Advertisement

Orchestrating Learning as an Emergent Practice in the Use of Location-Based Games with Mobile Devices

  • Jimmy JaldemarkEmail author
  • Sofia Eriksson Bergström
  • Peter Mozelius
Chapter

Abstract

This study discusses the inclusion of location-based games and mobile devices in an educational setting that embraces both indoor and outdoor sessions. The study was built on a framework including learning as a social and collaborative phenomenon. Two case units, in terms of a fifth grade Social Science class and a sixth grade Mathematics class, were included in the study. Each case unit embraced an indoor preparing session, an outdoor session including mobile devices and the location-based game Pokémon GO, and an indoor follow-up session. The chapter aims at contributing to the understanding of how students and teachers together, in an emergent practice of orchestrating learning, apply mobile devices and location-based games in their educational setting. From this aim, the following research question unfolds: How could location-based games and mobile devices be applied by students and teachers to orchestrate learning in middle school settings? Data were gathered by semi-structured group interviews and video recordings with 20 students and two teachers. Moreover, documents such as lesson plans were included in the dataset. In the study, it was found that students and teachers participated in a shared and emerging practice of orchestrating learning and teaching. In this practice students and teachers acted as co-designers to orchestrate the application of location-based games and mobile devices in the educational setting. Findings suggest that an orchestration including a combination of a collaborative approach to learning, location-based games and activities that embrace outdoor and indoor sessions has the potential to vitalize and enhance traditional classroom-based education. However, there is not a guarantee that all students will concentrate on the given task, and just as in an ordinary classroom setting, teaching and learning also require careful orchestration.

Keywords

Childhood Game-based learning Learning Location-based games Middle school Mobile devices Mobile learning Orchestration Outdoor education Smartphones 

References

  1. Avouris, N. M., & Yiannoutsou, N. (2012). A review of mobile location-based games for learning across physical and virtual spaces. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 18(15), 2120–2142.Google Scholar
  2. Barnes, R. H. (1975). Mancala in Kédang: A structural test. Anthropologica, XVII, 67–85.Google Scholar
  3. Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2015). Multimodality, learning and communication: A social semiotic frame. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bleumers, L., Mariën, I., Van Looy, J., Stewart, J., Schurmans, D., & All, A. (2013). Best practices for deploying digital games for personal empowerment and social inclusion. Paper presented at the European Conference on Games Based Learning, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  5. Blunt, R. (2007). Does game-based learning work? Results from three recent studies. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, & Education Conference, Orlando, FL.Google Scholar
  6. Bond, E. (2014). Childhood, mobile technologies and everyday experiences: Changing technologies = changing childhoods? New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carreiro, K. (2005). Learning more walking between classes. Journal of Philosophy and History of Education, 55, 31–48.Google Scholar
  8. Cerratto Pargman, T., Jahnke, I., Damsa, C., Nussbaum, M., & Säljö, R. (2017). Emergent practices and material conditions in tablet-mediated collaborative learning and teaching. In B. K. Smith, M. Borge, E. Mercier, & K. Y. Lim (Eds.), 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, CSCL 2017 (Vol. 2, pp. 905–909). Philadelphia, PA: ISLS.Google Scholar
  9. Charsky, D., & Mims, C. (2008). Integrating commercial off-the-shelf video games into school curriculums. TechTrends, 52(5), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Colley, A., Thebault-Spieker, J., Lin, A. Y., Degraen, D., Fischman, B., Häkkilä, J., et al. (2017, 6–11 May). The geography of Pokémon GO: Beneficial and problematic effects on places and movement. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Denver, CO.Google Scholar
  11. Corsaro, W. A. (2011). The sociology of childhood (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge.Google Scholar
  12. D’Angour, A. (2013). Plato and play: Taking education seriously in ancient Greece. American Journal of Play, 5(3), 293–307.Google Scholar
  13. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Introduction: What do you mean by collaborative learning? In P. Dillenbourg (Ed.), Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches (pp. 1–19). Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  14. Eriksson-Bergström, S., & Jaldemark, J. (2017, 30 October–1 November). Students’ expressions of learning on the move: Game-based learning and mobile devices in formal outdoor educational settings. Paper presented at the 16th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning, Nicosia, Cyprus.Google Scholar
  15. Gitz-Johansen, T., Kampmann, J., & Kirkeby, I. M. (2001). Samspil mellem børn og skolens fysiske ramme. Hørsholm, Denmark: Rum, Form, Funktion.Google Scholar
  16. Hamari, J., Shernoff, D. J., Rowe, E., Coller, B., Asbell-Clarke, J., & Edwards, T. (2016). Challenging games help students learn: An empirical study on engagement, flow and immersion in game-based learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 170–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Howland, J. L., Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. (2012). Meaningful learning with technology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, H.-C., Wong, M.-K., Lu, J., Huang, W.-F., & Teng, C.-I. (2017). Can using exergames improve physical fitness? A 12-week randomized controlled trial. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 310–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huizenga, J., Admiraal, W., Akkerman, S., & Dam, G. (2009). Mobile game-based learning in secondary education: Engagement, motivation and learning in a mobile city game. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 25(4), 332–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Huizinga, J. (1955/1938). Homo ludens: A study of the play element in culture. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  21. Jahnke, I., Bergström, P., Mårell-Olsson, E., Häll, L., & Kumar, S. (2017). Digital didactical designs as research framework: iPad integration in Nordic schools. Computers & Education, 113, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jaldemark, J. (2018). Contexts of learning and challenges of mobility: Designing for a blur between formal and informal learning. In S. Yu, M. Ally, & A. Tsinakos (Eds.), Mobile and ubiquitous learning: An international handbook (pp. 141–155). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jaldemark, J., Eriksson-Bergström, S., von Zeipel, H., & Westman, A.-K. (in press). Wearable technologies as a research tool for studying learning: The application of spy glasses in data collection of children’s learning. In A. Zhang & D. Christol (Eds.), Handbook of mobile teaching and learning (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Laine, T. H., & Sedano, C. I. (2015). Distributed pervasive worlds: The case of exergames. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(1), 50–66.Google Scholar
  25. Littleton, K., Scanlon, E., & Sharples, M. (2012). Orchestrating inquiry learning. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Malone, T. W. (1981). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive science, 5(4), 333–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Malone, T. W., & Lepper, M. R. (1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In R. E. Snow & M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol. 3: Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223–253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Mozelius, P., Eriksson-Bergström, S., & Jaldemark, J. (2017, 16–18 November). Learning by walking: Pokémon GO and mobile technology in formal education. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of Education, Research and Innovation, Valencia, Spain.Google Scholar
  29. Mozelius, P., & Olsson, M. (2017, 5–6 October). Learning to program by building learning games. Paper presented at the ECGBL 2017 11th European Conference on Game-Based Learning, Graz. Austria.Google Scholar
  30. Murray, H. J. R. (2015). A history of chess. (The original 1913 ed.). New York, NY: Skyhorse.Google Scholar
  31. Paavilainen, J., Hamari, J., Stenros, J., & Kinnunen, J. (2013). Social network games: Players’ perspectives. Simulation & Gaming, 44(6), 794–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Papastergiou, M. (2009). Digital game-based learning in high school computer science education: Impact on educational effectiveness and student motivation. Computers & Education, 52(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pocock, R. W. (2002). Education system and method for home schoolers and the like. In U. S. P. a. T. Office (Ed.), Education system and method for home schoolers and the like. (Vol. U.S. Patent No. 6,464,505). Alexandria, VA: U. S. P. a. T. Office.Google Scholar
  34. Qvortrup, J., Corsaro, W. A., & Honig, M.-S. (2009). The Palgrave handbook of childhood studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rodriguez, H. (2006). The playful and the serious: An approximation to Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. Game Studies: The International Journal of Computer Game Research, 6(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  36. Salen, K., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Boston, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
  37. Schiller, F. (1982/1794). On the aesthetic education of man: In a series of letters (E. M. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby, Trans. E. M. Wilkinson & L. A. Willoughby Eds.). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  38. Serino, M., Cordrey, K., McLaughlin, L., & Milanaik, R. L. (2016). Pokémon Go and augmented virtual reality games: A cautionary commentary for parents and pediatricians. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 28(5), 673–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sharples, M., & Spikol, D. (2017). Mobile learning. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, & R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning: Research themes (pp. 89–96). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Traxler, J., & Kukulska-Hulme, A. (Eds.). (2016). Mobile learning: The next generation. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Tremblay, M. S., & Willms, J. D. (2003). Is the Canadian childhood obesity epidemic related to physical inactivity? International Journal of Obesity, 27(9), 1100–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Eck, R. (2006). Digital game-based learning: It’s not just the digital natives who are restless. Educause Review, 41(2), 1–16.Google Scholar
  43. Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wong, F. Y. (2017). Influence of Pokémon Go on physical activity levels of university players: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Health Geographics, 16(8), 1–12.Google Scholar
  46. Zsila, Á., Orosz, G., Bőthe, B., Tóth-Király, I., Király, O., Griffiths, M., et al. (2018). An empirical study on the motivations underlying augmented reality games: The case of Pokémon Go during and after Pokémon fever. Personality and Individual Differences, 133, 56–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jimmy Jaldemark
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sofia Eriksson Bergström
    • 1
  • Peter Mozelius
    • 2
  1. 1.Mid Sweden UniversitySundsvallSweden
  2. 2.Mid Sweden UniversityÖstersundSweden

Personalised recommendations