Advertisement

Identifying Disguised Objectives of IT Deployment Through Action Research

  • Peter Bou Saba
  • Mario SabaEmail author
  • Antoine Harfouche
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation book series (LNISO, volume 30)

Abstract

Little research in IS has examined the contagion mechanisms of conflicts during IT deployment between organizational members in a network. A focus on an organizational network’s contagion mechanisms is important to anticipate potential contagious conflicts that may lead to the failure of a mutual IT project. The paper delivers the results of a 4-year action research project conducted at a leading French federation of agriculture cooperatives. The study reveals that identifying contagion mechanisms at the very preliminary phases of implementation may be strategic for a successful IT deployment, despite the tools’ imperfections. Destabilizing “automatic” conflict contagion between cooperatives have led to engaging contagious survival mechanisms, limiting conflict contagion and accelerating the tool’s adoption. For IS managers and practitioners, considering conflict contagion in the translation process, one can work to more actively contain and resolve conflicts before they have a chance to affect the rest of the members.

Keywords

Conflict contagion Organizational network Agricultural cooperatives Actor network theory 

References

  1. 1.
    Greer, L.L., Jehn, K.A.: The pivotal role of emotion in intragroup process conflict. Res. Manag. Groups Teams 10, 23–45 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jehn, K., Rispens, S., Jonsen, K., Greer, L.: Conflict contagion: a temporal perspective on the development of conflict within teams. Int. J. Conflict Manag. 24(4), 352–373 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Latour, B.: The powers of association. power, action and belief. A new sociology of knowledge?. Soc. Rev. Monogr. 32, 264–280 (1986)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Connolly, T., Aberg, L.: Some contagion models of speeding. Accid. Anal. Prev. 25(1), 57–66 (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    De Dreu, C., Weingart, L.: Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(4), 741–749 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Wit, F., Greer, L., Jehn, K.: The paradox of intragroup conflict: a meta analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 97(2), 360–390 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lapointe, L., Beaudry, A.: Identifying IT user mindsets: acceptance, resistance and ambivalence. In: HICSS, 2014, 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 4619–4628 (2014)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meissonier, R., Houzé, E.: Toward an ‘IT Conflict Resistance Theory’: action research during IT pre implementation. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 19(5), 540–561 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barsade, S.: The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior. Adm. Sci. Q. 47(4), 6–44 (2002)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kelly, J.R., Barsade, S.G.: Mood and emotion in small groups and work teams. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 86, 99–130 (2001)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pugh, S.D.: Service with a smile: Emotional contagion in the service encounter. Acad. Manag. J. 44(5), 1018–1027 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Marsden, P.S.: Operationalising memetics suicide, the Werther effect, and the work of David P. Phillips. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Congress on Cybernetics, Namur, Belgium (1998)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levy, D.A., Nail, P.R.: Contagion: a theoretical and empirical review and reconceptualization. Genet. Soc. Gen. Psychol. Monogr. 119, 233–284 (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Phillips, W.A.: On the distinction between sensory storage and short term visual memory. Percept. Psychophys. 16, 283–290 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pfefferbaum, B., Pfefferbaum, R.L: Contagion in stress: an infectious disease model for posttraumatic stress in children. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 7(1), 1–83 (1998)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Showalter, E.: Hystories. Columbia University Press, NY (1997)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Colligan, M.J., Pennebaker, J., Murphy, L.R.: Mass Psychogenic Illness. Routledge, NY (1982)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Houran, J., Lange, R.: Hauntings and poltergeist like episodes as a confluence of conventional phenomena: a general hypothesis. Percept. and Mot. Skill 83(2), 1307–1316 (1996)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kerckhoff, A.C., Back, K.W.: The June Bug: A Study in Hysterical Contagion. Appleton Century Crofts, NY (1968)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Higgins, L., Range, L.M.: Does information that a suicide victim was psychiatrically disturbed reduce the likelihood of contagion? J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 26(9), 781–785 (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Phillips, D.P.: The impact of mass media violence on U.S. homicides. Am. Soc. Rev. 48, 560–568 (1983)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Goethals, G.R., Perlstein, A.L.: Level of instigation and model similarity as determinants of aggressive behavior. Aggressive Behav. 4, 115–124 (1978)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wheeler, L., Caggiula, A.R.: The contagion of aggression. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2, 1–10 (1966)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bandura, A., Ross, D., Ross, S.: Imitations of aggressive film mediated models. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 66, 3–11 (1963)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ennett, S.T., Flewelling, R.L., Lindrooth, R.C., Norton, E.C.: School and neighborhood characteristics associated with school rates of alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use. J. Health Soc. Behav. 