Advertisement

Preventive Maintenance Models for Technical Systems

  • Sylwia Werbińska-WojciechowskaEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Springer Series in Reliability Engineering book series (RELIABILITY)

Abstract

There are analysed and summarized the results of preventive maintenance, one of the most commonly used maintenance strategy. The reviewed literature is classified into two main groups of models for one-unit and multi-unit systems. For single-unit systems the author investigates age-replacement policies, block-replacement policies, sequential preventive maintenance policies, failure limit policies and repair limit policies. The optimum policies are discussed, and their several modified and extended models are presented. The main extensions include imperfect maintenance implementation, shock modelling, or finite/infinite time horizon modelling cases. The classification also includes optimality criterion and used modelling method. For multi-component systems maintenance case there are analysed the main replacement policies for systems with and without components dependence. First, the simplest models are analysed, i.e. age-replacement and block-replacement policies. Later, the maintenance policies for systems with components dependence are introduced. The author summarizes the latest developments for group maintenance, opportunistic maintenance, and cannibalization maintenance models. The discussion of models bases on criteria, among others, planning horizon, modelling method, and optimization criterion. The main development directions in preventive maintenance modelling are presented in a graphical form. The brief summary of the conducted literature review is provided with indicating the main research gaps in this modelling area.

References

  1. 1.
    Abdel-Hameed M (1995) Inspection, maintenance and replacement models. Comput Oper Res 22(4):435–441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(94)00051-9CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Abdel-Hameed M (1986) Optimum replacement of a system subject to shocks. J Appl Probab 23:107–114MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aboulfath F (1995) Optimal maintenance schedules for a fleet of vehicles under the constraint of the single repair facility. M.Sc. thesis. University of Toronto, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aghezzaf EH, Jamali MA, Ait-Kadi D (2007) An integrated production and preventive maintenance planning model. Eur J Oper Res 181:679–685.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2006.06.032CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ahmad R, Kamaruddin S (2012) An overview of time-based and condition-based maintenance in industrial application. Comput Ind Eng 63:135–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2012.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Albright TL, Geber CA, Juras P (2014) How naval aviation uses the balanced scorecard. Strateg FinanceGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andrzejczak K (2015) Stochastic modelling of the repairable system. J KONBiN 3(35):5–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anisimov VV (2005) Asymptotic analysis of stochastic block replacement policies for multi-component systems in a Markov environment. Oper Res Lett 33:26–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2004.03.009MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Armstrong MJ (2002) Age repair policies for the machine repair problem. Eur J Oper Res 138:127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00135-7MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Assid M, Gharbi A, Hajji A (2015) Production planning and opportunistic preventive maintenance for unreliable one-machine two-products manufacturing systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine 48–3:478–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Aven T, Dekker R (1997) A useful framework for optimal replacement models. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 58(1):61–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(97)00055-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bai DS, Yun WY (1986) An age replacement policy with minimal repair cost limit. IEEE Trans Reliab 35(4):452–454zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bai J, Pham H (2005) Repair-limit risk-free warranty policies with imperfect repair. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 35(6):765–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bai Y, Jia X, Cheng Z (2011) Group optimization models for multi-component system compound maintenance tasks. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc—Maint Reliab 1:42–47Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Barlow RE, Proschan F (1964) Comparison of replacement policies, and renewal theory implications. Ann Math Stat 35(2):577–589.  https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177703557MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartholomew-Biggs M, Christianson B, Zuo M (2006) Optimizing preventive maintenance models. Comput Optim Appl 35:261–279.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-006-6449-xMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baxter LA (1988) On the theory of cannibalization. J Math Anal Appl 136:290–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-247X(88)90131-XMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bedford T, Alkabi BM (2009) Modelling competing risks and opportunistic maintenance with expert judgement. In: Martorell S, Guedes Soares C, Barnett J (eds) Safety, reliability and risk analysis: theory, methods and applications—proceedings of European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2008, Valencia, Spain, 22–25 Sept 2008. Taylor and Francis, Leiden, pp 515–521Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bedford T, Dewan I, Meilijson I, Zitrou A (2011) The signal model: a model for competing risks of opportunistic maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 214:665–673.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.05.016MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Beichelt F (1992) A general maintenance model and its application to repair limit replacement policies. Microelectron Reliab 32(8):1185–1196.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0026-2714(92)90036-KCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Beichelt F (1999) A general approach to total repair cost limit replacement policies. ORiON 15(1/2):67–75Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bergman B (1978) Optimal replacement under a general failure model. Adv Appl Probab 10:431–451MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Berthaut F, Gharbi A, Dhouib K (2011) Joint modified block replacement and production/inventory control policy for a failure-prone manufacturing cell. Omega 39:642–654.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Block HW, Langberg NA, Savits TH (1993) Repair replacement policies. J Appl Probab 30:194–206.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3214632MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Block HW, Langberg NA, Savits TH (1990) Maintenance comparisons: block policies. J Appl Probab 27:649–657.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3214548MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Block HW, Langberg NA, Savits TH (1990) Comparisons for maintenance policies involving complete and minimal repair. Lecture notes-monograph series, vol 16: Topics in statistical dependence, pp 57–68Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bobrowski D (1977) On mathematical models of renewable technical objects (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 43–64Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Borgonovo E, Marseguerra M, Zio E (2000) A Monte Carlo methodological approach to plant availability modelling with maintenance, aging and obsolescence. Reliab Eng System Safety 67:61–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(99)00046-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Brown M, Proschan F (1982) Imperfect maintenance. Lecture notes—monograph series, vol 2: Survival Analysis, pp 179–188Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Budai G, Dekker R, Nicolai RP (2006) A review of planning models for maintenance and production. Econometric Institute, Erasmus School of Economics, Erasmus UniversityGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bukowski L (1980) Optimization of technical systems maintenance policy (case study of metallurgical production line) (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Centre for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 47–62Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Butani NL (1991) Replacement policies based on minimal repair and cost limit criterion. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 32:349–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(91)90008-UCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Byrkett DL (1985) Units of equipment available using cannibalization for repair-part support. IEEE Trans Reliab R-34(1):25–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Caldeira DJ, Taborda CJ, Trigo TP (2012) An optimal preventive maintenance policy of parallel-series systems. J Polish Safety Reliab Assoc Summer Safety Reliab Semin 3(1):29–34Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Canfield RV (1986) Cost optimization of periodic preventive maintenance. IEEE Trans Reliab R-35(1):78–81.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.1986.4335355zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cavalcante CAV, Lopes RS (2015) Multi-criteria model to support the definition of opportunistic maintenance policy: a study in a cogeneration system. Energy 80:32–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Cha JH, Kim JJ (2002) On the existence of the steady state availability of imperfect repair model. Sankhya: Indian J Stat 64, series B(Pt. 1):76–81Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Chan J-K, Shaw L (1993) Modeling repairable systems with failure rates that depend on age and maintenance. IEEE Trans Reliab 42(4):566–571.  https://doi.org/10.1109/24.273583CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chang Ch-Ch (2014) Optimum preventive maintenance policies for systems subject to random working times, replacement, and minimal repair. Comput Ind Eng 67:185–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2013.11.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chang Ch-Ch, Sheu S-H, Chen Y-L (2013) Optimal replacement model with age-dependent failure type based on a cumulative repair-cost limit policy. Appl Math Model 37:308–317.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.031MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chang Ch-Ch, Sheu S-H, Chen Y-L (2013) Optimal number of minimal repairs before replacement based on a cumulative repair-cost limit policy. Comput Ind Eng 59:603–610.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chelbi A, Ait-Kadi D, Aloui H (2007) Availability optimization for multi-component systems subjected to periodic replacement. In: Aven T, Vinnem JM (eds) Risk, reliability and societal safety—proceedings of European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2007, Stavanger, Norway, 25–27 June 2007. Taylor and Francis, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cheng Y-H, Tsao H-L (2010) Rolling stock maintenance strategy selection, spares parts’ estimation, and replacements’ interval calculation. Int J Prod Econ 128:404–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cheng Z, Yang Z, Guo B (2013) Optimal opportunistic maintenance model of multi-unit systems. J Syst Eng Electron 24(5):811–817.  https://doi.org/10.1109/jsee.2013.00094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cheng Z, Yang Z, Tan L, Guo B (2011) Optimal inspection and maintenance policy for the multi-unit series system. In: Proceedings of 9th international conference on reliability, maintainability and safety (ICRMS) 2011, 12–15 June 2011, Guiyang, pp 811–814Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Chien Y-H (2008) A general age-replacement model with minimal repair under renewing free-replacement warranty. Eur J Oper Res 186:1046–1058.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.02.030MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Chien Y-H, Sheu S-H (2006) Extended optimal age-replacement policy with minimal repair of a system subject to shocks. Eur J Oper Res 174:169–181.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.032CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Cho ID, Parlar M (1991) A survey of maintenance models for multi-unit systems. Eur J Oper Res 51(1):1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Chowdhury Ch (1988) A systematic survey of the maintenance models. Periodica Polytechnica. Mech Eng 32(3–4):253–274Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Christer AH (1986) Comments on finite-period applications of age-based replacement models. IMA J Math Manag 1:111–124MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Christer AH, Keddie E (1985) Experience with a stochastic replacement model. J Oper Res Soc 36(1):25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Colosimo EA, Santos WB, Gilardoni GL, Motta SB (2006) Optimal maintenance time for repairable systems under two types of failures. In: Soares CG, Zio E (eds) Safety and reliability for managing risk—proceedings of European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2006, Estoril, Portugal, 18–22 Sept 2006. Taylor and Francis, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Coolen-Schrijner P, Coolen FPA, Shaw SC (2014) Nonparametric adaptive opportunity-based age replacement strategies. J Oper Res Soc 57(1):63–81.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601954CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Crookes PCI (1963) Replacement strategies. OR 14(2):167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Crowell JI, Sen PK (1989) Estimation of optimal block replacement policies. Mimeo series/the Institute of Statistics, the Consolidated University of North Carolina, Department of Statistics. Available at: stat.ncsu.eduGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Cui L, Li H (2006) Opportunistic maintenance for multi-component shock models. Math Methods Oper Res 63(3):493–511.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-005-0058-9MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Curtin NP (2001) Military aircraft: Cannibalizations adversely affect personnel and maintenance. US General Accounting Office, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dagpunar JS (1994) Some necessary and sufficient conditions for age replacement with non-zero downtimes. J Oper Res Soc 45(2):225–229zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Dao CD, Zuo MJ (2017) Selective maintenance of multi-state systems with structural dependence. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 159:184–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Dao CD, Zuo MJ (2017) Optimal selective maintenance of multi-state systems in variable loading conditions. Reliab Eng Sys Safety 166:171–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Das AN, Sarmah SP (2010) Preventive replacement models: an overview and their application in process industries. Eur J Ind Eng 4(3):280–307.  https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIE.2010.033332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    De Jonge B, Teunter R, Tinga T (2017) The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 158:21–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Dekker R (1996) Applications of maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 51(3):229–240.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0951-8320(95)00076-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Dekker R, Dijkstra MC (1992) Opportunity-based age replacement: exponentially distributed times between opportunities. Naval Res Logist 39:175–190zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Dekker R, Roelvink IFK (1995) Marginal cost criteria for preventive replacement of a group of components. Eur J Oper Res 84:467–480zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Dekker R, Wildeman RE, Van Der Duyn Schouten FA (1997) A review of multi-component maintenance models with economic dependence. Math Methods Oper Res 45:411–435MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Derigent W, Thomas E, Levrat E, Iung B (2009) Opportunistic maintenance based on fuzzy modelling of component proximity. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 58:29–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Dimitrov B, Chukova S, Khalil Z (2004) Warranty costs: an age-dependent failure/repair model. Naval Res Logist 51(7):959–976.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.20037MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ding S-H, Kamaruddin S (2012) Selection of optimal maintenance policy by using fuzzy multi criteria decision making method. In: Proceedings of the 2012 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Istanbul, Turkey, 3–6 July 2012, pp 435–443Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Do P, Vu HC, Barros A, Berrenguer Ch (2015) Maintenance grouping for multi-component systems with availability constraints and limited maintenance teams. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 142:56–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.04.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Van Do P, Barros A, Berenguer Ch, Bouvard K (2013) Dynamic grouping maintenance with time limited opportunities. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 120:51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2013.03.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Dohi T, Ashioka A, Kaio N, Osaki S (2006) Statistical estimation algorithms for repairs-time limit replacement scheduling under earning rate criteria. Comput Math Appl 51:345–356.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2005.11.004MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Dohi T, Ashioka A, Kaio N, Osaki S (2003) The optimal repair-time limit replacement policy with imperfect repair: Lorenz transform approach. Math Comput Model 38:1169–1176.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90117-8MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Dohi T, Kaio N, Osaki S (2003) Preventive maintenance models: replacement, repair, ordering, and inspection. In: Pham H (ed) Handbook of reliability engineering. Springer, London, pp 349–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Dohi T, Kaio N, Osaki S (2000) A graphical method to repair-cost limit replacement policies with imperfect repair. Math Comput Model 31:99–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(00)00076-5MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Dohi T, Kaio N, Osaki S (2003) A new graphical method to estimate the optimal repair-time limit with incomplete repair and discounting. Comput Math Appl 46:999–1007.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)90114-3MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Dohi T, Matsushima N, Kaio N, Osaki S (1996) Nonparametric repair-limit replacement policies with imperfect repair. Eur J Oper Res 96:260–273zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Dohi T, Takeita K, Osaki S (2000) Graphical method for determining/estimating optimal repair-limit replacement policies. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 7(01):43–60zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Do Rego JR, De Mesquita MA (2011) Spare parts inventory control: a literature review. Producao 21(4):656–666Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Drobiszewski J, Smalko Z (2006) The equable maintenance strategy. J KONBiN 2:375–383Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Duarte AC, Craveiro Taborda JC, Craveiro A, Trigo TP (2005) Optimization of the preventive maintenance plan of a series components system. In: Kołowrocki K (ed) Advances in safety and reliability—proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2005), Gdynia-Sopot-Gdańsk, Poland, 27–30 June 2005. A.A. Balkema, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Epstain S, Wilamowsky Y (1985) Opportunistic replacement in a deterministic environment. Comput Oper Res 12(3):311–322zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Fard N, Zheng X (1991) An approximate method for non-repairable systems based on opportunistic replacement policy. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 33:277–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Firkowicz S, Karpiński J (1977) Optimization methods of preventive maintenance actions (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 125–144Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Fisher WW (1990) Markov process modelling of a maintenance system with spares, repair, cannibalization and manpower constraints. Math Comput Model 13(7):119–125MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Frees EW (1986) Optimizing costs on ager replacement policies. Stochastic Process Their Appl 21:195–212MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Fritzsche R, Gupta JND, Lasch R (2014) Optimal prognostic distance to minimize total maintenance cost: the case of the airline industry. Int J Prod Econ 151:76–88.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Frostig E (2003) Comparison of maintenance policies with monotone failure rate distributions. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 19:51–65.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.485MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Garg J (2013) Maintenance: spare parts optimization. M2 Research Intern Theses, Ecole Centrale de ParisGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Gaver DP, Isaacson KE, Abell JB (1993) Estimating aircraft recoverable spares requirements with cannibalization of designated items. RAND, R-4213-AFGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Geurts JHJ (1983) Optimal age replacement versus condition based replacement: some theoretical and practical considerations. J Qual Technol 15(4):171–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Glasser GJ (1967) The age replacement problem. Technometrics 9(1):83–91MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Grigoriev A, Van De Klundert J, Spieksma FCR (2006) Modeling and solving the periodic maintenance problem. Eur J Oper Res 172:783–797.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.11.013MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gunn EA, Diallo C (2015) Optimal opportunistic indirect grouping of preventive replacements in multicomponent systems. Comput Ind Eng 90:281–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.09.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Gurler U, Kaya A (2002) A maintenance policy for a system with multi-state components: an approximate solution. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 76:117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00125-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gustavsson E, Patriksson M, Stromberg A-B, Wojciechowski A, Onnheim M (2014) Preventive maintenance scheduling of multi-component systems with interval costs. Comput Ind Eng 76:390–400.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.02.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Haurie A, L’ecuyer PL (1982) A stochastic control approach to group preventive replacement in a multicomponent system. IEEE Trans Autom Control AC-27(2):387–393zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Haque SA, Zohrul Kabir ABM, Sarker RA (2003) Optimization model for opportunistic replacement policy using genetic algorithm with fuzzy logic controller. In: Proceedings of the Congress on evolutionary computation 4:2837–2843Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Hoover J, Jondrow JM, Trost RS, Ye M (2002) A model to study: cannibalization, FMC, and customer waiting time. CNA, AlexandriaGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Hopp WJ, Kuo Y-L (1998) Heuristics for multicomponent joint replacement: applications to aircraft engine maintenance. Naval Res Logist 45:435–458zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Hou W, Jiang Z (2013) An opportunistic maintenance policy of multi-unit series production system with consideration of imperfect maintenance. Appl Math Inf Sci 7(1L):283–290MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Hu J, Zhang L (2014) Risk based opportunistic maintenance model for complex mechanical systems. Expert Syst Appl 41(6):3105–3115.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.10.041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hu J, Zhang L, Liang W (2012) Opportunistic predictive maintenance for complex multi-component systems based on DBN-HAZOP model. Process Saf Environ Prot 90:376–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Huynh TK, Barros A, Berenguer Ch (2013) A reliability-based opportunistic predictive maintenance model for k-out-of-n deteriorating systems. Chem Eng Trans 33:493–498Google Scholar
  105. 105.
    Hsu JIS (1990) Equipment replacement policy: a survey. Hosp Mater Manag Q 2(1):69–75Google Scholar
  106. 106.
    Iskandar BP, Sandoh H (2000) An extended opportunity-based age replacement policy. RAIRO Oper Res 34:145–154MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Ito K, Nakagawa T (2011) Comparison of three cumulative damage models. Qual Technol Quant Manag 8(1):57–66.  https://doi.org/10.1080/16843703.2011.11673246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Iung B, Levrat E, Thomas E (2007) Odds algorithm’-based opportunistic maintenance task execution for preserving product conditions. Ann CIRP 56(1):13–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Janisz K, Krupa M (2007) Model of operating condition influence on element reliability of rail vehicles using fuzzy sets (in Polish). Maint Probl 2:19–26Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Jayabalan V, Chaudhuri D (1992) Cost optimization of maintenance scheduling for a system with assured reliability. IEEE Trans Reliab 41(1):21–25.  https://doi.org/10.1109/24.126665CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Jędrzejowicz P (1977) Optimization models for renewal processes (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 181–198Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Jhang JP, Sheu SH (1999) Opportunity-based age replacement policy with minimal repair. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 64:339–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Jiang R, Ji P (2002) Age replacement policy: a multi-attribute value model. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 76:311–318.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00021-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Jiang X, Cheng K, Makis V (1998) On the optimality of repair-cost-limit policies. J Appl Probab 35:936–949MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Jodejko A (2008) Maintenance problems of technical systems composed of heterogeneous elements. In: Proceedings of summer safety and reliability seminars, 22–28 June 2008, Gdańsk-Sopot, Poland, 187–194Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Jodejko A, Werbińska S (2008) Block inspection maintenance policy of multi-component systems with economic dependency. J KONBiN 3(6):265–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Jodejko-Pietruczuk A, Plewa M (2012) The model of reverse logistics, based on reliability theory with elements’ rejuvenation. Logist Transp 2(15):27–35Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Kabir ABMZ, Farrash SHA (1996) Simulation of an integrated age replacement and spare provisioning policy using SLAM. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 52:129–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    Kapur PK, Garg RB (1989) Optimal number of minimal repairs before replacement with repair cost limit. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 26:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Karpiński J (1988) Chosen problems of technical objects’ preventive maintenance strategy (In Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 151–164Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Kayid M, Izadkhah S, Alshami S (2016) Laplace transform ordering of time to failure in age replacement models. J Korean Stat Soc 45(1):101–113MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Ke H, Yao K (2016) Block replacement policy with uncertain lifetimes. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 148:119–124.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.12.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Kececioglu D, Sun F-B (1995) A general discrete-time dynamic programming model for the opportunistic replacement policy and its application to ball-bearing systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 47:175–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Keomany B, Samuel A, Christophe B, Vincent C (2008) Maintenance cost study for deteriorating systems: age-replacement policy vs. condition-based maintenance policy. In: Proceedings of summer safety and reliability seminars, June 2008, Gdansk-Sopot, Poland, pp 85–92Google Scholar
  125. 125.
    Khalifa D, Hottenstein M, Aggarwal S (1977) Technical note—cannibalization policies for multistate systems. Oper Res 25(6):1032–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Kim HG, Yun WY (2010) A repair-time limit replacement policy with estimation error. Commun Stat Theory Methods 39:2365–2378.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610920903402597MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Kim HS, Sub Kwon Y, Park DH (2006) Bayesian method on sequential preventive maintenance problem. Korean Commun Stat 13(1):191–204Google Scholar
  128. 128.
    Kim J, Ahn Y, Yeo H (2016) A comparative study of time-based maintenance and condition-based maintenance for optimal choice of maintenance policy. Struct Infrastruct Eng 12(12):1525–1536.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2016.1149871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Kołowrocki K, Soszyńska-Budny J (2010) Optimization of exploitation processes of complex technical systems (in Polish). Maint Probl 1:31–40zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Koshimae H, Dohi T, Kaio N, Osaki S (1996) Graphical/statistical approach to repair limit replacement policies. J Oper Res 39(2):230–246MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    Kumar D, Westberg U (1997) Maintenance scheduling under age replacement policy using proportional hazards model and TTT-ploting. Eur J Oper Res 99:507–515zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    Kustroń K, Cieślak Ł (2012) The optimization of replacement time for non-repairable aircraft component. J KONBiN 2(22):45–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Laggoune R, Chateauneuf A, Aissani D (2010) Impact of few failure data on the opportunistic replacement policy for multi-component systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 95:108–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.08.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Laggoune R, Chateauneuf A, Aissani D (2009) Opportunistic policy for optimal preventive maintenance of a multi-component system in continuous operating units. Comput Chem Eng 33:1499–1510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Lai M-T (2014) Optimal replacement period with repair cost limit and cumulative damage model. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc—Maint Reliab 16(2):246–252Google Scholar
  136. 136.
    Lai M-T, Chen Y-CH (2006) Optimal periodic replacement policy for a two-unit system with failure rate interaction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 29:367–371MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Lai M-T, Leu B-Y (1996) An economic discrete replacement policy for a shock damage model with minimal repairs. Microecon Reliab 36(10):1347–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Lai M-T, Yuan J (1993) Cost-optimal periodical replacement policy for a system subjected to shock damage. Microelectron Reliab 33(8):1159–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Lai M-T, Yuan J (1991) Periodic replacement model for a parallel system subject to independent and common cause shock failures. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 31(3):355–367zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Lam CT, Yeh RH (1994) Optimal replacement policies for multi-state deteriorating systems. Naval Res Logist 41(3):303–315zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Lamberts SWJ, Nicolai RP (2008) Maintenance models for systems subject to measurable deterioration. Rozenberg Publishers, Rotterdam, University DissertationGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Langberg NA (1988) Comparisons of replacement policies. J Appl Probab 25:780–788MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  143. 143.
    Legat V, Zaludowa AH, Cervenka V, Jurca V (1996) Contribution to optimization of preventive replacement. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 51:259–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Leung FKN, Zhang YL, Lai KK (2011) Analysis for a two-dissimilar-component cold standby repairable system with repair priority. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 96:1542–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2011.06.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Lie CH, Chun YH (1986) An algorithm for preventive maintenance policy. IEEE Trans Reliab R-35(1):71–75zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  146. 146.
    Lim JH, Qu J, Zuo MJ (2016) Age replacement policy based on imperfect repair with random probability. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 149:24–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Liu Y, Li Y, Huang H-Z, Kuang Y (2011) An optimal sequential preventive maintenance policy -under stochastic maintenance quality. Struct Infrastruct Engineering: Maint Manag Life-Cycle Des Perf 7(4):315–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Lv X-Z, Fan B-X, Gu Y, Zhao X-H (2013) Selective maintenance model considering cannibalization and its solving algorithm. In: Proceedings of 2013 international conference on quality, reliability, risk, maintenance, and safety engineering (WR2MSE). IEEE, pp 717–723Google Scholar
  149. 149.
    Mahdavi M, Mahdavi M (2009) Optimization of age replacement policy using reliability based heuristic model. J Sci Ind Res 68:668–673Google Scholar
  150. 150.
    Maillart LM, Fang X (2006) Optimal maintenance policies for serial, multi-machine systems with non-instantaneous repairs. Naval Res Logis 53(8):804–813MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Martorell S, Sanchez A, Serradell V (1999) Age-dependent reliability model considering effects of maintenance and working conditions. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 64:19–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Mazzuchi TA, Soyer R (1996) A Bayesian perspective on some replacement strategies. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 51:295–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Mazzuchi TA, Van Noortwijk JM, Kallen MJ (2007) Maintenance optimization. Technical Report, TR-2007–9Google Scholar
  154. 154.
    Mccall JJ (1965) Maintenance policies for stochastically failing equipment: a survey. Manage Sci 11(5):493–524MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Meenu G (2011) Identification of factors affecting product cannibalization in Indian automobile sector. IJCEM Int J Comput Eng Manag 12:2230–7893Google Scholar
  156. 156.
    Mercier S, Labeau P-E (2004) Optimal replacement policy for a series system with obsolescence. Appl Stoch Models Bus Ind 20:73–91.  https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.516MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Murthy DNP, Nguyen DG (1988) An optimal repair cost limit policy for servicing warranty. Math Comput Model 11:595–599MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Nakagawa T (2014) Random maintenance policies. Springer, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Nakagawa T (2005) Maintenance theory of reliability. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Nakagawa T (2003) Maintenance and optimum policy. In: Pham H (ed) Handbook of reliability engineering. Springer, London, pp 397–414Google Scholar
  161. 161.
    Nakagawa T (1986) Periodic and sequential preventive maintenance policies. J Appl Probab 23:536–542MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Nakagawa T (1984) A summary of discrete replacement policies. Eur J Oper Res 17(3):382–392MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  163. 163.
    Nakagawa T (1979) Optimum replacement policies for a used unit. J Oper Res Soc Jpn 22(4):338–346zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  164. 164.
    Nakagawa T, Kowada M (1983) Analysis of a system with minimal repair and its application to replacement policy. Eur J Oper Res 12(2):176–182zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  165. 165.
    Nakagawa T, Mizutani S (2009) A summary of maintenance policies for a finite interval. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94:89–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  166. 166.
    Nakagawa T, Mizutani S (2008) Periodic and sequential imperfect preventive maintenance policies for cumulative damage models. In: Pham H (ed) Recent advances in reliability and quality in design. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  167. 167.
    Nakagawa T, Osaki S (1974) The optimum repair limit replacement policies. Oper Res Q 25(2):311–317MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  168. 168.
    Nakagawa T, Zhao X (2015) Maintenance overtime policies in reliability theory. Models with random working cycles. Springer International Publishing, SwitzerlandCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  169. 169.
    Nakagawa T, Zhao X, Yun WY (2011) Optimal age replacement and inspection policies with random failure and replacement times. Int J Reliab Qual Saf Eng 18(5):405–416.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218539311004159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  170. 170.
    Nguyen K-A, Do P, Grall A (2015) Multi-level predictive maintenance for multi-component systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 144:83–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  171. 171.
    Nicolai RP Dekker R (2007) A review of multi-component maintenance models. In: Aven T, Vinnem JM (eds) Risk, reliability and societal safety—proceedings of European safety and reliability conference ESREL 2007, Stavanger, Norway, 25–27 June 2007. Taylor and Francis, Leiden, pp 289–296Google Scholar
  172. 172.
    Nicolai RP, Dekker R (2006) Optimal maintenance of multicomponent systems: a review. Economic Institute ReportGoogle Scholar
  173. 173.
    Nowakowski T, Plewa M (2009) Cannibalization—technical system maintenance method (in Polish). In: Proceedings of XXXVII Winter School on reliability, Szczyrk, Publishing House of Warsaw Univ. Of Technology, Warsaw, pp 230–238Google Scholar
  174. 174.
    Nowakowski T, Werbińska S (2009) On problems of multi-component system maintenance modelling. Int J Autom Comput 6(4):364–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  175. 175.
    Okoh P (2015) Maintenance grouping optimization for the management of risk in offshore riser system. Process Saf Environ Prot 98:33–39.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2015.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  176. 176.
    Okulewicz J, Salamonowicz T (2008) Preventive maintenance with imperfect repairs of a system with redundant objects. In: Proceedings of summer safety and reliability seminars SSARS 2008, 22–28 June 2008, Gdańsk-Sopot, Poland, pp 279–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  177. 177.
    Okulewicz J, Salamonowicz T (2006) Comparison of chosen preventive maintenance strategies (in Polish). In: Proceedings of XXXIV Winter School on reliability. Publishing House of Institute for Sustainable Technologies, Radom, pp 218–227Google Scholar
  178. 178.
    Okumoto K, Osaki S (1976) Repair limit replacement policies with lead time. Zeitschrift fur Oper Res 20:133–142MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  179. 179.
    Ondemir O, Gupta SM (2014) A multi-criteria decision making model for advanced repair-to-order and disassembly-to-order system. Eur J Oper Res 233:408–419.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.09.003CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  180. 180.
    Ormon SW, Cassady CR (2004) Cannibalization policies for a set of parallel machines. In: Reliability and maintainability, 2004 annual symposium—RAMS, 26–29 Jan 2004, Colorado Springs, pp 540–545Google Scholar
  181. 181.
    Ozekici S (1995) Optimal maintenance policies in random environments. Eur J Oper Res 82(2):283–294MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  182. 182.
    Park DH, Jung GM, Yum JK (2000) Cost minimization for periodic maintenance policy of a system subject to slow degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 68(2):105–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00012-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  183. 183.
    Park JH, Lee SC, Hong JW, Lie CH (2009) An optimal Block preventive maintenance policy for a multi-unit system considering imperfect maintenance. Asia-Pac J Oper Res 26(6):831–847.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S021759590900250XMathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  184. 184.
    Park M, Pham H (2016) Cost models for age replacement policies and block replacement policies under warranty. Appl Math Model 40(9–10):5689–5702.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.01.022MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  185. 185.
    Peng W, Liu Y, Zhang X, Huang H-Z (2015) Sequential preventive maintenance policies with consideration of random adjustment-reduction features. Eksploatacja i Niezawodnosc—Maint Reliab 17(2):306–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  186. 186.
    Pham H, Wang H (1999) Optimal (τ, T) opportunistic maintenance of a k-out-of-n: G system with imperfect PM and partial failure. Naval Res Logist 47:223–239MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  187. 187.
    Pham H, Wang H (1996) Imperfect maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 94:425–438zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  188. 188.
    Piasecki S (1984) Maintenance strategies for machines (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 4–26Google Scholar
  189. 189.
    Pierskalla WP, Voelker JA (1976) A survey of maintenance models: the control and surveillance of deteriorating systems. Naval Res Logist Q 23:353–388MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  190. 190.
    Pilch R (2017) Determination of preventive maintenance time for milling assemblies used in coal mills. J Mach Constr Maint 1(104):81–86Google Scholar
  191. 191.
    Pilch R, Smolnik M, Szybka J, Wiązania G (2014) Concept of preventive maintenance strategy for a chosen example of public transport vehicles (in Polish). In: Siergiejczyk M (ed) Maintenance problems of technical systems. Publishing House of Warsaw University of Science and Technology, Warsaw, pp 171–182Google Scholar
  192. 192.
