & Kianto, A. (2018). Stimulating organisational creativity with theatrical improvisation. Journal of Business Research, 85, 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nonaka, I. (1991). The knowledge creating company. Harvard Business Review, 69, 96–104.Google Scholar
  48. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. Oxford: Oxford university press. ISBN9780195092691.Google Scholar
  50. Nonaka, I., & Toyama, R. (2003). The knowledge-creating theory revisited: Knowledge creation as a synthesizing process. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 1(1), 2–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nonaka, I., & Von Krogh, G. (2009). Perspective—Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: Controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science, 20(3), 635–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Nonaka, I., Byosiere, P., Borucki, C. C., & Konno, N. (1994). Organizational knowledge creation theory: A first comprehensive test. International Business Review, 3(4), 337–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Nagata, A. (2000). A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: A new perspective on the theory of the firm. Industrial and Corporate Change, 9(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oddey, A. (2013). Devising theatre: A practical and theoretical handbook. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Orlikowski, W. J. (1996). Improvising organizational transformation over time: A situated change perspective. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 63–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Orlikowski, W. J. (2002). Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organization Science, 13(3), 249–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Palmer, I., & Dunford, R. (2008). Organizational change and the importance of embedded assumptions. British Journal of Management, 19, s1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pina, E., Cunha, M., & Vieira Da Cunha, J. (2003). Organizational improvisation and change: Two syntheses and a filled gap. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 16(2), 169–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Prins, S. (2006). The psychodynamic perspective in organizational research: Making sense of the dynamics of direction setting in emergent collaborative processes. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79(3), 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sawyer, R. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 12–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sawyer, R. K., & DeZutter, S. (2009). Distributed creativity: How collective creations emerge from collaboration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(2), 81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schiuma, G. (2011). The value of arts for business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Singh, S., & Sonnenburg, S. (2012). Brand performances in social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(4), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Spolin, V. (1977). Improvisation for the theatre. A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Stacey, R. (2000). The emergence of knowledge in organization. Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2(4), 23–39.Google Scholar
  66. Swart, J., & Harvey, P. (2011). Identifying knowledge boundaries: The case of networked projects. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(5), 703–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Taylor, S. S., & Carboni, I. (2008). Technique and practices from the arts: Expressive verbs, feelings, and action. In The Sage handbook of new approaches to organizational studies (pp. 220–228). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tsoukas, H. (2003). Forms of knowledge and forms of life in organized contexts. In In the realm of organisation (pp. 52–76). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  69. Tsoukas, H., & Chia, R. (2002). On organizational becoming: Rethinking organizational change. Organization Science, 13(5), 567–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies, 25, 727–749.Google Scholar
  71. Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2005). Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, 16(3), 203–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Weick, K. E. (1993). Organizational redesign as improvisation. In Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance (pp. 346–379). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Weick, K. E. (1996). Enactment and the boundaryless career: Organizing as we work. In The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era (pp. 40–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Weick, K. E. (1998). Introductory essay—Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Weick, K., & Quinn, R. (1999). Organisational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Weick, K. E., & Roberts, K. H. (1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 357–381.Google Scholar
  77. Zack, M. H. (2000). Jazz improvisation and organizing: Once more from the top. Organization Science, 11(2), 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zheng, Y., Venters, W., & Cornford, T. (2011). Collective agility, paradox and organizational improvisation: The development of a particle physics grid. Information Systems Journal, 21(4), 303–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anna-Maija Nisula
    • 1
  • Aino Kianto
    • 1
  • Tatiana Andreeva
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLUT UniversityLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.Maynooth University School of BusinessMaynooth UniversityMaynoothIreland

Personalised recommendations