38(1), 55–71 (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jones, M.B., Jones, D.R.: Preferred pathways of behavioural contagion. J. Psychiatr. Res. 29(3), 193–209 (1995)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodgers, J.L., Rowe, D.C.: Social contagion and adolescent sexual behavior, a developmental EMOSA model. Psychol. Rev. 100(3), 479–510 (1993)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rogers, E.M.: The Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edn. The Free Press, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bass, F.M., Mahajan, V., Muller, E.: New product diffusion models in marketing: a review and directions for research. J. Mark. 54(1), 1–26 (1990)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rapoport, A.: Mathematical Models in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Wiley, NY (1983)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rashevsky, N.: Mathematical Biophysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1939)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rashevsky, N.: Mathematical Biology of Social Behavior. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1951)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lux, T.: The socio dynamics of speculative markets: interacting agents, chaos, and the fat tails of return distribution. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 33(2), 143–165 (1998)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Temzelides, T.: Evolution, coordination, and banking panics. J. Monetary Econ. 40(1), 163–183 (1997)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Orlean, A.: Contagion of opinion in financial markets. Revue Economique 43(4), 685–698 (1992)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Phillips, K.W., Loyd, D.L.: When surface and deep level diversity collide: the effects on dissenting group members. Organ. Behav. and Hum. Decis. Process. 99, 143–160 (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Yang, J., Mossholder, K.W.: Decoupling task and relationship conflict, the role of intragroup emotional processing. J. Organ. Behav. 25, 589–605 (2004)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Humphrey, R.H., Burch, G.F., Adams, L.L.: The benefits of merging leadership research and emotions research. Front. Psychol. 7, 10–22 (2016)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tee, E.Y.J.: The emotional link: leadership and the role of implicit and explicit emotional contagion processes across multiple organizational levels. Leadersh. Q. 26, 654–670 (2015)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Arizmendi, T.G.: Linking mechanisms: emotional contagion, empathy, and imagery. Psychoanal. Psychol. 28, 405–419 (2011)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    McIntosh, D.N.: Spontaneous facial mimicry, liking and emotional contagion. Pol. Psychol. Bull. 37, 31–42 (2006)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Chartrand, T.L., Bargh, J.A.: The chameleon effect: the perception behavior link and social interaction. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 893–910 (1999)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Trout, D.L., Rosenfeld, H.M.: The effect of postural lean and body congruence on the judgment of psychotherapeutic rapport. J. Nonverbal Behav. 4, 176–190 (1980)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Tee, E.Y.J., Ashkanasy, N.M., Paulsen, N.: The influence of follower mood on leader mood and task performance: an affective, follower centric perspective of leadership. Leadersh. Q. 24, 496–515 (2013)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Eid, M., Diener, E.: Intra individual variability in affect: reliability, validity, and personality correlates. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 76, 662–676 (1999)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bolger, N., Schilling, E.A.: Personality and the problems of everyday life: The role of neuroticism in exposure and reactivity to daily stressors. J. Pers. 59, 355–386 (1991)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A.: Negative affectivity: the disposition to experience aversive emotional states. Psychol. Bull. 96, 465–490 (1984)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sy, T., Choi, J.N.: Contagious leaders and followers: exploring multistage mood contagion in a leader activation and member propagation (LAMP) model. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 122, 127–140 (2013)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Johnson, S.K.: I second that emotion: Effects of emotional contagion and affect at work on leader and follower outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 19, 1–19 (2008)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Awamleh, R., Gardner, W.L.: Perceptions of leader charisma and effectiveness: The effects of vision content, delivery, and organizational performance. Leadersh. Q. 10, 345–373 (1999)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Conger, J.A., Kanungo, R.N.: Charismatic Leadership in Organisations. Sage, California (1998)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bass, B.M.: Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations. Free Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Seger, C.R., Smith, E.R., Mackie, D.M.: Subtle activation of a social categorization triggers group level emotions. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 45, 460–467 (2009)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Anderson, C., Keltner, D., John, O.P.: Emotional convergence between people over time. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84, 1054–1068 (2003)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Totterdell, P.: Catching moods and hitting runs: mood linkage and subjective performance in professional sports teams. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85, 848–859 (2000)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hong, Y., Liao, H., Hu, J., Jiang, K.: Missing link in the service profit chain: A meta analytic review of the antecedents, consequences, and moderators of service climate. J. Appl. Psychol. 