    Pophaley M, Ways RK (2010) Plant maintenance management practices in automobile industries: a retrospective and literature review. J Ind Eng Manag 3(3):512–541.  https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.v3n3.p512-541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  193. 193.
    Poppe J, Basten RJI, Boute RN, Lambrecht MR (2017) Numerical study on inventory management under various maintenance policies. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 168:262–273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.06.012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  194. 194.
    Popova E (2004) Basic optimality results for Bayesian group replacement policies. Oper Res Lett 32:283–287MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  195. 195.
    Popova E, Popova I (2014) Replacement strategies. Statistics Reference Online, Wiley StatsRefGoogle Scholar
  196. 196.
    Popova E, Wilson JG (1999) Group replacement policies for parallel systems whose components have phase distributed failure times. Ann Oper Res 91:163–189MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  197. 197.
    Qian C, Nakamura S, Nakagawa T (2003) Replacement and minimal repair policies for a cumulative damage model with maintenance. Comput Math Appl 46:1111–1118MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  198. 198.
    Radner R, Jorgenson DW (1963) Opportunistic replacement of a single part in the presence of several monitored parts. Manage Sci 10(1):70–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  199. 199.
    Radner R, Jorgenson DW (1962) Optimal replacement and inspection of stochastically failing equipment. In: Arrow KJ, Karlin S, Scarf H (eds) Studies in applied probability and management science. Stanford University Press, pp 184–206Google Scholar
  200. 200.
    Rakoczy A (1980) Simulation method for technical object’s optimal preventive maintenance time assessment (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability, Szczyrk, pp 143–152Google Scholar
  201. 201.
    Rakoczy A, Żółtowski J (1977) About the issues on technical object renewal principles definition (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability, Szczyrk, pp 175–191Google Scholar
  202. 202.
    Ritchken P, Wilson JG (1990) (m, T) group maintenance policies. Manage Sci 36(5):632–639MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  203. 203.
    Salamonowicz T (2003) Methods of preventive maintenance time assessment for chosen objects’ models (in Polish). In: Proceedings of XXXI Winter School on reliability—prognostic methods in dependability engineering. Publishing House of Institute for Sustainable Technologies, Radom, pp 428–436Google Scholar
  204. 204.
    Salman S, Cassady CR, Pohl EA, Ormon SW (2007) Evaluating the impact of cannibalization on fleet performance. Qual Reliab Engineering Int 23:445–457.  https://doi.org/10.1002/qre.826CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  205. 205.
    Samhouri MS, Al-Ghandoor A, Fouad RH, Alhaj Ali SM (2009) An intelligent opportunistic maintenance (OM) system: a genetic algorithm approach. Jordan J Mech Ind Eng 3(4):246–251Google Scholar
  206. 206.
    Sandve K, Aven T (1999) Cost optimal replacement of monotone, repairable systems. Eur J Oper Res 116:235–248zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  207. 207.
    Sarkar A, Behera DK, Kumar S (2012) Maintenance policies of single and multi-unit systems in the past and present. Int J Curr Eng Technol 2(1):196–205Google Scholar
  208. 208.
    Sarkar A, Panja SCh, Sarkar B (2011) Survey of maintenance policies of the last 50 years. Int J Softw Eng Appl 2(3):130–148Google Scholar
  209. 209.
    Sarker BR, Ibn Faiz T (2016) Minimizing maintenance cost for offshore wind turbines following multi-level opportunistic preventive strategy. Renew Energy 85:104–113.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  210. 210.
    Satow T, Osaki S (2003) Opportunity-based age replacement with different intensity rates. Math Comput Model 38:1419–1426.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-7177(03)90145-2MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  211. 211.
    Scarf PA (1997) On the application of mathematical models in maintenance. Eur J Oper Res 99:493–506zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  212. 212.
    Scarf PA, Cavalcante CAV (2010) Hybrid block replacement and inspection policies for a multi-component system with heterogeneous component lives. Eur J Oper Res 206:384–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.02.024CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  213. 213.
    Scarf PA, Deara M (2003) Block replacement policies for a two-component system with failure dependence. Naval Res Logist 50:70–87.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.10051MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  214. 214.
    Scarf PA, Dwight R, Al-Musrati A (2005) On reliability criteria and the implied cost of failure for a maintained component. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 89:199–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2004.08.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  215. 215.
    Segawa Y, Ohnishi M (2000) The average optimality of a repair-limit replacement policy. Math Comput Model 31:327–334MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  216. 216.
    Segawa Y, Ohnishi M, Ibaraki T (1992) Optimal minimal-repair and replacement problem with age dependent cost structure. Comput Math Appl 24(1/2):91–101zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  217. 217.
    Sepehrifar MB, Khorshidian K, Jamshidian AR (2015) On renewal increasing mean residual life distributions: an age replacement model with hypothesis testing application. Stat Probab Lett 96:117–122.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2014.09.009MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  218. 218.
    Shafiee M, Finkelstein M (2015) An optimal age-based group maintenance policy for multi-unit degrading systems. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 134:230–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.09.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  219. 219.
    Shafiee M, Finkelstein M, Berenguer Ch (2015) An opportunistic condition-based maintenance policy for offshore wind turbine blades subjected to degradation and environmental shocks. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 142:463–471.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  220. 220.
    Shah J, Avittathur B (2007) The retailer multi-item inventory problem with demand cannibalization and substitution. Int J Prod Econ 106:104–114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.04.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  221. 221.
    Sherbrooke CC (2004) Optimal modeling inventory of systems. Multi-echelon techniques. Kluwer Academic Publishers, BostonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  222. 222.
    Sherbrooke CC (1971) An evaluator for the number of operationally ready aircraft in a multilevel supply system. Oper Res 19(3):618–635zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  223. 223.
    Sheriff YS (1982) Reliability analysis: optimal inspection & maintenance schedules of failing equipment. Microelectron Reliab 22(1):59–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  224. 224.
    Sheu S-H (1999) Extended optimal replacement model for deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res 112:503–516zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  225. 225.
    Sheu S-H (1998) A generalized age and block replacement of a system subject to shocks. Eur J Oper Res 108:345–362zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  226. 226.
    Sheu S-H (1994) Extended block replacement policy with used item and general random minimal repair cost. Eur J Oper Res 79(3):405–416zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  227. 227.
    Sheu S-H (1993) A generalized model for determining optimal number of minimal repairs before replacement. Eur J Oper Res 69:38–49zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  228. 228.
    Sheu S-H (1992) A general replacement of a system subject to shocks. Microelectron Reliab 32(5):657–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  229. 229.
    Sheu S-H (1991) A general age replacement model with minimal repair and general random repair cost. Microelectron Reliab 31(5):1009–1017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  230. 230.
    Sheu S-H (1991) Periodic replacement with minimal repair at failure and general random repair cost for a multi-unit system. Microelectron Reliab 31(5):1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  231. 231.
    Sheu S-H (1990) Periodic replacement when minimal repair costs depend on the age and the number of minimal repairs for a multi-unit system. Microelectron Reliab 30(4):713–718CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  232. 232.
    Sheu S-H, Chang Ch-Ch, Chen Y-L (2012) An extended sequential imperfect preventive maintenance model with improvement factors. Commun Stat Theory Methods 41(7):1269–1283.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03610926.2010.542852CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  233. 233.
    Sheu S-H, Chen Y-L, Chang Ch-Ch, Zhang ZG (2016) A note on a two variable block replacement policy for a system subject to non-homogeneous pure birth shocks. Appl Math Model 40(5–6):3703–3712.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.10.001MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  234. 234.
    Sheu S-H, Chien Y-H (2004) Optimal age-replacement policy of a system subject to shocks with random lead-time. Eur J Oper Res 159:132–144.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00409-0MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  235. 235.
    Sheu S-H, Griffith WS (2002) Extended block replacement policy with shock models and used items. Eur J Oper Res 140:50–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00224-7MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  236. 236.
    Sheu S-H, Griffith WS, Nakagawa T (1995) Extended optimal replacement model with random repair cost. Eur J Oper Res 85:636–649zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  237. 237.
    Sheu S-H, Jhang J-P (1996) A generalized group maintenance policy. Eur J Oper Res 96:232–247zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  238. 238.
    Sheu S-H, Lin Y-B, Liao G-L (2006) Optimum policies for a system with general imperfect maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 91(3):362–369.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2005.01.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  239. 239.
    Sheu S-H, Liou C-T (1992) An age replacement policy with minimal repair and general random repair cost. Microelectron Reliab 32(9):1283–1289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  240. 240.
    Sheu S-H, Sung Ch-K, Hsu T-S, Chen Y-Ch (2013) Age replacement policy for a two-unit system subject to non-homogeneous pure birth shocks. Appl Math Model 37:7027–7036.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.02.022MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  241. 241.
    Sheu S-H, Yeh RH, Lin Y-B, Juang M-G (2001) A Bayesian approach to an adaptive preventive maintenance model. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 71:33–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(00)00072-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  242. 242.
    Sheu S-H, Yeh RH, Lin Y-B, Juang M-G (1999) A Bayesian perspective on age replacement with minimal repair. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 65:55–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  243. 243.
    Sheu S-H, Zhang ZG, Chien Y-H, Huang T-H (2013) Age replacement policy with lead-time for a system subject to non-homogeneous pure birth shocks. Appl Math Model 37:7717–7725.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2013.03.017MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  244. 244.
    Shi H, Zeng J (2016) Real-time prediction of remaining useful life and preventive opportunistic maintenance strategy for multi-component systems considering stochastic dependence. Comput Ind Eng 93:192–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2015.12.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  245. 245.
    Sikorski M (1984) Maintenance strategy of machines (in Polish). In: Proceedings of Winter School on reliability. Center for Technical Progress, Katowice, pp 36–82Google Scholar
  246. 246.
    Silver EA, Fiechter C-N (1995) Preventive maintenance with limited historical data. Eur J Oper Res 82:125–144zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  247. 247.
    Simon RM (1970) Cannibalization policies for multicomponent systems. SIAM J Appl Math 19(4):700–711MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  248. 248.
    Taghipour S, Banjevic D (2012) Optimal inspection of a complex system subject to periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements. Eur J Oper Res 220:649–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2012.02.002MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  249. 249.
    Tambe PP, Kularni MS (2013) An opportunistic maintenance decision of a multi-component system considering the effect of failures on quality. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on engineering 2013, vol 1, WCE 2013, 3–5 July 2013, London, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  250. 250.
    Tambe PP, Mohite S, Kularni MS (2013) Optimisation of opportunistic maintenance of a multi-component system considering the effect of failures on quality and production schedule: a case study. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5):1743–1756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  251. 251.
    Thomas LC (1986) A survey of maintenance and replacement models for maintainability and reliability of multi-item systems. Reliab Eng 16(4):297–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  252. 252.
    Tsai Y-T, Wang K-S, Teng H-Y (2001) Optimizing preventive maintenance for mechanical components using genetic algorithms. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 74:89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(01)00065-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  253. 253.
    Valdez-Flores C, Feldman R (1989) A survey of preventive maintenance models for stochastically deteriorating single-unit systems. Naval Res Logist 36:419–446MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  254. 254.
    Van Der Duyn Schouten DA, Vanneste SG (1990) Analysis and computation of (n, N)-strategies for maintenance of a two-component system. Eur J Oper Res 48:260–274zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  255. 255.
    Van Dijkhuizen GC, Van Harten A (1998) Two-stage generalized age maintenance of a queue-like production system. Eur J Oper Res 108:363–378zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  256. 256.
    Van Horenbeek A, Bure J, Cattrysse D, Pintelon L, Vansteenwegen P (2013) Joint maintenance and inventory optimization systems: a review. Int J Prod Econ 143:499–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.04.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  257. 257.
    Van Noortwijk JM (2009) A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 94:2–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2007.03.019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  258. 258.
    Vasili M, Hond TS, Ismail N, Vasili M (2011) Maintenance optimization models: a review and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2011 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Juala Lumbpur, Malaysia, Jan 22–24 2011, pp 1131–1138Google Scholar
  259. 259.
    Vaurio JK (1999) Availability and cost functions for periodically inspected preventively maintained units. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 63:133–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(98)00030-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  260. 260.
    Vu HC, Do P, Barros A, Berenguer Ch (2014) Maintenance grouping strategy for multi-component systems with dynamic contexts. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 132:233–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2014.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  261. 261.
    Wang H (2002) A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems. Eur J Oper Res 139(3):469–489.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00197-7CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  262. 262.
    Wang H, Pham H (2006) Reliability and optimal maintenance. Springer, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  263. 263.
    Wang H, Pham H (2003) Optimal imperfect maintenance models. In: Pham H (ed) Handbook of reliability engineering. Springer, London, pp 397–414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  264. 264.
    Wang H, Pham H (1997) A survey of reliability and availability evaluation of complex networks using Monte Carlo techniques. Microelectron Reliab 37(2):187–209.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0026-2714(96)00058-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  265. 265.
    Wells ChE (2014) Reliability analysis of a single warm-standby system subject to repairable and non-repairable failures. Eur J Oper Res 235:180–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.027CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  266. 266.
    Werbińska-Wojciechowska S (2014) Multicomponent technical systems maintenance models—state of art (in Polish). In: Siergiejczyk M (ed) Technical systems maintenance problems: monograph (in Polish). Publishing House of Warsaw Univ. Of Technology, Warsaw, pp 25–57Google Scholar
  267. 267.
    Wildeman RE, Dekker R, Smit ACJM (1997) A dynamic policy for grouping maintenance activities. Eur J Oper Res 99:530–551zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  268. 268.
    Wu J, Ng TSA, Xie M, Huang H-Z (2010) Analysis of maintenance policies for finite life-cycle multi-state systems. Comput Ind Eng 59:638–646.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2010.07.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  269. 269.
    Wu S, Clements-Croome D (2005) Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quantity. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 90:99–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  270. 270.
    Wu S, Zuo MJ (2010) Linear and nonlinear preventive maintenance models. IEEE Trans Reliab 59(1):242–249.  https://doi.org/10.1109/tr.2010.2041972CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  271. 271.
    Xia T, Jin X, Xi L, Ni J (2015) Production-driven opportunistic maintenance for batch production based on MAM-APB scheduling. Eur J Oper Res 240:781–790.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.08.004MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  272. 272.
    Xiao L, Song S, Chen X, Coit DW (2016) Joint optimization of production scheduling and machine group preventive maintenance. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 146:68–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  273. 273.
    Yasui K, Nakagawa T, Osaki S (1988) A summary of optimum replacement policies for a parallel redundant system. Microelectronic Reliab 28(4):635–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  274. 274.
    Yeh RH (1997) State-age-dependent maintenance policies for deteriorating systems with Erlang sojourn time distributions. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 58:55–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  275. 275.
    Yun WY (1989) An age replacement policy with increasing minimal repair cost. Microelectron Reliab 29(2):153–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  276. 276.
    Yun WY, Bai DS (1988) Repair cost limit replacement policy under imperfect inspection. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 23:59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  277. 277.
    Yun WY, Bai DS (1987) Cost limit replacement policy under imperfect repair. Reliab Eng 19:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  278. 278.
    Yusuf I, Ali UA (2012) Structural dependence replacement model for parallel system of two units. J Basic Appl Sci 20(4):324–326Google Scholar
  279. 279.
    Zamojski W (1984) Maintenance strategies for machines (some mathematical models) (in Polish). In: Proceedings Winter School on reliability. Technical Progress Center, Katowice, pp 27–41Google Scholar
  280. 280.
    Zamojski W, Mazurkiewicz J (2011) From reliability to system dependability—theory and models. In: Summer safety and reliability seminars, SSARS 2011, Gdańsk-Sopot, Poland, pp 223–232Google Scholar
  281. 281.
    Zequeira RI, Berenguer C (2005) A block replacement policy for a periodically inspected two-unit parallel standby safety system. In: Kołowrocki K (ed) Advances in safety and reliability—proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference (ESREL 2005), Gdynia-Sopot-Gdańsk, Poland, 27–30 June 2005. A.A. Balkema, Leiden, pp 2091–2098Google Scholar
  282. 282.
    Zequeira RI, Berenguer C (2004) Maintenance cost analysis of a two-component parallel system with failure interaction. In: Proceedings of reliability and maintainability, 2004 annual symposium—RAMS, pp 220–225Google Scholar
  283. 283.
    Zequeira RI, Valdes JE, Berenguer C (2008) Optimal buffer inventory and opportunistic preventive maintenance under random production capacity availability. Int J Prod Econ 111:686–696.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.037CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  284. 284.
    Zhang T, Cheng Z, Liu Y-J, Guo B (2012) Maintenance scheduling for multi-unit system: a stochastic Petri-net and genetic algorithm based approach. Eksploatacja i Niezawodność Maint Reliab 14(3):256–264Google Scholar
  285. 285.
    Zhang X, Zeng J (2015) A general modelling method for opportunistic maintenance modelling of multi-unit systems. Reliabi Eng Syst Safety 140:176–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  286. 286.
    Zhao YX (2003) On preventive maintenance policy of a critical reliability level for system subject to degradation. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 79:301–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0951-8320(02)00201-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  287. 287.
    Zhao X, Al-Khalifa KN, Hamouda AM, Nakagawa T (2017) Age replacement models: a summary with new perspectives and methods. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 161:95–105.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  288. 288.
    Zhao X, Al-Khalifa KN, Nakagawa T (2015) Approximate method for optimal replacement, maintenance, and inspection policies. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 144:68–73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  289. 289.
    Zhao X, Mizutani S, Nakagawa T (2015) Which is better for replacement policies with continuous or discrete scheduled times? Eur J Oper Res 242:477–486.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2014.11.018MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  290. 290.
    Zhao X, Qian C, Nakagawa T (2017) Comparisons of replacement policies with periodic times and repair numbers. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 168:161–170.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2017.05.015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  291. 291.
    Zheng X, Fard N (1991) A maintenance policy for repairable systems based on opportunistic failure-rate tolerance. IEEE Trans Reliab 40(2):237–244zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  292. 292.
    Zhou X, Huang K, Xi L, Lee J (2015) Preventive maintenance modeling for multi-component systems with considering stochastic failures and disassembly sequence. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 142:231–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.05.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  293. 293.
    Zhou X, Lu Z-Q, Xi L-F, Lee J (2010) Opportunistic preventive maintenance optimization for multi-unit series systems with combing multi-preventive maintenance techniques. J Shanghai Jiaotong Univ 15(5):513–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  294. 294.
    Zhou X, Xi L, Lee J (2006) A dynamic opportunistic maintenance policy for continuously monitored systems. J Qual Maint Eng 12(3):294–305.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13552510610685129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  295. 295.
    Zoltowski M, Hadzima B, Zoltowski B (2016) Elements of applied mechanics used in engineering of technical systems degradation diagnostics (in Polish). In: Knosal R (ed) Innovations in production engineering and management 2. Publishing House of Polish Association of Production Management, Opole, pp 651–663Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wroclaw University of Science and TechnologyWroclawPoland

Personalised recommendations