Advertisement

Clay Workshops as a Method for Recognising and Creating Individual Knowledge

  • Päivimaria Seppänen
  • Anne Pässilä
  • Aino Kianto
Chapter
Part of the Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning book series (IAKM, volume 7)

Abstract

This chapter discusses how a clay workshop can be used as an inquiry method in the knowledge management context. We focus on transdisciplinarity as an essential part of the knowledge creation process and clay workshop as an artistic approach for enabling knowledge production that takes place in collaboration among different disciplines. We demonstrate empirically how a series of clay workshops enabled individuals to recognise their personal tacit knowledge and how it supported knowledge creation in a work context. The study contributes to the literature on the interface of knowledge management, and the arts from a practitioner perspective, the study provides guidelines on how embodied methods, such as, for example, clay crafting, can be used for making sense and surfacing tacit knowledge.

Keywords

Tacit knowledge Knowledge creation Transdisciplinarity Transdisciplinary knowledge Arts-based methods Knowledge management 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a 1-year grant from the Finnish Cultural Foundation’s South Karelia Regional Fund, and it is part of the Arts Equal project funded by the Academy of Finland’s Strategic Research Council from its Equality in Society–programmed (project no. 293199).

References

  1. Aita, V., McIlvain, H., Susman, J., & Crabtree, B. (2003). Using metaphor as a qualitative analytic approach to understand complexity in primary care research. Qualitative Health Research, 13(10), 1419–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriessen, D., & Gubbins, C. (2009). Metaphor analysis as an approach for exploring theoretical concepts: The case of social capital. Organization Studies, 30(8), 845–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berthoin Antal, A. (2009). Transforming organisations with the arts (Research Report). TILLT Europe 2009. Retrieved from https://www.wzb.eu/system/files/docs/dst/wipo/researchreport.pdf
  4. Berthoin Antal, A., & Strauss, A. (2014). Not only art’s task-narrating bridges between unusual experiences with art and organizational identity. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 30(1), 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratianu, C., & Andriessen, D. (2008). Knowledge as energy: A metaphorical analysis. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM (pp. 75–82). Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  6. Bratianu, C., & Orzea, I. (2010). Organizational knowledge creation. Management & Marketing, 5(3), 41–62.Google Scholar
  7. Bürgi, P. T., Jacobs, C. D., & Roos, J. (2005). From metaphor to practice in the crafting of strategy. Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlucci, D., & Schiuma, G. (2014). Organizational climate as a driver: Health care workers’ perceptions of a large hospital. Journal of Health Management, 16(4), 583–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clandinin, D. J. (2013). Engaging in narrative inquiry. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast.Google Scholar
  10. Eales, L., & Peers, D. (2016). Moving adapted physical activity: The possibilities of arts-based research. Quest, 68(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Evans, K., & Kersh, N. (2004). Recognition of tacit skills and knowledge: Sustaining learning outcomes in workplace environments. Journal of Workplace Learning, 16(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heidegger, M., & Kupiainen, R. (2000). Oleminen ja aika. Vastapaino, Tampere. Repr edn: Sein und Zeit, 1927.Google Scholar
  13. Küpers, W. (2005). Phenomenology of embodied implicit and narrative knowing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 9(6), 114–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Küpers, W. (2013). A phenomenology of embodied senses: The ‘making’ of sense in organisational culture. International Journal of Work Organisation and Emotion, 5(4), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Leavy, P. (2008). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  16. Lievre, P., & Tang, J. (2015). SECI and inter-organizational and intercultural knowledge transfer: A case-study of controversies around a project of co-operation between France and China in the health sector. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(5), 1069–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nicolescu, B. (2010). Methodology of transdisciplinarity – Levels of reality, logic of the included middle and complexity. Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Sciences, 1(1), 19–38.Google Scholar
  18. Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nonaka, I. (1998). The concept of ba`: Building a foundation for knowledge creation. California Management Review, 40(3), 40–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creating company: How Japanese companies create the dynamics of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Boysiére, P. (2001). A theory of organizational knowledge creation: Understanding the dynamic process of creating knowledge. In M. Dierkes, A. Berthoin Antal, J. Child, & I. Nonaka (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge (pp. 491–517). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Oguz, F., & Sengun, E. (2011). Mystery of the unknown: Revisiting tacit knowledge in the organizational literature. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(3), 445–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pässilä, A., Uotila, T., & Melkas, H. (2013). Facilitating future-oriented collaborative knowledge creation by using artistic organizational innovation methods: Experiences from a Finnish wood-processing company. Futures, 47, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pässilä, A., Owens, A., & Pulkki, M. (2016). Learning jam: An evaluation of the use of arts-based initiatives to generate polyphonic understanding in work-based learning. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 6(2), 178–192. Retrieved from  https://doi.org/10.1108/HESWBL-01-2016-0006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Polanyi, M. (1983). The tacit dimension (Repr ed.). Gloucester, MA: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenfield, P. L. (1992). The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Social Science & Medicine, 35(11), 1343–1357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Samara, K. (2007). A framework for discovering knowledge management forces. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 8(1). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=983309
  28. Schiuma, G. (2009). The managerial foundations of knowledge assets dynamics. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 7(4), 290–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schiuma, G. (2011). The value of arts for business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schiuma, G., & Carlucci, D. (2016). Assessing the business impact of arts-based initiatives. In U. Sköldberg Johansson, J. Woodilla, & A. Berthoin Antal (Eds.), Artistic interventions in organizations: Research, theory and practice (pp. 60–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Schmitt, R. (2005). Systematic metaphor analysis as a method of qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 10(2), 358–394.Google Scholar
  32. Strauss, A. (2018). Value-creation processes in artistic interventions and beyond: Engaging conflicting orders of worth. Journal of Business Research, 85, 540–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Taylor, S. S., & Ladkin, D. (2009). Understanding arts-based methods in managerial development. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(1), 55–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taylor, S. S., & Statler, M. (2014). Material matters: Increasing emotional engagement in learning. Journal of Management Education, 38(4), 586–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Virtanen, I. (2011). Externalization of tacit knowledge implies a simplified theory of cognition. Journal of Knowledge Management Practice, 12(3).Google Scholar
  36. Wagner, C. S., Roessner, J. D., Bobb, K., Klein, J. T., Boyack, K. W., Keyton, J., et al. (2011). Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (IDR): A review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang, Z., Wang, N., & Liang, H. (2014). Knowledge sharing, intellectual capital and firm performance. Management Decision, 52(2), 230–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weinstein, J., & Ventres, W. (2000). Mini-ethnography: Meaningful exploration made easy. Family Medicine, 32(9), 600–602.Google Scholar
  39. Zaltman, G. (1996). Metaphorically speaking. Marketing Research, 8(2), 13.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Päivimaria Seppänen
    • 1
  • Anne Pässilä
    • 2
  • Aino Kianto
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Business and ManagementLUT UniversityLappeenrantaFinland
  2. 2.School of Engineering ScienceLUT UniversityLappeenrantaFinland

Personalised recommendations