Advertisement

Impact of Antibiotics on Biogas Production

  • Ricardo Luís Radis SteinmetzEmail author
  • Vanessa Gressler
Chapter
Part of the Biofuel and Biorefinery Technologies book series (BBT, volume 9)

Abstract

Besides their use in human treatments, antibiotics have been extensively used to control animal diseases and, in some countries, still used to promote animal growth in livestock industry. To attempt human diet necessities, concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) are necessary, increasing antibiotics consumption and manure production. Once antibiotic active agents and its metabolites are excreted in urine and feces, these substances are present in manure and can reach the environment. Around the world, especially in rural areas, manure is the main substrate for biogas production. This chapter presents a review about fate of antibiotics, with special focus on livestock by-products, and effects during the anaerobic digestion (AD). The antibiotic interaction has two important emphases addressed: (a) inhibition on the biogas and methane production process by the presence and action of these compounds and metabolites in the digester and (b) the ability of AD to degrade the molecules of antibiotics and thereby reduce the adverse effect caused by these compounds on the environment.

Keywords

Anaerobic digestion Veterinary drugs Inhibition 

References

  1. Aga DS, Goldfish R, Kulshrestha P (2003) Application of ELISA in determining the fate of tetracyclines in land-applied livestock wastes. Analyst 128:658.  https://doi.org/10.1039/b301630gCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexy R, Schöll A, Kümpel T, Kümmerer K (2004) What do we know about antibiotics in the environment? Pharmaceuticals in the environment. Springer, Berlin, pp 209–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelidaki I, Alves M, Bolzonella D et al (2009) Defining the biomethane potential (BMP) of solid organic wastes and energy crops: a proposed protocol for batch assays. Water Sci Technol 59:927.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2009.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bbosa GS, Mwebaza N (2013) Global irrational antibiotics/antibacterial drugs use: a current and future health and environmental consequences. In: Méndez-Vilas A (ed) Microbial pathogens and strategies for combating them: science, technology and education, Formatex Research Center, pp 1645–1655Google Scholar
  5. Bressan CR, Airton K, Schmidell W, Soares HM (2013) Effects of long-term exposure to antimicrobial colistin sulfate (polymyxin E) over mixed cultures of nitrifiers and methanogens. In: RAMIRAN, p 4Google Scholar
  6. Brown KD, Kulis J, Thomson B et al (2006) Occurrence of antibiotics in hospital, residential, and dairy effluent, municipal wastewater, and the Rio Grande in New Mexico. Sci Total Environ 366:772–783.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.10.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. CDDEP (2015) The state of the world’s antibioticsGoogle Scholar
  8. Cetecioglu Z, Ince B, Orhon D, Ince O (2012) Acute inhibitory impact of antimicrobials on acetoclastic methanogenic activity. Bioresour Technol 114:109–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.03.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Zhang H, Luo Y, Song J (2012a) Occurrence and dissipation of veterinary antibiotics in two typical swine wastewater treatment systems in East China. Environ Monit Assess 184:2205–2217.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2110-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Zhang H, Luo Y, Song J (2012b) Occurrence and assessment of veterinary antibiotics in swine manures: a case study in East China. Chin Sci Bull 57:606–614.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-011-4830-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chenxi W, Spongberg AL, Witter JD (2008) Determination of the persistence of pharmaceuticals in biosolids using liquid-chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 73:511–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Briyne N, Atkinson J, Borriello SP, Pokludová L (2014) Antibiotics used most commonly to treat animals in Europe. Vet Rec 175:325.  https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.102462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. ESVAC (2017) Sales of veterinary antimicrobial agents in 30 European countries in 2015 trends from 2010 to 2015. In: Seventh ESVAC reportGoogle Scholar
  14. Etebu E, Arikekpar I (2016) Antibiotics: classification and mechanisms of action with emphasis on molecular perspectives. Ijambr 4:90–101Google Scholar
  15. FDA (2017) Antimicrobials sold or distributed for use in food-producing animalsGoogle Scholar
  16. Federation of Veterinarians of Europe—FVE (2016) Antimicrobial use in food-producing animals—replies to EFSA/EMA questions on the use of antimicrobials in food-producing animals in EU and possible measures to reduce antimicrobial useGoogle Scholar
  17. Fischer JR, Iannotti EL, Sievers DM (1981) Anaerobic digestion of manure from swine fed on various diets. Agric Wastes 3:201–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gartiser S, Urich E, Alexy R, Kümmerer K (2007) Anaerobic inhibition and biodegradation of antibiotics in ISO test schemes. Chemosphere 66:1839–1848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.08.040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez Ronquillo M, Angeles Hernandez JC (2017) Antibiotic and synthetic growth promoters in animal diets: review of impact and analytical methods. Food Control 72:255–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Haller MY, Müller SR, McArdell CS et al (2002) Quantification of veterinary antibiotics (sulfonamides and trimethoprim) in animal manure by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 952:111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(02)00083-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hao H, Cheng G, Iqbal Z, et al (2014) Benefits and risks of antimicrobial use in food-producing animals. Front Microbiol 5.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00288
  22. He Z, Pagliari PH, Waldrip HM (2016) Applied and environmental chemistry of animal manure: a review. Pedosphere 26:779–816.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60087-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu XG, Luo Y, Zhou QX, Xu L (2008) Determination of thirteen antibiotics residues in manure by solid phase extraction and high performance liquid chromatography. Chin J Anal Chem 36:1162–1166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2040(08)60063-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. International Organization for Standardization (2003) ISO 13641-1 water quality—determination of inhibition of gas production of anaerobic bacteria. General test. 16Google Scholar
  25. Jacobsen AM, Halling-Sørensen B (2006) Multi-component analysis of tetracyclines, sulfonamides and tylosin in swine manure by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 384:1164–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-005-0261-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jarvis A, Leather J, Shembavnekar N, Linh T (2011) Assessment of the impact of the revision of veterinary pharmaceutical legislation. London, UKGoogle Scholar
  27. Ji JY, Xing YJ, Ma ZT et al (2013) Acute toxicity of pharmaceutical wastewaters containing antibiotics to anaerobic digestion treatment. Chemosphere 91:1094–1098.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koch BJ, Hungate BA, Price LB (2017) Food-animal production and the spread of antibiotic resistance: the role of ecology. Front Ecol Environ 15:309–318.  https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kunz A, Miele M, Steinmetz RLR (2009) Advanced swine manure treatment and utilization in Brazil. Bioresour Technol 100:5485–5489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lambert T (2012) Antibiotics that affect the ribosome. Rev Sci Tech 31:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Landers TF, Cohen B, Wittum TE, Larson EL (2012) A review of antibiotic use in food animals: perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep 127:4–22.  https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491212700103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leal RMP, Figueira RF, Tornisielo VL, Regitano JB (2012) Occurrence and sorption of fluoroquinolones in poultry litters and soils from São Paulo State, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 432:344–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li Y, Liu H, Li G et al (2018) Manure digestate storage under different conditions: chemical characteristics and contaminant residuals. Sci Total Environ 639:19–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Loftin KA, Henny C, Adams CD et al (2005) Inhibition of microbial metabolism in anaerobic lagoons by selected sulfonamides, tetracyclines, lincomycin, and tylosin tartrate. Environ Toxicol Chem 24:782–788.  https://doi.org/10.1897/04-093R.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Martínez-Carballo E, González-Barreiro C, Scharf S, Gans O (2007) Environmental monitoring study of selected veterinary antibiotics in animal manure and soils in Austria. Environ Pollut 148:570–579.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2006.11.035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Massé DI, Lu D, Masse L, Droste RL (2000) Effect of antibiotics on psychrophilic anaerobic digestion of swine manure slurry in sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour Technol 75:205–211.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00046-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. O’Neill J (2015) The review on antimicrobial resistance. LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Pan X, Qiang Z, Ben W, Chen M (2011) Residual veterinary antibiotics in swine manure from concentrated animal feeding operations in Shandong Province, China. Chemosphere 84:695–700.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.03.022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poels J, Van Assche P, Verstraete W (1984) Effects of disinfectants and antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. Agric Wastes 9:239–247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-4607(84)90083-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sanz JL, Rodríguez N, Amils R (1996) The action of antibiotics on the anaerobic digestion process. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 46:587–592.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002530050865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Scheeren MB, Kunz A, Steinmetz RLR, Dressler VL (2011) The ANAMMOX process as an alternative for treatment of water with high containing nitrogen. Rev Bras Eng Agric e Ambient 15Google Scholar
  42. Schlüsener MP, Bester K, Spiteller M (2003) Determination of antibiotics such as macrolides, ionophores and tiamulin in liquid manure by HPLC-MS/MS. Anal Bioanal Chem 375:942–947.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-003-1838-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlüsener MP, Von Arb MA, Bester K (2006) Elimination of macrolides, tiamulin, and salinomycin during manure storage. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-0240-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seganfredo MA, Girotto AF (2004) Custos de armazenamento e transporte de dejetos suínos usados como fertilizante do solo. Concórdia/BrazilGoogle Scholar
  45. Shi JC, Liao XD, Wu YB, Liang JB (2011) Effect of antibiotics on methane arising from anaerobic digestion of pig manure. Anim Feed Sci Technol 166–167:457–463.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Shimada T, Zilles JL, Morgenroth E, Raskin L (2008) Inhibitory effects of the macrolide antimicrobial tylosin on anaerobic treatment. Biotechnol Bioeng 101:73–82.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.21864CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shimada T, Li X, Zilles JL et al (2011) Effects of the antimicrobial tylosin on the microbial community structure of an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Biotechnol Bioeng 108:296–305.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Silva M, Lidon FC (2016) Food preservatives—an overview on applications and side effects. Emirates J Food Agric 28:366–373.  https://doi.org/10.9755/ejfa.2016-04-351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sneeringer S, MacDonald J, Key N et al (2015) Economics of antibiotic use in U.S. Livestock productionGoogle Scholar
  50. Sperelakis N (2012) Cell physiology sourcebook: essentials of membrane biophysics, 4th edn. ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinmetz RLR, Gressler V, Kunz A, Soares HM (2016) Tetracycline compounds interference and persistence in co-digestion of animal manure and cellulosic wastes. In: XIII Latin American workshop and symposium on anaerobic digestion. IWA—International Water Association, Cusco/Peru, p 4Google Scholar
  52. Tagiri-Endo M, Suzuki S, Nakamura T et al (2009) Rapid determination of five antibiotic residues in swine wastewater by online solid-phase extraction–high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 393:1367–1375.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-008-2543-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tilman D, Cassman KG, Matson PA et al (2002) Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature 418:671–677.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tong Z-L, Liu Y-L, Hu Z-H, Yuan S-J (2012) Anaerobic digestion of animal manure contaminated by tetracyclines. Huan Jing Ke Xue 33:1028–1032Google Scholar
  55. Turker G, Ince O, Ertekin E et al (2013) Changes in performance and active microbial communities due to single and multiple effects of mixing and solid content in anaerobic digestion process of OTC medicated cattle manure. Int J Renew Energ Res 3:144–148Google Scholar
  56. Van Boeckel TP, Brower C, Gilbert M et al (2015) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. In: Proceedings of national academy sciences, USA, pp 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503141112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Venglovsky J, Sasakova N, Placha I (2009) Pathogens and antibiotic residues in animal manures and hygienic and ecological risks related to subsequent land application. Bioresour Technol 100:5386–5391.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Health Organization W (2018) Antibiotic resistance. http://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance. Accessed on 8 Oct 2018
  59. Yan DY, Lam FL (2015) Development of a novel photocatalyst for the advanced antibiotic oxidation of wastewater. Springerplus 4:O7.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-4-S2-O7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhao L, Dong YH, Wang H (2010) Residues of veterinary antibiotics in manures from feedlot livestock in eight provinces of China. Sci Total Environ 408:1069–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.11.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zhou L-J, Ying G-G, Liu S et al (2012) Simultaneous determination of human and veterinary antibiotics in various environmental matrices by rapid resolution liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1244:123–138.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2012.04.076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zhou L-J, Ying G-G, Liu S et al (2013) Excretion masses and environmental occurrence of antibiotics in typical swine and dairy cattle farms in China. Sci Total Environ 444:183–195.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.087CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Luís Radis Steinmetz
    • 1
    Email author
  • Vanessa Gressler
    • 1
  1. 1.Embrapa Suínos e AvesConcórdiaBrazil

Personalised recommendations