Advertisement

The Consolidation of the Orbán Regime: Towards ‘Authoritarian-Ethnicist Neoliberalism’?

  • Adam Fabry
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyses the seemingly contradictory fusion between authoritarian state practices and neoliberal economic policies in Hungary under the Orbán regime. Since returning to power in 2010 on a popular backlash against austerity, the hard-right Fidesz-Kereszténydemokrata Néppárt (Fidesz-KDNP) government, led by the charismatic and dexterous Viktor Orbán, has carried out a root-and-branch transformation of Hungarian society. While officially proposing a break with neoliberalism at home and abroad, the chapter argues that the Orbán regime has rather deepened it, producing a specific variety of neoliberalism, which skilfully combines some of the central tenets of neoliberalism (maintenance of a balanced budget, introduction of a flat tax system, and the pursuit of regressive social policies) with ‘authoritarian-ethnicist’ measures that seek to co-opt, coerce, or manufacture consensus among subaltern groups in society against alleged ‘enemies’ of the Hungarian nation. While Orbán’s ‘illiberal’ politics have been strongly criticised by international and regional institutions, such as the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the European Union (EU), they have taken little concrete action against the Hungarian government. The reason for this is pragmatic: the Orbán regime has not only been a model for neoliberal austerity in Europe since the 2008 crisis, but also its authoritarian-ethnicist policies are not that different from those practised by other EU states.

Keywords

Authoritarianism Ethnicism Fidesz Hungary Neoliberalism Viktor Orbán 

References

  1. ‘800 millióért tudtuk meg, hogy Magyarország jobban teljesít’. (2014, January 2). Origo.hu. Retrieved January 18, 2014, from http://www.origo.hu/itthon/20140102-800-milliobol-tudtuk-meg-hogy-magyarorszag-jobban-teljesit.html.
  2. A Nemzeti Együttműködés Programja. (2010, May 22). Government of Hungary. Retrieved from http://www.parlament.hu/irom39/00047/00047.pdf.
  3. Ádám, V. (2014, August 18). Drámai adatok Magyarországról – így terjed a szegénység. Napi.hu. Retrieved August 23, 2014, from http://www.napi.hu/magyar_gazdasag/dramai_adatok_magyarorszagrol_igy_terjed_a_szegenyseg.585336.html.
  4. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (2016). Dialectic of Enlightenment. London and New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Ali, T. (2015). The Extreme Centre: A Warning. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  6. Balogh, E. S. (2015, May 29). The Last Five Years of the Orbán Government, Fact and Fiction. Hungarian Spectrum. Retrieved August 29, 2016, from http://hungarianspectrum.org/2015/05/29/the-last-five-years-of-the-orban-government-fact-and-fiction.
  7. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1541–1563.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607096386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Batory, A. (2016). Populists in Government? Hungary’s “System of National Cooperation”. Democratization, 23(2), 283–303.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2015.1076214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Békesi, L. (2012, February 17). Látlelet a magyar gazdaságról 2012 februárjában. Élet és Irodalom, 56(7).Google Scholar
  10. Berend, N., & Clark, C. (2014, November 20). Not Just a Phase. London Review of Books, 36, 19–21.Google Scholar
  11. Bonefeld, W. (2017). The Strong State and the Free Economy. London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  12. Book, S. (2018, February 9). German Mittelstand Reaps Dividend of Eastern European Autocracy. Handelsblatt. Retrieved from https://global.handelsblatt.com/companies/for-german-business-eastern-europe-autocracy-pays-dividends-881082.
  13. Bozóki, A. (2015a). Broken Democracy, Predatory State, and Nationalist Populism. In P. Krasztev & J. V. Til (Eds.), The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to an Illiberal Democracy (pp. 3–36). Budapest and New York, NY: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bozóki, A. (2015b). The Politics of Worst Practices: Hungary in the 2010s. Centres de Recherches Internacionales, Sciences Po, February 2015. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www.sciencespo.fr/ceri/fr/content/dossiersduceri/politics-worst-practices-hungary-2010s.
  15. Bruff, I. (2014). The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08935696.2013.843250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bruff, I. (2016). Neoliberalism and Authoritarianism. In S. Springer, K. Birch, & J. MacLeavy (Eds.), The Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 107–117). New York, NY and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Bryant, C. (2010, April 25). Hungary’s Centre-Right in Landslide Victory. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  18. Buckley, N., & Byrne, A. (2017, December 21). Viktor Orban’s Oligarchs: A New Elite Emerges in Hungary. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  19. Buckley, N., & Foy, H. (2016, September 7). Orban and Kaczynski Vow “Cultural Counter-Revolution” to Reform EU. Financial Times.Google Scholar
  20. ‘Budging Budapest’. (2012, March 15). Financial Times.Google Scholar
  21. Council of Europe (Venice Commission). (2013). Draft Opinion on the Fourth Amendment to the Fundamental Law of Hungary (No. CDL-AD (2013)012-e). Venice: Council of Europe.Google Scholar
  22. Dale, G. (Ed.). (2011). First the Transition, Then the Crash: Eastern Europe in the 2000s. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  23. Dale, G., & Fabry, A. (2018). Neoliberalism in Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union. In D. Cahill, M. Konings, M. Cooper, & D. Primrose (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Neoliberalism (pp. 234–247). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2013). The New Way of the World: On Neoliberal Society. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  25. Davidson, N. (2017). Crisis Neoliberalism and Regimes of Permanent Exception. Critical Sociology, 43(4–5), 615–634.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516655386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davidson, N., & Saull, R. (2017). Neoliberalism and the Far-Right: A Contradictory Embrace. Critical Sociology, 43(4–5), 707–724.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516671180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Smet, B., & Bogaert, K. (2017). Resistance and Passive Revolution in Egypt and Morocco. In C. B. Tansel (Ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (pp. 211–234). London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  28. Debreczeni, J. (2002). Orbán Viktor. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
  29. Djankov, S. (2015). Hungary Under Orbán: Can Central Planning Revive Its Economy? (Policy Brief No. PB15-11). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.Google Scholar
  30. Duménil, G., & Lévy, D. (2010). The Crisis of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Enyedi, Z., & Benoit, K. (2011). Kritikus választás 2010. A magyar pártrendszer átrendeződése a bal-jobb dimenzióban. In Z. Enyedi, A. Szabó, & R. Tardos (Eds.), Új képlet. Választás Magyarországon 2010 (pp. 17–42). Budapest: Demokrácia Kutatások Magyar Központja Alapitvány.Google Scholar
  32. European Commission. (2018). Country Report Hungary 2018. European Semester: Assessment of Progress on Structural Reforms, Prevention and Correction of Macroeconomic Imbalances, and Results of In-depth Reviews under Regulation (EU) No. 1176/2011 (Commission Staff Working Document No. SWD(2018) 215). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  33. Fabry, A. (2015). The Far Right in Hungary. In F. Leplat (Ed.), The Far Right in Europe (pp. 202–247). London: Resistance Books.Google Scholar
  34. Fekete, L. (2016). Hungary: Power, Punishment and the “Christian-National Idea”. Race & Class, 57(4), 39–53.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396815624607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fleck, Z., Gadó, G., Halmai, G., Hegyi, S., Juhász, G., Kis, J., & Tóth, G. A. (2011). Vélemény Magyarország Alaptörvényéröl. Fundamentum, 15(1), 61–77.Google Scholar
  36. Fletcher, M. (2017, August 1). Is Hungary the EU’s First Rogue State? Viktor Orban and the Long March from Freedom. New Statesman.Google Scholar
  37. Freedom House. (2015). Hungary: Country Report. In Freedom of the Press 2015. Washington, DC: Freedom House. Retrieved from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-press/2015/hungaryGoogle Scholar
  38. Gallas, A. (2015). The Thatcherite Offensive: A Neo-Poulantzasian Analysis. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gamble, A. (1988). The Free Economy and the Strong State: The Politics of Thatcherism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gorondi, P. (2011, April 18). Hungary Passes New Conservative Constitution. The Boston Globe.Google Scholar
  41. Gramsci, A. (1973). Selections from the Prison Notebooks (Q. Hoare & G. Nowell-Smith, Trans.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  42. Granter, E. (2017). Strictly Business: Critical Theory and the Society of Rackets. Competition & Change, 21(2), 94–113.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1024529417690716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hall, S. (1979). The Great Moving Right Show. Marxism Today, 23(1), 14–20.Google Scholar
  44. Hall, S. (1980). Popular Democratic vs. Authoritarian Populism: Two Ways of Taking Democracy Seriously. In A. Hunt (Ed.), Marxism and Democracy. London: Lawrence & Wishart.Google Scholar
  45. Hall, S. (1985). Authoritarian Populism: A Reply to Jessop et al. New Left Review, 1(147), 115–124.Google Scholar
  46. Hall, S. (1986). Gramsci’s Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity. Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 5–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/019685998601000202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hanieh, A. (2013). Lineages of Revolt: Issues of Contemporary Capitalism in the Middle East. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.Google Scholar
  48. von Hayek, F. A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. London: Ark Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  49. ‘Hungarian Residency Bond Program’. (n.d.). Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://www.residency-bond.eu/residency-bond-program.html.
  50. ‘Hungary Blunders’. (2010, July 20). Financial Times.Google Scholar
  51. ‘Hungary: Energy Prices Cut Again’. (2014, January 25). Euronews. Retrieved August 19, 2016, from http://www.euronews.com/2014/01/25/hungary-energy-prices-cut-again.
  52. ‘In Orbán’s Opinion Miklós Horthy was an Exceptional Statesman’. (2017, June 21). Hungarian Spectrum. Retrieved June 26, 2017, from http://hungarianspectrum.org/2017/06/21/in-orbans-opinion-miklos-horthy-was-an-exceptional-statesman.
  53. Johnson, J., & Barnes, A. (2015). Financial Nationalism and Its International Enablers: The Hungarian Experience. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 535–569.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.919336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Kiely, R. (2017). From Authoritarian Liberalism to Economic Technocracy: Neoliberalism, Politics and “De-democratization”. Critical Sociology, 43(4–5), 725–745.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920516668386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kirchick, J. (2012, March 16). Hungary’s Pit Bull Prime Minister. Foreign Policy. Retrieved September 4, 2017, from http://foreignpolicy.com/2012/03/16/hungarys-pit-bull-prime-minister.
  56. Kiss, A. (2015, February 20). Hungary: Working Poor, Minimum Wage and Minimum Income. Eurofound. Retrieved August 10, 2016, from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/working-conditions-industrial-relations/hungary-working-poor-minimum-wage-and-minimum-income.
  57. Klein, N. (2007). The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
  58. Klein, N. (2008, October 6). Wall St. Crisis Should Be for Neoliberalism What Fall of Berlin Wall Was for Communism. Democracy Now!. Retrieved April 4, 2017, from https://www.democracynow.org/2008/10/6/naomi_klein.
  59. Koltai, Mihaly. (2014, December 24). And So It Begins? First Cracks in the Orbán-Régime. LeftEast. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/and-so-it-begins-first-cracks-in-the-orban-regime.
  60. Koltai, Mihaly. (2017, July 5). Hungary: The End of Democratic Illusions? Jacobin. Retrieved September 7, 2017, from http://jacobinmag.com/2017/05/hungary-central-european-university-george-soros-protests.
  61. Koltai, Mihály. (2018, April 2). The Economics of “Orbánism”. LeftEast. Retrieved June 4, 2018, from http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/the-economics-of-orbanism.
  62. Komiljovics, M. (2012, July 17). Hungary: Almost 7,000 Public Sector Jobs Cut. Eurofound. Retrieved August 18, 2016, from http://www.eurofound.europa.eu/observatories/eurwork/articles/almost-7000-public-sector-jobs-cut.
  63. Korkut, U. (2012). Liberalization Challenges in Hungary: Elitism, Progressivism, and Populism. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Kornai, J. (2015). Hungary’s U-Turn: Retreating from Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 26(3), 34–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. KPMG. (2014). EU Funds in Central and Eastern Europe: Progress Report, 2007–2013. Budapest: KPMG Central and Eastern Europe.Google Scholar
  66. Krausz, T., Mitrovits, M., & Szarka, K. (2013). Neohorthyzmus és a kapitalizmus “második kiadása”. Eszmélet, 1(99), 5–16.Google Scholar
  67. Krémer, B. (2014, June 17). Mennyire lett kifosztva a társadalom? Beszélő. Retrieved August 19, 2016, from http://beszelo.c3.hu/onlinecikk/mennyire-lett-kifosztva-a-tarsadalom.
  68. Lendvai, P. (2018). Orbán: Europe’s New Strongman. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Leplat, F. (Ed.). (2015). The Far Right in Europe. London: Resistance Books.Google Scholar
  70. Lyman, R. (2015, October 16). Hungary Seals Border with Croatia in Migrant Crackdown. The New York Times.Google Scholar
  71. Magyar, B. (2016). Post-communist Maffia State: The Case of Hungary. Budapest: CEU Press; Noran Libro.Google Scholar
  72. Magyar, B., & Vásárhelyi, J. (Eds.). (2017). Twenty-Five Sides of a Post-communist Mafia State. Budapest: CEU Press; Noran Libro.Google Scholar
  73. Makovicky, N. (2013). “Work Pays”: Slovak Neoliberalism as “Authoritarian Populism”. Focaal-Journal of Global and Historical Anthropology, 67, 77–90.  https://doi.org/10.3167/fcl.2013.670106Google Scholar
  74. Manunza, L. (2017). From Mare Nostrum to Triton: Humanitarian Emergencies and Neoliberal Migration Management in the Mediterranean. In C. B. Tansel (Ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (pp. 129–148). London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  75. Mayes, D. G., & Michalski, A. (2013). The Changing Welfare State in Europe: The Implications for Democracy. Cheltenham and Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. ‘Mercedes Building New Car Plant in Hungary, to Employ 2,500’. (2016, July 29). The Washington Post.Google Scholar
  77. Merrill, H. (2011). Migration and Surplus Populations: Race and Deindustrialization in Northern Italy. Antipode, 43(5), 1542–1572.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00904.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. ‘Migrant Crisis: UN Criticises Hungary over Border Controls’. (2016, July 9). BBC News. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-36753648.
  79. Mommen, A. (2004). Magyarország neoliberális forradalma, a kapitalista globalizáció sikertörténete? Eszmélet, 1(63), 159–176.Google Scholar
  80. MTI. (2011, March 21). Fidesz Parliamentary Leader Apologises for “Poverty Remarks”. Politics.hu. Retrieved December 11, 2014, from http://www.politics.hu/20110321/fidesz-parliamentary-leader-apologises-for-poverty-remarks.
  81. MTI Econews. (2016, March 30). EU Suspends €121 mln in Development Funds Meant for Hungary. Budapest Business Journal. Retrieved August 24, 2016, from http://bbj.hu/economy/report-eu-suspends-121-mln-in-development-funds-meant-for-hungary_113694.
  82. Myant, M., Drahokoupil, J., & Lesay, I. (2013). The Political Economy of Crisis Management in East-Central European Countries. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(3), 383–410.  https://doi.org/10.2307/23438628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Naczyk, M. (2014). Budapest in Warsaw: Central European Business Elites and the Rise of Economic Patriotism Since the Crisis. Paper presented at the Society for the Advancement of Socio-Economics (SASE) 26th Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  84. Oltay, E. (2012). Fidesz and the Reinvention of the Hungarian Center-Right. Budapest: Századvég Kiadó.Google Scholar
  85. ‘Orbán: a következő 15–20 évben egy nagy kormányzó párt lehet’. (2010, February 16). Heti Világgazdaság. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://hvg.hu/itthon/20100216_orban_viktor_egy_nagy_kormanyzo_part.
  86. ‘Orbán Calls “Ethnic Homogeneity” a Key to Success’. (2017, March 1). Euractiv.com. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from https://www.euractiv.com/section/justice-home-affairs/news/orban-calls-ethnic-homogeneity-a-key-to-success.
  87. ‘Orbán Snubbed by Romanian PM as Nyirő Affair Escalates’. (2012, June 4). Politics.hu. Retrieved August 23, 2016, from http://www.politics.hu/20120604/orban-snubbed-by-romanian-pm-as-nyiro-affair-escalates.
  88. Orbán, V. (2014). A munkaalapú állam korszaka következik. Speech at the 25th Summer University and Youth Camp, Tusnádfürdő (Băile Tuşnad), Romania, July 26, 2014. Retrieved June 4, 2018, from http://www.kormany.hu/hu/a-miniszterelnok/hirek/a-munkaalapu-allam-korszaka-kovetkezik.
  89. Otarashvili, M. (2014, July 30). Hunger for Power in Hungary? The Alarming Nature of Viktor Orban’s New “Manifesto”. Foreign Policy Research Institute. Retrieved September 4, 2017, from https://www.fpri.org/2014/07/hunger-for-power-in-hungary-the-alarming-nature-of-viktor-orbans-new-manifesto.
  90. Özden, B. A., Akça, I., & Bekmen, A. (2017). Antinomies of Authoritarian Neoliberalism in Turkey: The Justice and Development Party Era. In C. B. Tansel (Ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (pp. 189–210). London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  91. Panitch, L., & Albo, G. (Eds.). (2015). The Politics of the Right: Socialist Register 2016. London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  92. Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing Space. Antipode, 34(3), 380–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Petőcz, G. (2015). Milla: A Suspended Experiment. In P. Krasztev & J. Van Til (Eds.), The Hungarian Patient: Social Opposition to a an Illiberal Democracy (pp. 207–230). Budapest and New York, NY: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
  94. ‘Planet Orban’. (2011, November 26). The Economist.Google Scholar
  95. Pogátsa, Z. (2016). Magyarország politikai gazdaságtana és az északi modell esélyei. Budapest: Osiris.Google Scholar
  96. Pollock, F. (1941). State Capitalism: Its Possibilities and Limitations. Studies in Philosophy and Social Science, 9(2), 220–225.  https://doi.org/10.5840/zfs19419224Google Scholar
  97. Posaner, J., & Ariès, Q. (2016, December 14). Shrugging off Concerns, Europe Waves Through Hungary’s Controversial Nuke Deal. Politico.hu. Retrieved September 5, 2017, from http://www.politico.eu/article/europes-radioactive-embrace-hungary-russia-paks-ii-project-nuclear-reactors.
  98. Poulantzas, N. (1978). State, Power, Socialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  99. Poulantzas, N. (2008). The Poulantzas Reader: Marxism, Law, and the State (J. Martin, Ed.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  100. Robbins, L. (1934). The Great Depression, 1929–1934. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  101. Rowlands, C. (2013). “Gypsies are Animals”—Racism on Hungary’s Right. New Left Project, 1 February 2013. Retrieved December 11, 2013, from http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/gypsies_are_animals_racism_on_hungarys_right.
  102. Rueff, J. (1934). La crise du capitalisme. Paris: Édition de la Revue blanche.Google Scholar
  103. Rutland, P. (2013). Neoliberalism and the Russian Transition. Review of International Political Economy, 20(2), 332–362.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2012.727844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Sárközy, T. (2014). Kétharmados túlzáskormányzás. Avagy gólerős csatár a mély talajú pályán. Budapest: Park Könyvkiadó.Google Scholar
  105. Saull, R., Anievas, A., Davidson, N., & Fabry, A. (Eds.). (2014). The Longue Durée of the Far-Right: An International Historical Sociology. Abingdon and New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  106. Scheppele, K. L. (2012, April 19). The New Hungarian Secret Police. Paul Krugman New York Times Blog. Retrieved August 16, 2016, from http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/04/19/the-new-hungarian-secret-police.
  107. Schulte-Bockholt, A. (2006). The Politics of Organized Crime and the Organized Crime of Politics: A Study in Criminal Power. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  108. Shields, S. (2006). Historicizing Transition: The Polish Political Economy in a Period of Global Structural Change—Eastern Central Europe’s Passive Revolution? International Politics, 43(4), 474–499.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ip.8800166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Simon, R. (2010). Passive Revolution, Perestroika, and the Emergence of the New Russia. Capital & Class, 34(3), 429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0309816810378154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Sotiris, P. (2017). The Authoritarian and Disciplinary Mechanism of Reduced Sovereignty in the EU: The Case of Greece. In C. B. Tansel (Ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (pp. 171–188). London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  111. Springer, S. (2017). Klepto-Neoliberalism: Authoritarianism and Patronage in Cambodia. In C. B. Tansel (Ed.), States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order (pp. 235–254). London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  112. Stiglitz, J. E. (2008, July 7). The End of Neo-liberalism? Project Syndicate. Retrieved April 16, 2018, from http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-end-of-neo-liberalism.
  113. Szabó, I. (2013). Between Polarization and Statism: The Effects of the Crisis on Collective Bargaining Processes and Outcomes in Hungary. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 19(2), 205–215.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258913480702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. Szelényi, I. (2015). Capitalisms After Communism. New Left Review, 2(96), 39–51.Google Scholar
  115. Szelényi, I., & Csillag, T. (2015). Drifting from Liberal Democracy: Traditionalist/Neo-conservative Ideology of Managed Illiberal Democratic Capitalism in Post-communist Europe. Intersections, 1(1), 18–48.  https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v1i1.28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and Welfare in Hard Times: The Social Policy of the Orban Government in Hungary Between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486–500.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Szurovecz, I. (2017, September 26). Nőtt az oktatásra szánt pénz, már majdnem ott tartunk, ahol 15 éve. Abcug.hu. Retrieved June 5, 2018, from https://abcug.hu/nott-az-oktatasra-szant-penz-mar-majdnem-ott-tartunk-ahol-15-eve.
  118. Tamás, G. M. (2012, June 7). Az utolsó tengelyhatalom. Magyar Narancs.Google Scholar
  119. Tamás, G. M. (2013). Words from Budapest: An Interview with G.M. Tamás. New Left Review, 2(80), 5–26.Google Scholar
  120. Tamás, G. M. (2014, May 5). Hungary: A Black Hole on Europe’s Map. LeftEast. Retrieved March 12, 2015, from http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/hungary-a-black-hole-on-europes-map.
  121. Tamás, G. M. (2015). Ethnicism after Nationalism: The Roots of the New European Right. In L. Panitch & G. Albo (Eds.), The Politics of the Right: Socialist Register, 2016 (Vol. 52, pp. 118–135). London: Merlin Press.Google Scholar
  122. Tansel, C. B. (Ed.). (2017). States of Discipline: Authoritarian Neoliberalism and the Contested Reproduction of Capitalist Order. London and New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  123. Tavares, R. (2013). Report on the Situation of Fundamental Rights, Standards and Practices in Hungary (No. 2012/2130 (INI)). Brussels: European Parliament: Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs.Google Scholar
  124. Taylor, M. (2002). Success for Whom? An Historical-Materialist Critique of Neoliberalism in Chile. Historical Materialism, 10(2), 45–75.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156920602320318084CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Than, K. (2010, July 22). Analysis: Hungary Risks Markets’ Goodwill with IMF/EU Failure. Reuters.com. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.reuters.com/article/us-hungary-imf-analysis-idUSTRE66H0UE20100722.
  126. Thomas, P. D. (2009). The Gramscian Moment: Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. Leiden and Boston, MA: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Topolay, G. (2016, May 21). Magyarország jó terep a beruházásra – interjú az Amerikai-Magyar Üzleti Tanács elnökével. Magyar Hírlap.Google Scholar
  128. Tóth, C. (2014, December 3). Senator John McCain Calls Viktor Orbán a “Neo-Fascist Dictator”. The Budapest Beacon. Retrieved from https://budapestbeacon.com/senator-john-mccain-calls-viktor-orban-neo-fascist-dictator.
  129. Tóth, C. G., & Virovácz, P. (2013). Nyertesek és vesztesek. A magyar egykulcsos adóreform vizsgálata. Pénzügyi Szemle, 58(4), 385–400.Google Scholar
  130. Udvarhelyi, É. T. (2014, November 21). Criminalising the Homeless—A State Strategy in Hungary. New Left Project. Retrieved August 3, 2016, from http://www.newleftproject.org/index.php/site/article_comments/criminalising_the_homeless_a_state_strategy_in_hungary.
  131. Ultsch, C. (2018, January 30). Strache preist Orbán als “großen Europäer”. Die Presse.Google Scholar
  132. Varró, S. (2009, February 5). A Jobbik mint harmadik erő – 1 rész: Egy sörözőben összejöttek. Magyar Narancs.Google Scholar
  133. Verseck, K. (2012, June 6). “Creeping Cult”: Hungary Rehabilitates Far-Right Figures. Der Spiegel. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/right-wing-extremists-cultivate-horthy-cult-in-hungary-a-836526.html.
  134. Verseck, K. (2014, April 2). Wahlkampf in Ungarn: Orbáns Clan plündert die Staatskassen. Der Spiegel. Retrieved from http://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausland/ungarn-ministerpraeside.
  135. Viktor Orbán and Recep Tayip Erdogan are the Best of Friends. (2013, December 18). Hungarian Spectrum. Retrieved June 5, 2018, from http://hungarianspectrum.org/2013/12/18/viktor-orban-and-recep-tayyip-erdogan-are-the-best-of-friends.
  136. Walker, S. (2018, May 29). Hungary to Criminalise Migrant Helpers with “Stop Soros” Legislation. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  137. Weisbrot, M. (2010, August 9). To Viktor Go the Spoils: How Hungary Blazes a Trail in Europe. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  138. Werkhäuser, N. (2015, September 23). Hungary’s Orban Criticizes Merkel’s “Moral Imperialism”. Deutsche Welle. Retrieved August 24, 2016, from http://www.dw.com/en/hungarys-orban-criticizes-merkels-moral-imperialism/a-18736240.
  139. Wiener, G. (2014, November–December). Orbán Viktor passziv forradalma – 2 rész. Ezredvég, XXIV(6).Google Scholar
  140. Wilkin, P. (2016). Hungary’s Crisis of Democracy: The Road to Serfdom. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  141. Wilson, E. (2009). Government of the Shadows: Parapolitics and Criminal Sovereignty. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
  142. Zhong, R. (2012, March 22). The Descent of Hungary. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adam Fabry
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Study on Culture and Society National Scientific and Technical Research CouncilNational University of CórdobaCórdobaArgentina

Personalised recommendations