TNC Code of Conduct or CSR? A Regulatory Systems Perspective

  • Benedict SheehyEmail author
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


There is an increasing emphasis on codes in both international private law and specifically in efforts to encourage businesses to take on a greater share of the social costs of their activity. This chapter argues in the first instance the view that codes by themselves are inadequate to the task. While from an institutional perspective, they may be of some use driving changes to the norms of the institutional environment, from a legal point of view, they are but one piece of a regulatory system. Codes set out the norms and as such provide a foundation upon which a regulatory system stands. And, as all regulatory systems are aimed at guiding behaviour to achieve certain desired ends they are norm based. Codes that are not integrated into a coherent regulatory system suffer from their status as a stand-alone solution, are orphaned and destined for obscurity. Thus for codes to be effective, they must be embedded within a regulatory system that includes the necessary administrative and institutional infrastructure. The chapter develops a second line of argument that CSR can be best understood as form of international private business regulation. As such, CSR requires a coherent set of norms and appropriate complementary regulatory system components including some form of code. The chapter proceeds by first examining codes and taking an example of a code-only approach through an analysis of ISO 26000. It then turns to examine the design of regulatory systems and the place of codes within such systems. Next it lays out the landscape of CSR (problems of politics) and provides a well-justified definition. Finally it concludes with a summary of issues to be addressed in moving ahead with effective TNC conduct regulation.


