Advertisement

REWAS 2019 pp 143-152 | Cite as

Iron Recovery from Nickel Slag by Aluminum Dross: Viscosity Evolution in Different Periods

  • Guangzong Zhang
  • Nan WangEmail author
  • Min Chen
  • Ying Wang
  • Hui Li
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

Nickel slag can be recycled as one of the excellent secondary sources due to valuable iron resource. Slag viscosity during iron recovery from nickel slag by aluminum dross was studied from 1773 to 1873 K, and the viscosity evolution in different periods was systemically discussed. Experimental results showed that slag viscosity increased suddenly after “FeO”/(“FeO” + Al2O3) ratio lower than 0.53, signifying the transition of dominant role from “FeO” to Al2O3. Structure investigation by Raman spectra showed the center of curves transferred to higher shift, which indicated the formation of many more complicated structural units during the reduction process. Furthermore, the increasing units ratio (Q2 + Q3)/(Q0 + Q1) in [SiO4]-tetrahedra showed a good agreement with the variation of apparent activation energy.

Keywords

Nickel slag Aluminum dross Viscosity Slag structure 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant numbers 51774072, 51574066, 51574065 and 51774073] and the National Key R&D Program of China [Grant numbers 2017YFB0304201, 2017YFB0304203 and 2016YFB0300602].

References

  1. 1.
    Xu K (2008) Iron and steel industry development and technological innovation in China. Iron Steel 43:1–13Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guo H, Yin SH, Yu QJ, Yang X, Huang HL, Yang Y, Gao F (2018) Iron recovery and active residue production from basic oxygen furnace (BOF) slag for supplementary cementitious materials. Resour Conserv Recycl 129:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mills KC, Sridhar S (1999) Viscosities of ironmaking and steelmaking slags. Ironmak Steelmak 26:262–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Starodub K, Kuminova Y, Dinsdale A, Cheverikin V, Filichkina V, Saynazarov A, Khvan A, Kondratiev A (2016) Experimental investigation and modeling of copper smelting slags. Metall Mater Trans B 47B:2904–2918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen M, Zhao BJ (2016) Viscosity measurements of the SiO2–K2O–CaO system relevant to biomass slags. Fuel 180:638–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Park JH, Min DJ, Song HS (2004) Amphoteric behavior of alumina in viscous flow and structure of CaO–SiO2 (–MgO)–Al2O3 slags. Metall Mater Trans B 35B:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lee YS, Min DJ, Jung SM, Yi SH (2004) Influence of basicity and FeO content on viscosity of blast furnace type slags containing FeO. ISIJ Int 44:1283–1290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Zhang GZ, Wang N, Chen M, Li H (2018) Viscosity and structure of CaO–SiO2–‘FeO’–Al2O3–MgO system during iron-extracting process from nickel slag by aluminum dross. Part 1: coupling effect of ‘FeO’ and Al2O3. Steel Res Int 89:1800272Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhang GZ, Wang N, Chen M, Wang Y (2018) Viscosity and structure of CaO–SiO2–‘FeO’–Al2O3–MgO system during iron-extracting process from nickel slag by aluminum dross. Part 2: influence of Al2O3/SiO2 ratio. Steel Res Int 89:1800273Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mysen BO, Richet P (2005) Silicate glasses and melts: properties and structure, Henderson P (ed). Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp 267–284Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang WJ, Zhao YH, Yu S, Zhang LX, Ye ZC, Wang N, Chen M (2016) Viscosity property and structure analysis of FeO–SiO2–V2O3–TiO2–Cr2O3 slags. ISIJ Int 56:594–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gao JX, Wen GH, Huang T, Tang P, Liu Q (2018) Effects of the composition on the structure and viscosity of the CaO–SiO2–based mold flux. J Non-Cryst Solids 490:33–39Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maeharay T, Yano T, Shibata S, Yamane M (2004) Structure and phase transformation of alkali silicate melts analysed by Raman spectroscopy. Philos Mag 84:3085–3099CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toop GW, Samis CS (1962) Activities of ions in silicate melts. Trans Met Soc AIME 224:878–887Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Toplis MJ, Dingwell DB (2004) Shear viscosities of CaO–Al2O3–SiO2 and MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 liquids: implications for the structural role of aluminium and the degree of polymerisation of synthetic and natural aluminosilicate melts. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:5169–5188CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guangzong Zhang
    • 1
  • Nan Wang
    • 1
    Email author
  • Min Chen
    • 1
  • Ying Wang
    • 1
  • Hui Li
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MetallurgyNortheastern UniversityShenyangChina

Personalised recommendations