Advertisement

Corporate Wrongdoing and Reputational Risk: A Genealogical Analysis of Toyota’s Recall Crisis in 2010

  • Nobuyuki ChikudateEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Governance, Leadership and Responsibility book series (PSGLR)

Abstract

Many Japanese corporations that demonstrated wrongdoings have poorly responded to public criticism and were subsequently dragged into various corporate crises. The managers in these corporations did not speak or behave in a responsible manner during the crises. In addition, they also offered negative views on corporate social responsibility (CSR) years before the crisis, disqualifying them from being considered responsible corporate citizens. By using a genealogical analysis, the author investigates their views on CSR and CSR-related activities before the crisis. In this study, the author conducts an analysis of Toyota’s recall crisis in 2010 as an example.

Keywords

Corporate wrongdoings Reputational risk Corporate crisis CSR Ethics Stakeholder Toyota 

References

  1. A to Z. 2010. “A to Z,” aired by NHK, February 20.Google Scholar
  2. ABC News. 2010a. “ABC News,” aired by ABC, New York, January 29.Google Scholar
  3. ABC News. 2010b. “ABC News,” aired by ABC, New York, February 3.Google Scholar
  4. Asahi Shimbun Evening Issue. 2006. Toyota Seisaikin Shiharai [Toyota Paid Fine], May 19.Google Scholar
  5. Asahi Shimbun Morning Issue. 2003. Kigyo no Seijikenkin Fukkatsu o Aratamete Hyoumei Okuda Keidanren Kaichō [Reviving Manifestation of Political Donation, Okuda Chairperson of Keidanren], May 28.Google Scholar
  6. Asahi Shimbun Morning Issue. 2006. Toyota 96nen ni Kairyōhin [Toyota Remodeled in 1996], July 12.Google Scholar
  7. Asahi Shimbun Morning Issue. 2008. Kōrōshō Tataki Ijyo Masukomi ni Hōhuku demo [Abnormal Media Basing Against Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. So Shall I Retaliate on the Media?], November 13.Google Scholar
  8. Asahi Shimbun Morning Issue. 2010. Toyota Kanban nimo Kizu [Stain on Toyota’s Reputation], February 4.Google Scholar
  9. Avi-Yonah, Reuvan S. 2010. Citizens United and the Corporate Form. Wisconsin Law Review 4: 999–1047.Google Scholar
  10. Benoit, William L. 1995. Accounts, Excuses, and Apologies: A Theory of Image Restoration Strategies. Albany, NY. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  11. Bhattacharya, C.B., and Sanker Sen. 2004. Doing Better at Doing Good: When, Why, and How Consumers Respond to Corporate Social Initiatives. California Management Review 47: 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CBS News. 2010. Toyota Has Donated to Investigating Reps. Last modified February 23. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/toyota-has-donated-to-investigating-reps.
  13. CBS News. 2011. Electronics Not at Fault in Toyota Deaths. Last modified February 8. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/electronics-not-at-fault-in-toyota-deaths.
  14. Chikudate, Nobuyuki. 2002. Collective Myopia and Disciplinary Power Behind the Scenes of Unethical Practices: A Diagnostic Theory on Japanese Organization. Journal of Management Studies 39: 289–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chikudate, Nobuyuki. 2010. Reinterpreting Corporate Apologia as Self-Discipline. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 15: 397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chikudate, Nobuyuki. 2011. Collapsed Buffer, Reputation, and Instrumental CSR: Toyota Recall Crisis in 2010. Paper presented at CSR Communication Conference, Amsterdam, October 26–28.Google Scholar
  17. Chikudate, Nobuyuki. 2015. Collective Myopia in Japanese Organizations: A Transcultural Approach for Identifying Corporate Meltdowns. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Cornelissen, Joep. 2011. Corporate Communication: A Guide to Theory and Practice, 3rd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Deephouse, David L. 1996. Does Isomorphism Legitimate? Academy of Management Journal 39: 1024–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Donaldson, Thomas, and Patricia Werhane. 1988. Ethical Issues and Business. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, R. Edward. 2010. Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Friedman, Milton. 1970. The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profit. The New York Times Magazine, September 13: 32–33, 122, 124, 126.Google Scholar
  23. Gardberg, Naomi, A., and Charles, J. Fombrun. 2006. Corporate Citizenship: Creating Intangible Assets Across Institutional Environments. Academy of Management Review 3: 329–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Postmetaphysical Thinking, trans. William M. Hohengarten. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hearit, Keith M. 1995. ‘Mistakes Were Made’: Organizations, Apologia, and Crises of Social Legitimacy. Communication Studies 46: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hōdō Station. 2010. “Hōdō Station,” aired by TV Asahi, March 3.Google Scholar
