Advertisement

Legal Status and Autonomy of International Sporting Governing Bodies and Rules Governing Sporting Nationality

  • Jan ExnerEmail author
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Law book series (BRIEFSLAW)

Abstract

Regarding the notion of sporting nationality, international sporting governing bodies play a vital role since they set up and enforce rules governing athletes’ eligibility for national teams.

References

Legal Documents

  1. Council of Europe Convention on the Manipulation of Sports Competitions (2014)Google Scholar
  2. European Convention on NationalityGoogle Scholar
  3. European Sports Charter (1992, revised 2001)Google Scholar
  4. FIFA Statutes (2018)Google Scholar
  5. ISU Constitution (2016)Google Scholar
  6. ISU Special Regulations & Technical Rules, Single and Pair Skating & Ice Dance (2018)Google Scholar
  7. Olympic Charter (2017)Google Scholar
  8. Statutes of the Czech Olympic Committee (2018)Google Scholar

Cases

  1. BGH, 7. 6. 2016 - KZR 6/15, Pechstein v. International Skating Union [2016]Google Scholar
  2. CAS 92/80, B. v. International Basketball Federation (FIBA), [1993]Google Scholar
  3. CAS 98/215, International Baseball Association (IBA), Advisory Opinion, [1999]Google Scholar
  4. Case C-519/04 P, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. Commission, [2006] EU:C:2006:492Google Scholar
  5. Case T-313/02, Meca-Medina and Majcen v. Commission, [2004] EU:T:2004:282Google Scholar
  6. CAS 98/2009, Spanish Basketball Federation (FEB) / International Basketball Federation (FIBA), [1999]Google Scholar
  7. Mutu and Pechstein v. Switzerland, no. 40575/10 and 67474/10, 2 October 2018, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1002JUD004057510Google Scholar
  8. Nottebohm (Liechtenstein v. Guatemala), ICJ Reports 1955Google Scholar

Bibliography

  1. Calmat A (1992) Sport et nationalisme. Pouvoirs no 61 - Le sportGoogle Scholar
  2. de Groot GR (2006) Sporting nationality: remarks on the relationship between the general legal nationality of a person and his “Sporting Nationality”. Int Sports Law J 1–2Google Scholar
  3. Dubey J-P (2004) Nationalité sportive: une notion autonome”. In: Oswald D (ed) La nationalité dans le sport: enjeux et problèmes: actes du Congrès des 10 et 11 novembre 2005‬, Editions CIES, pp 31–45‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬‬Google Scholar
  4. Duval A (2015) The court of arbitration for sport and EU law. Chronicle of an EncounterGoogle Scholar
  5. Ettinger DJ (1992) The legal status of the international olympic committee. Pace Int Law Rev 4(1):97–121Google Scholar
  6. Exner J (2018) European union law and sporting nationality: promising alliance or dangerous liaison? Lexis Middle East LawGoogle Scholar
  7. Exner J (2013) Sportovní národnost ve světle práva Evropské unie. Právník, Year 152(10):1029–1044Google Scholar
  8. Finn T (2016) Qatar’s recruited athletes stir debate on citizenship. Reuters, 25 August 2016, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  9. Hafner Y (2012) Athletes’ eligibility in national teams and EU law: what can we learn from two doped swimmers?. In: Rigozzi A, Sprumont D, Hafner Y (eds) Citius, Altius, Fortius - Mélanges en l’honneur de Denis Oswald. Helbing & Lichtenhahn (Bâle), pp 215–238Google Scholar
  10. Hafner Y (2008) Change in sporting nationality: the “next Bosman”? Olympic Capital Q 3(4):1–3Google Scholar
  11. Hafner Y (2009) Sporting nationality in the ancient and modern olympic games. In: Proceedings of the 17th international seminar on olympic studies for postgraduate students, International Olympic Academy, Ancient OlympiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Hervé A (2009) Les problèmes éthiques de la nationalité dans le sport (2009) Colloque international Ethique et sport en Europe. Université Rennes II, Rennes, France, pp 1–10Google Scholar
  13. Humphreys J (2015) George, Kevin-Prince and Jérôme Boateng: football’s intriguing brothers. Guardian, 22 April 2015, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  14. Iorwerth H, Hardman A, Jones CR (2014) Nation, state and identity in international sport. Natl Identities 16:4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kelner M (2014) Belgium 1-0 Tunisia: Adnan Januzaj wins his first cap in hailstorm delayed victory… but Romelu Lukaku limps off with injury. Mail Online, 7 June 2014, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  16. Kostakopoulou D, Schrauwen A (2014) Olympic citizenship and the (un)specialness of the national vest: rethinking the link between sport and citizenship law. Int J Law Context 10:143–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lajous M (2012) Jeux et enjeux autours des questions de nationalité sportive. In: Attali M, Bazoge N (eds) Diriger le sport. Perspectives sur la gouvernance du sport du xxe siècle à nos jours, CNRS EditionsGoogle Scholar
  18. Lawton M, Fagge N (2013) Inside Adnan Januzaj’s world: owned by united, chased by England… the wonder boy whose parents escaped the Kosovo war to move to Belgium. Read his amazing story. Mail Online, 16 October 2013, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  19. MacLaren R (2010) Twenty-five years of the court of arbitration for sport: a look in the rear-view mirror. Marquette Sports Law Rev 305–333Google Scholar
  20. McArdle D (2011) Longitudinal profiling, sports arbitration and the woman who had nothing to lose: some thoughts on Pechstein v. International Skating Union. In: McNamee M, Møller V (eds) Doping and anti-doping policy in sport: ethical, legal and social perspectives. Ethics and Sport, Abingdon, Oxon, Taylor & Francis, Routledge, pp 50–65Google Scholar
  21. McCutcheon JP (2001) National eligibility rules after Bosman. In: Caiger A (ed) Professional sport in the EU: regulation and re-regulation. T.M.C. Asser PressGoogle Scholar
  22. Mestre AM (2009) The law of the olympic games. T.M.C. Asser PressGoogle Scholar
  23. Nafziger JAR (2004) International sports law, 2nd ed. Martinus NijhoffGoogle Scholar
  24. Oswald D (2009) Nationalité dans le sport. In: Cholley P (ed) Treizième [XIIIe] Congrès olympique, Copenhague 2009: contributions. Comité International OlympiqueGoogle Scholar
  25. Pautot M (2014) Sport et nationalité. Quelle place pour les joueurs étrangers? L’HarmattanGoogle Scholar
  26. Reeb M (ed) (1998) Recueil des sentences du TAS Digest of CAS Awards 1986–1998. Staempfli Editions, Number 15Google Scholar
  27. Reeb M (ed) (2002) Recueil des sentences du TAS Digest of CAS Awards II 1998–2000. Kluwer Law International, Number 9Google Scholar
  28. Shachar A (2011) Picking Winners: Olympic Citizenship and the Global Race for Talent. 120 Yale L. J. 2088Google Scholar
  29. Shachar A, Hirschl R (2013) Recruiting “Super Talent”: the new world of selective migration regimes. Indiana J Glob Leg Stud 20(1)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Siekmann R (2011) Sport and Nationality: Accelerated naturalisation for national representative purposes and discrimination issues in individual team competitions under EU law. Int Sports Law J 85(3–4):241–268Google Scholar
  31. Wollmann AS, Vonk O, de Groot GR (2015) Towards a sporting nationality? Maastricht J Eur Comp Law 22(2):305–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Anastasiya Kuzmina Profile, International Biathlon Union, archived from the original on 9 June 2017, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  33. Anton Shipulin Profile, International Biathlon Union, archived from the original on 9 June 2017, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  34. Danijel Šarić Profile, European Handball Federation, archived from the original on 10 June 2017, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  35. Falsche Fans simulieren Stimmung. Frankfurter Allgemeine. 20 January 2015 retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  36. Jakov Fak Profile, International Biathlon Union, archived from the original on 9 June 2017, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  37. Palestine Football: Escape to Victory?. Bruisedearth, 27 October 2008, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar
  38. Qatar’s foreign legion primed for handball date with Germany. DW, 27 January 2015, retrieved 31 October 2018Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of LawCharles UniversityPragueCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations