Advertisement

Introducing the Internet of Toys

  • Giovanna MascheroniEmail author
  • Donell Holloway
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Childhood and Youth book series (SCY)

Abstract

This introduction aims to contextualise the Internet of Toys (IoToys) within the tradition of media and communications, set out the theoretical foundations for this volume and explore the notions of mediatization, datafication and robotification. First, it makes the argument that IoToys should be conceived of as media that are triply articulated in children’s everyday lives. Their network connectivity and sensor-based functions provide the basis for the mediatization and datafication of children’s lives. Second, it analyses IoToys as toys that enable forms of hybrid play and embedded play and as social robots that are automated in such a way that they elicit social responses from or interaction with children. Finally, it provides a summary of the chapters of the book.

Keywords

Internet of Toys Mediatization Datafication Robotification Social robots 

References

  1. Barassi, V. (2017). BabyVeillance? Expecting parents, online surveillance and the cultural specificity of pregnancy apps. Social Media + Society, 3(2).  https://doi.org/10.1177/205630511770718.
  2. Belpaeme, T., Baxter, P., De Greeff, J., Kennedy, J., Read, R., Looije, R., … Zelati, M. C. (2013). Child-robot interaction: Perspectives and challenges. Paper presented at the International Conference on Social Robotics.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Breazeal, C. (2003). Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Breazeal, C., Harris, P. L., DeSteno, D., Kory Westlund, J. M., Dickens, L., & Jeong, S. (2016). Young children treat robots as informants. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(2), 481–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunz, M., & Meikle, G. (2018). The internet of things. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chaudron, S., Di Gioia, R., Gemo, M., Holloway, D., Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., … Yamada-Rice, D. (2017). Kaleidoscope on the internet of toys—Safety, security, privacy and societal insights. Ispra: Joint Research Centre. Retrieved from http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC105061/jrc105061_final_online.pdf.
  8. Connected Toys. (n.d.). Trends. Retrieved from http://www.ala.org/tools/future/trends/connectedtoys.
  9. Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Coulton, P. (2015). Playful and gameful design for the internet of things. In A. Niholt (Ed.), More playful user interfaces (pp. 151–173). Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55(1), 93–128.Google Scholar
  12. Cukier, K. N., & Mayer-Schoenberger, V. (2013). The rise of big data how it’s changing the way we think about the world. Foreign Affairs. Retrieved February 7, 2018, from https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2013–04-03/rise-big-data.
  13. Daily, S. B., James, M. T., Cherry, D., Porter, J. J., Darnell, S. S., Isaac, J., & Roy, T. (2017). Affective computing: Historical foundations, current applications, and future trends. In M. Jeon (Ed.), Emotions and affect in human factors and human–computer interaction (pp. 213–231). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demir, K. A., Caymaz, E., & Elci, M. (2017). Issues in integrating robots into organizations. Paper presented at the The 12th International Scientific Conference “Defence Resources Management in the 21st Century”, Brazov.Google Scholar
  15. Duffy, B. (2004). Robots social embodiment in autonomous mobile robotics. International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, 1(3), 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, M. (2015). Rise of the robots: Technology and the threat of a jobless future. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Franceschi-Bicchierai, L. (2017, February 27). Internet of things teddy bear leaked 2 million parent and kids message recordings. Motherboard. Retrieved December 22, 2017, from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/pgwean/internet-of-things-teddy-bear-leaked-2-million-parent-and-kids-message-recordings.
  18. Haddon, L., & Silverstone, R. (2000). Information and communication technologies and everyday life: Individual and social dimensions. In K. Ducatel, J. Webster, & W. Herrman (Eds.), The information society in Europe: Work and life in an age of globalization (pp. 233–258). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  19. Hartmann, M. (2006). The triple articulation of ICTs. Media as technological objects, symbolic environments and individual texts. In T. Berker, M. Hartmann, Y. Punie, & K. Ward (Eds.), Domestication of media and technology (pp. 80–102). Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hinske, S., Langheinrich, M., & Lampe, M. (2008, February 25–27). Towards guidelines for designing augmented toy environments. In Proceedings of the 7th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Cape Town, South Africa.Google Scholar
  21. Holloway, D. (in press a). Children’s digital lives: The parent factor. Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Holloway, D. (in press b). The Internet of Toys and Things (IoTTs) for children: Surveillance capitalism and children’s data. Media International Australia.Google Scholar
  23. Holloway, D., & Green, L. (2016). The internet of toys. Communication Research and Practice, 2(4), 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ihamäki, P., Pori, S., & Heljakka, K. (2018, January 10–12). Smart, skilled and connected in the 21st century: Educational promises of the Internet of Toys (IoToys). Paper presented at the Hawaii International Conference on Arts and Humanities, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  25. Kahn, P. H., Jr., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Freier, N. G., Severson, R. L., Gill, B. T., … Shen, S. (2012). “Robovie, you’ll have to go into the closet now”: Children’s social and moral relationships with a humanoid robot. Developmental Psychology, 48(2), 303–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leaver, T. (2017). Intimate surveillance: Normalizing parental monitoring and mediation of infants online. Social Media + Society, 3(2).  https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305117707192.Google Scholar
  27. Lievrouw, L. A., & Livingstone, S. (2006). Introduction to the first edition (2002): The social shaping and consequences of ICTs. In L. A. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 15–32). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  28. Livingstone, S. (2007). On the material and the symbolic: Silverstone’s double articulation of research traditions in new media studies. New Media & Society, 9(1), 16–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lyon, D. (2017). Surveillance culture: Engagement, exposure, and ethics in digital modernity. International Journal of Communication, 11, 824–842.Google Scholar
  30. Marsh, J. (2017). The internet of toys: A posthuman and multimodal analysis of connected play. Teachers College Record, 119(15). Retrieved December 20, 2017, from http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/113557/.
  31. Marsh, J., Mascheroni, G., Carrington, V., Árnadóttir, H., Brito, R., Dias, P., … Trueltzsch-Wijnen, C. (2018). The online and offline digital literacy practices of young children: A review of the literature. Sheffield: COST Action IS1410 DigiLitEY. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from http://digilitey.eu/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/WG4-LR-jan-2017.pdf.
  32. McReynolds, E., Hubbard, S., Lau, T., Saraf, A., Cakmak, M., & Roesner, F. (2017, May 6–11). Toys that listen: A study of parents, children, and internet-connected toys. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 5197–5207). Denver, Colorado. Retrieved from https://www.franziroesner.com/pdf/ToysThatListen-CHI2017.pdf.
  33. Paradeda, R., Ferreira, M. J., Martinho, C., Dias, J., & Paiva, A. (2016). A persuasive storyteller robot: Pilot study. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from https://r4l.epfl.ch/files/content/sites/r4l/files/proceedings_hri2017/R4L_HRI_2017_paper_6.pdf.
  34. Payne, M. T., & Steirer, G. (2014). Redesigning game industries studies. Creative Industries Journal, 7(1), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogoff, B. (2008). Observing sociocultural activity on three planes: Participatory appropriation, guided participation, and apprenticeship. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Solet (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 58–74). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Ruis, E. (2016). The New Ludic City: From hybrid play towards embedded play within urban spaces. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/305367984_The_New_Ludic_City_From_hybrid_play_towards_embedded_play_within_urban_spaces.
  37. Serholt, S. (2017). Child-robot interaction in education. Ph.D., University of Gothenburg, Gottenburg.Google Scholar
  38. Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Silverstone, R., Hirsch, E., & Morley, D. (1992). Information and communication technologies and the moral economy of the household. In R. Silverstone & E. Hirsch (Eds.), Consuming technologies: Media and information in domestic space (pp. 13–28). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  40. Soltano, E. (2008). How to evaluate what students have learned about cognition. AP® Psychology, 25.Google Scholar
  41. Van Dijck, J. (2014). Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance and Society, 12(2), 197–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zuboff, S. (2015). Big other: Surveillance capitalism and the prospects of an information civilization. Journal of Information Technology, 30(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationCatholic University of the Sacred HeartMilanItaly
  2. 2.School of Arts and HumanitiesEdith Cowan UniversityMt LawleyAustralia

Personalised recommendations