  27. Keidanren. 2011. Keidanren Homepage. Accessed September 1, 2011. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/indexj.html.
  28. Keidanren. 2017. Keidanren Homepage. Accessed August 9, 2017. http://www.keidanren.or.jp/en/profile/pro001.html.
  29. Kendall, Gavin, and Gary Wickham. 1999. Using Foucault’s Methods. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinoshita, Takayuki. 2010. Toyoda Akio no Ningen-ryoku [Characteristics of Akio Toyoda]. Tokyo: Gakken Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Liker, Jeffery K., and Timothy N. Ogden. 2011. Toyota Under Fire. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  32. Linstead, Stephen A. 2001. Rhetoric and Organizational Control: A Framework for Analysis. In The Language of Organization, ed. Robert Westwood and Stephen Linstead, 217–240. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  33. Maclagan, Patrick. 2008. Organizations and Responsibility: A Critical Overview. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 25: 371–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Tourism (MLIT). 2010. Press Conference on February 5. Accessed September 1, 2010. http://www.mlit.go.jp/report/interview/daijin100205.html.
  35. Mitchell, Ronald K., Bradley R. Agle, and Donna J. Wood. 1997. Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22: 853–886.Google Scholar
  36. News 9. 2010a. “News 9,” aired by NHK, February 18.Google Scholar
  37. News 9. 2010b. “News 9,” aired by NHK, February 24.Google Scholar
  38. Nihon Keizai Shimbun Morning Issue. 2003. Ichiban Hachō Au no wa Jimin [The Most Favorite Is LDP], October 21.Google Scholar
  39. Nihon Keizai Shimbun Morning Issue. 2008. Kōrōshō Tataki Okudashi Ijo [Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Bashing, Abnormal Mr. Okuda], November 13.Google Scholar
  40. Nihon Keizai Shimbun Morning Issue. 2010. Minshu Keizaikai ni Sekkin [DPJ Approaches Business World], October 27.Google Scholar
  41. Reason, James. 1990. Human Error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ripken, Susanna. 2009. Corporations Are People Too: A Multi-dimensional Approach to the Corporate Personhood Puzzle. Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law 15: 97–177.Google Scholar
  43. Saporito, Bill. 2010. Toyota’s Brown Engine. Time Magazine (Asian ed.), February 22: 2–16.Google Scholar
  44. Schultz, Friederike, Sonja Utz, and Anja Goritz. 2011. Is the Medium the Message? Perceptions of and Reactions to Crisis Communication via Twitter, Blogs and Traditional Media. Public Relations Review 37: 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Schultz, Pamela D. 1996. The Morally Accountable Corporation: A Postmodern Approach to Organizational Responsibility. The Journal of Business Communication 33: 165–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shukan Diamond. 2011. Shimbun, Terebi Shōsha Naki Shōmōsen [Newspapers, TV, War of Attrition Without Winners], January 15: 28–65.Google Scholar
  47. Sunday Project. 2010. “Sunday Project,” aired by TV Asahi, February 28.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, M. 2009. Civil Society as a Rhetorical Public Relations Process. In Rhetorical and Critical Approaches to Public Relations II, ed. Robert L. Heath, Elizabeth L. Toh, and Damion Waymer, 76–91. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  49. Toyota Motor Corporation. 2008. CSR Policy: Contribution Towards Sustainable Development. Accessed September 30, 2008. http://www.toyota.co.jp/en/vision/sustainability/index.html.
  50. Toyota Motor Corporation. 2018. Guiding Principles at Toyota. Accessed June 11, 2018. http://www.toyota-global.com/pages/contents/company/vision_philosophy/pdf/guiding_principles.pdf.
  51. Ulmer, Robert R., Timothy L. Sellnow, and Matthew W. Seeger. 2011. Effective Crisis Communication: Moving from Crisis to Opportunity, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  52. Vanhamme, Joëlle, and Bas Grobben. 2009. Too Good to Be True! The Effectiveness of CSR History in Countering Negative Publicity. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Waddock, Sandra A. 2002. Leading Corporate Citizens: Vision, Values, Value Added. Boston: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Windsor, Duane. 2006. Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Management Studies 43: 93–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yokota, Hajime, and Makoto Sataka. 2006. Toyota no Shoutai [Toyota’s True Characteristics]. Tokyo: Kabushikigaisha Kinyobi.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Hiroshima UniversityHiroshima-CityJapan

Personalised recommendations