  1. Baldwin, R., & Cave, M. (1999). Understanding regulation: Theory, strategy, and practice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balzarova, M. A., & Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social standards development: The case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 Development. Journal of Business Ethics.Google Scholar
  3. Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2007). Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework. Regulation & Governance, 1, 347–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Black, J. (2002). Critical reflections on regulation. Esrc Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation.Google Scholar
  5. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16, 294–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braithwaite, J., & Drahos, P. (2000). Global business regulation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of social corporate responsibility. Business Horizons, July-August, 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cashore, B. (2002). Legitimacy and the privatization of environmental governance. Governance, 15, 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. De Jonge, A. (2011). Transnational corporations and international law: Bringing TNCS out of the accountability vacuum. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 7, 66–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Feaver, D., & Sheehy, B. (2015). A positive theory of effective regulation. Unsw Law Journal, 35, 961–994.Google Scholar
  11. Hahn, R., & Weidtmann, C. (2016). Transnational governance, deliberative democracy, and the legitimacy of ISO 26000. Business & Society, 55, 90–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hart, H. L. (1994). The concept of law, with a postscript edited by Penelope A. Bulloch and Joseph Raz. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Haufler, V. (2009). The Kimberley process certification scheme: An innovation in global governance and conflict prevention. Journal of Business Ethics, 89, 403–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10.Google Scholar
  15. Hirschland, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility and the shaping of global public policy. New York and Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hohnen, P. (2005). The ISO and social responsibility: Breakdown or breakthrough in Bangkok. Ethical Corporation (Online). Available: Http://Www.Hohnen.Net/Articles/20050909_Ethicalcorp.Html.Google Scholar
  17. Howard-Grenville, J., Nash, J., & Coglianese, C. (2008). Constructing the license to operate: Internal factors and their influence on corporate environmental decisions. Law & Policy, 30, 73–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jenkins, R. (2001). Corporate codes of conduct: Self-regulation in a global economy. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.Google Scholar
  19. King, A. & Lennox, M. (2000). Industry self-regulation without sanctions: The chemical industry’s responsible care program. Academy Of Management Journal, 43, 698.Google Scholar
  20. Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Loconto, A., & Fouilleux, E. (2013). Politics of private regulation: Iseal and the shaping of transnational sustainability governance. Regulation & Governance, N/A–N/A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Loconto, A., Stone, J. V., & Busch, L. (2012). Tripartite standards regime. The Wiley-Blackwell encyclopedia of globalization. New York: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. Mares, R. (2010). Global corporate social responsibility, human rights and law: an interactive regulatory perspective on the voluntary-mandatory dichotomy. Transnational Legal Theory, 1(2), 221–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Implicit and explicit Csr: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. The Academy of Management Review, 33, 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Monsma, D., & Buckley, J. (2003–2004). Non-financial corporate performance: The material edges of social and environmental disclosure. University of Baltimore Journal. Environmental Law, 11.Google Scholar
  26. Moran, M. (2002). Understanding the regulatory state. British Journal of Political Science, 32, 391–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Morgan, B., & Yeung, K. (2007). An introduction to law and regulation: Text and materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Mueckenberger, U., & Jastram, S. (2010). Transnational norm-building networks and the legitimacy of corporate social responsibility standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. O’brien, C. (2011). The un special representative on business and human rights: Re-embedding or dis-embedding transnational markets. In C. Joerges & J. Falke (Eds.), Karl Polanyi, globalisation and the potential of law in transnational markets. Oxford: Hart Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
  30. Ogus, A. (1994). Regulation: Legal form and economic theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Osterhammel, J., & Petersson, N. P. (2005). Globalization: A short history. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Parker, C., & Howe, J. (2011). Ruggie’s diplomatic project and its missing regulatory infrastructure. In R. Mares (Ed.), The un guiding principles on business and human rights: Foundations and implementation. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
  33. Preuss, L. (2010). Codes of conduct in organisational context: From cascade to lattice-work of codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 471–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, B. J. (2015). Financial markets and socially responsible investing. In B. Sjåfjell & B. Richardson (Eds.), Company law and sustainability. Cambridge, Uk: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rubin, E. S. (1995). Transnational corporations and international codes of conduct: A study of the relationship between international legal cooperation and economic development. American University International Lr, 10, 1275–1289.Google Scholar
  36. Sagafi-Nejad, T., & Dunning, J. H. (2008). The Un and transnational corporations: From code of conduct to global compact. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: A trend and a movement, but of what and for what? Corporate Governance, 6, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sauvant, K. P. (2015). The negotiations of the United Nations code of conduct on transnational corporations: Experience and lessons learned. The Journal Of World Investment & Trade, 16, 11–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schmiedeknecht, M. (2008). ISO 26000—reflecting the process of a multi-stakeholder dialogue: An empirical study. Konstanz: Kiem. Working Paper Series. Konstanz: Htwg Konstanz, University of Applied Sciences, Kiem Institute for Intercultural Management, Values and Communication.Google Scholar
  40. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. New York, Uk: Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz, B., & Tilling, K. (2009). ‘Iso-Lating’ corporate social responsibility in the organizational context: A dissenting interpretation of ISO 26000. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16, 289–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Selznick, P. (1969). Law, society and industrial justice. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  43. Sheehy, B. (2004). Corporations and social costs: The Wal-Mart case study. Journal of Law & Commerce, 24, 1–55.Google Scholar
  44. Sheehy, B. (2012). Understanding Csr: An empirical study of private self-regulation. Monash University Law Review, 38, 103–127.Google Scholar
  45. Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sheehy, B. (2017a). Conceptual and institutional interfaces between CSR, corporate law and the problem of social costs. Virginia Law & Business Journal, 12, 93.Google Scholar
  47. Sheehy, B. (2017b). Private and public corporate regulatory systems: Does Csr provide a systemic alternative to public law? Uc Davis Business Law Journal, 17, 1–55.Google Scholar
  48. Sheehy, B., & Feaver, D. (2015). A normative theory of effective regulation. Unsw Law Journal, 35, 392–425.Google Scholar
  49. Slob, B., & Oonk, G. (2007). The ISO working group on social responsibility: Developing the future Iso Sr 26000 standard. Amsterdam: Somo Centre for Research on Multinational Corporations.Google Scholar
  50. Soule, S. (2009). Contention and corporate social responsibility. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sparrow, M. K. (2000). The regulatory craft: Controlling risks, solving problems and managing compliance. Washington: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stiglitz, J. E. (2002). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  53. Tamm Hallstrom, K. (2008). ISO expands its business into social responsibility. In M. Bostrom & C. Garsten (Eds.), Tamm Hallstrom, Kristina. “ISO expands its business into social responsibility.” In organizing transnational accountability, edited By Magnus Bostrom and Christina Garsten (46–60). Cheltenham, UK, Northampton, USA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  54. Vogt, C. (2001). On not letting the wolves watch out for the deer. It World (Online). Available: Http://Www.Itworld.Com/Article/2797623/Data-Center/On-Not-Letting-The-Wolves-Watch-Out-For-The-Deer.Html. Accessed 13/02/2017.Google Scholar
  55. Ward, H. (2011). The ISO 26000 International guidance standard on social responsibility: Implications for public policy and transnational democracy. Theoretical Inquire is Into Law, 12, 664.Google Scholar
  56. Webb, K. (2005). The ISO 26000 social responsibility guidance standard—Progress so far. Les Cahiers De La Chaire—Collection Recherche. Montreal: Uqam.Google Scholar
  57. Webb, K. (2015). Iso 26000 social responsibility standard as ‘Proto Law’ and a new form of global custom: Positioning ISO 26000 in the emerging transnational regulatory governance rule instrument architecture. Transnational Legal Theory, 6, 466–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. White, B. J., & Montgomery, B. R. (1980). Corporate codes of conduct. California Management Review, 23, 80–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zerk, J. (2006). Multinationals and corporate responsibility: Limitations and opportunities in international law. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Law and JusticeUniversity of CanberraBruceAustralia

Personalised recommendations