98, 237–267 (2013)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Hill, A.L., Rand, D.G., Nowak, M.A., Christakis, N.A.: Emotions as infectious diseases in a large social network: the SISa model. Proc. R. Soc. 277, 3827–3853 (2010)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Dasborough, M.T., Ashkanasy, N.M., Tee, E.Y.J., Tse, H.H.M.: What goes around comes around: how mesolevel negative emotional contagion can ultimately determine organisational attitudes toward leaders. Leadersh. Q. 20, 571–585 (2009)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Fowler, J.H., Christakis, N.A.: Dynamic spread of happiness over a large social network: longitudinal analysis over 20 years of the Framingham Heart Study. Br. Med. J. 3–37 (2008)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ashkanasy, N.M., Nicholson, G.J.: Climate of fear in organizational settings: construct definition, measurement and test of theory. Aust. J. Psychol. 55, 24–49 (2003)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M.: Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1980)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Lapointe, L., Rivard, S.: A multilevel model of resistance to information technology implementation. MIS Q. 29(3), 461–491 (2005)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Robbins, S.P.: Managing Organizational Conflict. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1974)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Jehn, K., Bendersky, C.: Intragroup conflict in organizations: a contingency perspective on the conflict outcome relationship. Res. Organ. Behav. 25, 187–242 (2003)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Walton, R.E., Dutton, J.M., Cafferty, T.P.: Organizational context and interdepartmental conflict. Adm. Sci. Q. 14(4), 522–543 (1969)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Li, J., Hambrick, D.: Factional groups: a new vantage on demographic fault lines, conflict, and disintegration in work teams. Acad. Manag. J. 48(5), 794–813 (2005)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Lewin, K., Lewin, G.: Resolving social conflicts. Harper, New York (1948)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Langfred, C.: The paradox of self management: individual and group autonomy in work groups. J. Organ. Behav. 21(5), 563–585 (2000)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hackman, R.J.: The design of work teams. In: Lorsch, J.W. (ed.) Handbook of Organizational Behavior, pp. 315–342. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1987)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Manag. Sci. 35(8), 982–1003 (1989)Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Markus, M., Axline, S., Petrie, D., Tanis, C.: Learning from adopters’ experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved. J. Inf. Technol. 15(4), 245–265 (2000)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Besson, P., Rowe, F.: ERP project dynamics and enacted dialogue. SIGMIS Database 32(4), 47 (2001)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Lim, E., Pan, S., Tan, C.: Managing user acceptance towards enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems, an understanding the dissonance between user expectations and managerial policies. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 14(2), 135–149 (2005)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Trice, H.M., Beyer, J.M.: The Cultures Work Organ. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1993)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Stewart, K.J., Gosain, S.: The impact of ideology on effectiveness in open source software development teams. MIS Q. 30(2), 291–314 (2006)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Markus, M.: Power, politics, and MIS implementation. Commun. ACM 26(6), 430–444 (1983)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Avgerou, C., Mcgrath, K.: Power, rationality, and the art of living through sociotechnical change. MIS Q. 31(2), 295–315 (2007)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Smith, K.K.: The movement of conflict in organizations: the joint dynamics of splitting and triangulation. Adm. Sci. Q. 34, 1–20 (1989)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Callon, M., Latour B.: Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro-Sociologies, Boston, pp. 227–303 (1981)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Callon, M.: Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication descoquilles SaintJacques et ses marins pêcheurs dans la baie de SaintBrieuc. L’année Sociologique 36, 168–208 (1986)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Callon, M.: Réseaux technicoéconomiques et irréversibilités. Figures de l’irréversibilité en économie 195–230 (1991)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour B.: A quoi tient le succès des innovations. Premier épisode: l’art de l’intéressement. Annales des Mines 14–29 (1988a)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Akrich, M., Callon, M., Latour, B.: A quoi tient le succès des innovations. Deuxième épisode: l’art de choisir les bons portes paroles. Annales des Mines 4–17 (1988b)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Susman, G.I., Evered, R.D.: An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Adm. Sci. Q. 23, 582–603 (1978)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Davison, R.M., Martinsons, M.G., Kock, N.: Principles of canonical action research. Inf. Syst. J. 14(1), 65–86 (2004)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Davison, R.: An instrument for measuring meeting success. Inf. Manage. 32(4), 163–176 (1997)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Baskerville, R.L.: Investigating information systems with action research. Commun. AIS 2(3), Article 19 (1999)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Dick, B.: A beginner’s guide to action research. http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/guide.html (1995)
  90. 90.
    Du Poy, E., Gitlin, L.N.: Introduction to Research: Understanding and Applying Multiple Strategies, 2nd edn. Mosby Inc., St Louis (1998)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., Schultze, U.: Design principles for competence management systems: a synthesis of an action research study. MIS Q. 28(3), 435–472 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Bou Saba
    • 1
  • Mario Saba
    • 2
    Email author
  • Antoine Harfouche
    • 3
  1. 1.EDHEC Business School—Efficient InnovationParisFrance
  2. 2.Cesar Ritz Colleges Switzerland—Washington State University Carson College of Business, Switzerland International CenterBrigSwitzerland
  3. 3.EDHEC Business SchoolLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations