Advertisement

Revitalisation Models for Central European Country Houses

  • Boris DundovićEmail author
  • Mladen Obad Šćitaroci
  • József Sisa
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

A country house is a representative building which, apart from its residential function, also serves as a managerial focus for the wider estate. Throughout history, the representation, organisation, and management of a country house have served as complementary economic mechanisms that ensured that the seigniorial estate functioned as a (self-)sustaining system. After the dissolution of the Austro-Hungarian Monarchy in 1918, life in Central European country houses started to decline progressively. The ensuing turbulent national, social, and political situations on the territory of the former empire left the majority of the country houses to oblivion and decay. However, after a long hiatus, interest in this type of built heritage in Central Europe has significantly increased in the last few decades. In the present-day economy, recognising and implementing suitable models of active use for the manors of the region has become a pressing issue. This chapter begins with a presentation of the historical models of alterations, and deliberates on the adequacy of their implementation today. It proposes contemporary architectural and conservation models of revitalisation and includes the urban and spatial planning models which can contribute to the rehabilitation of wider cultural landscapes in rural parts of Central Europe.

Keywords

Contemporary models Cultural landscape Economic sustainability Management Manor house 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research is part of the scientific project “Heritage Urbanism—Urban and Spatial Planning Models for Revival and Enhancement of Cultural Heritage”. It is financed by the Croatian Science Foundation [HRZZ-2032] and carried out at the University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture.

References

  1. Deleuze G (1994) Difference and repetition. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Dundović B, Obad Šćitaroci M, Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci B (2012) Prolegomenon to the comparison of stylistic features of Hungarian and Croatian manor houses in historicism. Prostor 20(2):352–367Google Scholar
  3. Dundović B, Obad Šćitaroci M, Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci B (2015) Revitalisation of country houses along the route “Tracing the steps of the counts Jankovich”: guidelines for nodes of functional intensities. In: Obad Šćitaroci M (ed) Cultural heritage—possibilities for spatial and economic development: proceedings. University of Zagreb, Faculty of Architecture, Zagreb, pp 114–119Google Scholar
  4. Fekete CsJ (2002) Kastélyideál a századfordulón. Architectura Hungariae 4(1):13. http://arch.et.bme.hu/arch_old/korabbi_folyam/13/13fekete.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
  5. Fekete CsJ (2016) A magyarországi kastélyprogramok bemutatása kitekintéssel az állami kastélyfenntartás külföldi gyakorlatára. http://www.terc.hu/documents/Kast%C3%A9lyprogram%20cikk.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2018
  6. Hale M (2017) Radicalising architecture by redefining the monument. In: Boundas CV, Tentokali V (eds) Architectural and urban reflections after Deleuze and Guattari. Rowman & Littlefield International, London, pp 221–241Google Scholar
  7. Lazányi O et al (2016) Multidisciplinary methodology development to measure socio-economic impacts generated by cultural heritage projects. In: Van Balen K, Vandesande A (eds) Heritage counts. Garant, Antwerp/Apeldoorn, pp 99–110Google Scholar
  8. Nemzeti Kastély- és Várprogram (2016) Info jegyzet: képviselői információs szolgálat 26, 19 May 2016. http://www.parlament.hu/documents/10181/595001/Infojegyzet_2016_26_kastelyprogram.pdf. Accessed 22 Mar 2018
  9. Obad Šćitaroci M, Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci B (2001) Manors and gardens in Croatia: Slavonia—from Zagreb to Vukovar. Šćitaroci, ZagrebGoogle Scholar
  10. Obad Šćitaroci M, Bojanić Obad Šćitaroci B (2006) Two millennia long tradition of manors, burgs, villas and summer houses on the territory of Croatia. In: Lioce R (ed) Villas, stately homes and castles: compatible use, valorisation and creative management—experiences, tools and methods. Edizioni Lunargento, Venice, pp 135–151Google Scholar
  11. Obad Šćitaroci M et al (2006) Criteria for valorisation of manors: addendum for selection of the most valuable Croatian manors. In: Lioce R (ed) Villas, stately homes and castles: compatible use, valorisation and creative management—experiences, tools and methods. Edizioni Lunargento, Venice, pp 175–189Google Scholar
  12. Petzet M (2004) Principles of preservation: an introduction to the international charters for conservation and restoration 40 years after the Venice Charter. International charters for conservation and restoration: monuments & sites, vol I. ICOMOS, München, pp 7–29Google Scholar
  13. Sisa J (2007) Kastélyépítészet és kastélykultúra Magyarországon: a historizmus kora. Vince Kiadó, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  14. Sisa J (2010) The Hungarian country house 1840–1914. Acta historiae artium 51:139–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Széchenyi I (1866) Pesti por és sár. Heckenast Gusztáv, PestGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Boris Dundović
    • 1
    Email author
  • Mladen Obad Šćitaroci
    • 2
  • József Sisa
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of History of Art, Building Archaeology and RestorationVienna University of TechnologyViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department for Urban and Spatial Planning and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of ArchitectureUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia
  3. 3.Research Centre for Humanities, Institute for Art HistoryHungarian Academy of SciencesBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations