Advertisement

Quality pp 189-216 | Cite as

Quality Without Democracy

  • Peter Dahler-LarsenEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the sociopolitical implications of quality. My assertion is that we live in times where quality without democracy is becoming increasingly pertinent.

References

  1. Ahrne, Göran, and Nils Brunsson. 2008. Organizing the World. In Transnational Governance, ed. M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bache, Ian, and Louise Reardon. 2016. The Politics and Policy of Wellbeing. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauman, Zygmunt. 1983. Industrialism, Consumerism and Power. Theory, Culture and Society 1 (3): 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 1987. Legislators and Interpreters. On Modernity, Postmodernity and Intellectuals. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. ———. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2001. Consuming Life. Journal of Consumer Culture 1 (1): 9–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. ———. 2002. Det Belejrede Samfund [Society Under Siege]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
  8. Berger, Peter L., Brigitte Berger, and Hansfried Kellner. 1973. The Homeless Mind: Modernization and Consciousness. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  9. Bevir, Mark. 2004. Governance and Interpretation: What are the Implications of Postfoundationalism? Public Administration 82 (3): 605–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boltanski, Luc. 2011. Pragmatisk Sociologi [Pragmatic Sociology. A Reader]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzel.Google Scholar
  11. Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2007. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. Bowbrick, Peter. 2014. The Economics of Quality, Grades and Brands. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Brown, Wendy. 2015. Undoing the Demos. New York: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  14. Brunsson, Nils. 2000. Organizations, Markets and Standardization. In A World of Standards, ed. N. Brunsson and B. Jacobsson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Dahler-Larsen, Peter. 2006. Evaluation After Disenchantment? Five Issues Shaping the Role of Evaluation in Society. In Handbook of Evaluation, ed. I.F. Shaw, J.C. Greene, and M.M. Mark, 123–140. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2012. The Evaluation Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Davies, William. 2011. Knowing the Unknowable: The Epistemological Authority of Innovation Policy Experts. Social Epistemology 25 (4): 401–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. ———. 2015. The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, Jacob. 2016. Almenvellets Affortryllelse – Neoliberale Anfægtelser af det Fælles Bedste [The Disenchantment of the Common Good – Neoliberal Contestations of the Common Good]. Slagmark 74 (Fall): 69–85.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, Jacob, and Niklas Olsen. 2016. Hvad Er Neoliberalisme? Redaktionelt Forord [What Is Neoliberalism? Editorial Foreword]. Slagmark 74 (Fall): 9–22.Google Scholar
  21. Julnes, George, ed. 2012. Promoting Value in the Public Interest: Informing Policies for Judging Value in Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, No. 133. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Kauko, Jaakko, Risto Rinne, and Tuomas Takala. 2018. Politics of Quality in Education. A Comparative Study of Brazil, China, and Russia. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kipnis, Andrew B. 2008. Audit Cultures: Neoliberal Governmentality, Socialist Legacy, or Technologies of Governing. American Ethnologist 35 (2): 275–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kushner, Saville. 2017. Evaluative Research Methods: Managing the Complexities of Judgment in the Field. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Mirowski, Philip. 2016. Den politiske bevægelse, der ikke turde ytre sit eget navn [The Political Movement Which Did Not Dare Speak in Its Own Name]. Slagmark 74 (Fall): 33–52.Google Scholar
  26. Morgan, Gareth. 1986. Images of Organization. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Mörth, Ulrika. 2008. Soft Regulation and Global Democracy. In Transnational Governance, ed. M.-L. Djelic and K. Sahlin-Andersson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Normand, Romuald. 2016. The Changing Epistemic Governance of European Education, the Fabrication of the Homo Academicus Europeanus? Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  29. Ozga, Jenny, Peter Dahler-Larsen, Christina Segerholm, and Hannu Simola. 2011. Fabricating Quality in Education: Data and Governance in Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Palonen, Kari. 2002. The History of Concepts as a Style of Political Theorizing: Quentin Skinner’s and Reinhart Koselleck’s Subversion of Normative Political Theory. European Journal of Political Theory 1 (1): 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2007. Re-thinking Politics: Essays from a Quarter-century. Finnish Political Science Association. Jyväskylä University Printing House.Google Scholar
  32. Pielke, Roger A. 2007. The Honest Broker, Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Porter, Theodore M. 1994. Making Things Quantitative. Science in Context 7 (3): 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Prewitt, Kenneth, Thomas A. Schwandt, and Miron L. Straf. 2012. Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rosa, Hartmut. 2003. Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High–Speed Society. Constellations 10 (1): 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. ———. 2005. The Speed of Global Flows and the Pace of Democratic Politics. New Political Science 27 (4): 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosanvallon, Pierre. 2009. Demokratin som Problem [Democracy as the Problem]. Hägersten: TankeKraft Förlag.Google Scholar
  38. Sennett, Richard. 2002. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  39. Sørensen, Eva M., and Jacob Torfing. 2009. Making Governance Networks Effective and Democratic through Metagovernance. Public Administration 87 (2): 234–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stark, David. 2009. The Sense of Dissonance, Accounts of Worth in Economic Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Strang, David, and John W. Meyer. 1994. Institutional Conditions for Diffusion. In Institutional Environments and Organizations, ed. W.R. Scott and J.W. Meyer, 100–112. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Thévenot, Laurent. 2001. Pragmatic Regumes Governing the Engagement with the World. In The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, ed. T.R. Schatzki, K.D. Knorr-Cetina, and E. von Savigny, 56–73. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Vedung, Evert. 1997. Public Policy and Program Evaluation. New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar
  44. Wallenburg, Iris, Julia Quartz, and Roland Bal. 2016. Making Hospitals Governable: Performativity and Institutional Work in Ranking Practices. Administration & Society: 1–27.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations