Advertisement

10 The Demography of Sexuality

  • Amanda K. BaumleEmail author
  • Ben Dreon
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research book series (HSSR)

Abstract

In recent years, there has been a remarkable shift in the quantity of research conducted on population sexuality, as well as the type of questions demographers are asking about sexuality. In this chapter, we describe the development of the demography of sexuality, including how changes in data availability and sociopolitical pressures have driven sexuality research. In particular, we focus on population-based research that is centered on sexual identity, behavior, or desire. In addition, we take a closer look at research conducted on non-heterosexual populations to describe some of the methodological issues and the primary findings that have emerged across the areas of prevalence, spatial distribution, labor market outcomes, and family. We then describe some of the challenges that remain for this area of research, including new research trajectories, needed data, and underexamined populations.

Keywords

Sexuality Sexual identity Sexual behavior Sexual desire LGBT Heterosexual 

References

  1. Badgett, M. V. L. (1995). The wage effects of sexual orientation discrimination. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(4), 726–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badgett, M.V. L., Baumle, A. K., Kravich, S., Romero, A. P., & Sears, R. B. (2009). The impact on Maryland’s budget of allowing same-sex couples to marry. University of Maryland Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class, 7, 295–339.Google Scholar
  3. Baumle, A. K. (2009). The cost of parenthood: Unraveling the effects of sexual orientation and gender on income. Social Science Quarterly, 90, 983–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumle, A. K. & Compton, D. R. (2014). Identity versus identification: How LGBTQ parents identify their children on census surveys. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76, 94–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumle, A. K., Compton, D. R., & Poston, D. L. (2009). Same-sex partners: The social demography of sexual orientation. Albany, NY: State University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Baumle, A. K. & Poston, D. L. (2011). The economic cost of being homosexual: A multilevel analysis. Social Forces, 89, 1005–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumle, A. K. & Compton, D. R. (2011). Legislating the family: The effect of state family laws on the presence of children in same-sex households. Law & Policy, 33, 82–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carpenter, C. (2013). The prevalence of gay men and lesbians. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 217–228). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carpenter, Christopher & Gary Gates. 2008. Gay and lesbian partnership: Evidence from California. Demography 45, 573–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. DiBennardo, R. & Gates, G. (2013). U.S. Census same-sex couple data: Adjustments to reduce measurement error and empirical implications. Population Research and Policy Review, 33, 603–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Durso, L. & Gates, G. (2013). Best practices: Collecting and analyzing data on sexual minorities. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 21–42). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gates, G. J. (2009). Same-sex spouses and unmarried partners in the American Community Survey, 2008. Resource document. Williams Institute Report. www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/pdf/ACS2008_Final(2).pdf Accessed 1 March 2009.
  13. Gates, G. J. (2013a). LGBT parenting in the United States. Resource Document. Williams Institute Report. http://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/LGBT-Parenting.pdf Accessed 29 January 2018.
  14. Gates, G. (2013b). Geography of the LGBT population. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 229–242). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Herek, G. M. (1991). Stigma, prejudice and violence against lesbians and gay men. In J.C. Gonsiorek & J. Weinrich (Eds.), Homosexuality: Research implications for public policy (pp. 60–80). Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  16. Klawitter, M. A. (2015). Meta-analysis of the effects of sexual orientation on earnings. Industrial Relations, 54, 4–32.Google Scholar
  17. Klawitter, M. & Flatt, V. (1998). The effects of state and local antidiscrimination policies on earnings for gays and lesbians. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 17(4), 658–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  19. Lewis, G. B. (2010). Modeling nonprofit employment: Why do so many lesbians and gay men work for nonprofit organizations? Administration & Society, 42, 720–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Meadow, T. (2013). Queer numbers: Social science as cultural heterosexism. Presented at American Sociological Association’s Annual Meeting, New York City, NY. August 12. http://socialinqueery.com/2013/08/14/queer-numbers-social-science-as-cultural-heterosexism/
  21. Meier, S. C., & Labuski, C. M. (2013). The demographics of the transgender population. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 289–327). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Michaels, S., & Giami, A. (1999). Sexual acts and sexual relationships: Asking about sex in surveys. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 63(3), 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peplau, L. A. & Fingerhut, A. (2004). The paradox of the lesbian worker. Journal of Social Issues, 60(4), 719–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Plug, E., Webbink, D. & Martin, N. (2014). Sexual orientation, prejudice, and segregation. Journal of Labor Economics, 32(1), 123–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Poston, D. L. & Baumle, A. K. (2010). Patterns of asexuality in the United States. Demographic Research, 23, 509–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Poston, D. L., Baumle, A. K., & Micklin, M. (2005). Needed research in demography. In D. L. Poston & M. Micklin (Eds.), Handbook of Population (pp. 853–881). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Poston, D. L., Compton, D. R., Xiong, Q., & Knox, E. A. (2017). The residential segregation of same-sex households from different-sex households in metropolitan USA, circa-2010. Population Review 56, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rault, W. & Hargrett, E. (2017). Sectors of activity and occupations of gays and lesbians in a union: A smaller gender divide. Population, English edition, 72(3), 385–417.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenfeld, M. J. (2014). Couple longevity in the era of same-sex marriage in the United States. Journal of Marriage and Family, 76(5), 905–918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schilt, K. & Bratter, J. (2015). From multiracial to transgender? Assessing attitudes toward a transgender category on the U.S. Census. TSQ: Transgender Studies Quarterly (Special Issue: Making Transgender Count), 2(1), 77–100.Google Scholar
  31. The GenIUSS Group. (2014). Best practices for asking questions to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents on population-based surveys. J.L. Herman (Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Tilcsik, A., Anteby, M., & Knight, C. R. (2015). Concealable stigma and occupational segregation: Toward a theory of gay and lesbian occupations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 60(3), 446–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ueno, K., Roach, T., & Peña-Talamantes, A. E. (2013). Sexual orientation and gender typicality of the occupation in young adulthood. Social Forces, 92(1), 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walther, C. S. & Poston, D. L. (2004). Patterns of gay and lesbian partnering in the larger metropolitan areas of the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 41, 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Westbrook, L. & Saperstein, A. (2015). New categories are not enough: Rethinking the measurement of sex and gender in social surveys. Gender & Society, 29, 534–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyUniversity of OregonEugeneUSA

Personalised recommendations