Advertisement

Review of Traffic Accident Predictions with Neural Networks

  • Biswajeet PradhanEmail author
  • Maher Ibrahim Sameen
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation book series (ASTI)

Abstract

Future prediction is one of the fascinating topics for human endeavor and is identified to be a vital tool in transportation management. Understanding the whole network of transportation is much difficult than on a single road. The main purpose of this effort is to provide a better route with high safety level and support the traffic managers in managing road network efficiently.

References

  1. Abdelwahab, H., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2001). Development of artificial neural network models to predict driver injury severity in traffic accidents at signalized intersections. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1746, 6–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelwahab, H., & Abdel-Aty, M. (2002). Artificial neural networks and logit models for traffic safety analysis of toll plazas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1784, 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed, A. A., & Pradhan, B. (2019). Vehicular traffic noise prediction and propagation modelling using neural networks and geospatial information system. Environmental monitoring and assessment, 191(3), 190.Google Scholar
  4. Akgüngör, A. P., & Dogan, E. (2008). Estimating road accidents of Turkey based on regression analysis and artificial neural network approach. Advances in Transportation studies, 2008(16), 11–22.Google Scholar
  5. Alizadeh, M., Ngah, I., Hashim, M., Pradhan, B., & Pour, A. (2018). A hybrid analytic network process and artificial neural network (ANP-ANN) model for urban earthquake vulnerability assessment. Remote Sensing, 10(6), 975.Google Scholar
  6. Azeez, O. S., Pradhan, B., Shafri, H. Z., Shukla, N., Lee, C. W., & Rizeei, H. M. (2019). Modeling of CO Emissions from Traffic Vehicles Using Artificial Neural Networks. Applied Sciences, 9(2), 313.Google Scholar
  7. Bui, D. T., Bui, Q. T., Nguyen, Q. P., Pradhan, B., Nampak, H., & Trinh, P. T. (2017). A hybrid artificial intelligence approach using GIS-based neural-fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization for forest fire susceptibility modeling at a tropical area. Agricultural and forest meteorology, 233, 32–44.Google Scholar
  8. Deka, L., & Quddus, M. (2014). Network-level accident-mapping: Distance based pattern matching using artificial neural network. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 65, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ghasemlou, K., Aydi, M. M., & Yildirim, M. S. (2015). Prediction of pedal cyclists and pedestrian fatalities from total monthly accidents and registered private car numbers. Archives of Transport, 34(2), 29–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Glymour, C., Madigan, D., Pregibon, D., & Smyth, P. (1997). Statistical themes and lessons for data mining. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Golhani, K., Balasundram, S. K., Vadamalai, G., & Pradhan, B. (2018). A review of neural networks in plant disease detection using hyperspectral data. Information Processing in Agriculture, 5(3), 354–371.Google Scholar
  12. Golhani, K., Balasundram, S. K., Vadamalai, G., & Pradhan, B. (2019). Selection of a Spectral Index for Detection of Orange Spotting Disease in Oil Palm (Elaeis guineensis Jacq.) Using Red Edge and Neural Network Techniques. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 1–8.Google Scholar
  13. Huang, H., Zeng, Q., Pei, X., Wong, S. C., & Xu, P. (2016). Predicting crash frequency using an optimised radial basis function neural network model. Transportmetrica: A Transport Science, 12(4), 330–345.Google Scholar
  14. Jadaan, K. S., Al-Fayyad, M., & Gammoh, H. F. (2014). Prediction of road traffic accidents in jordan using artificial neural network (ANN). Journal of Traffic and Logistics Engineering, 2(2), 92–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kalantar, B., Pradhan, B., Naghibi, S. A., Motevalli, A., & Mansor, S. (2018). Assessment of the effects of training data selection on the landslide susceptibility mapping: a comparison between support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR) and artificial neural networks (ANN). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 9(1), 49–69.Google Scholar
  16. Karlaftis, M. G., & Vlahogianni, E. I. (2011). Statistical methods versus neural networks in transportation research: Differences, similarities and some insights. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 19(3), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kia, M. B., Pirasteh, S., Pradhan, B., Mahmud, A. R., Sulaiman, W. N. A., & Moradi, A. (2012). An artificial neural network model for flood simulation using GIS: Johor River Basin, Malaysia. Environmental Earth Sciences, 67(1), 251–264.Google Scholar
  18. Kunt, M. M., Aghayan, I., & Noii, N. (2011). Prediction for traffic accident severity: comparing the artificial neural network, genetic algorithm, combined genetic algorithm and pattern search methods. Transport, 26(4), 353–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ngo, P. T., Hoang, N. D., Pradhan, B., Nguyen, Q., Tran, X., Nguyen, V., ... & Tien Bui, D. (2018). A Novel Hybrid Swarm Optimized Multilayer Neural Network for Spatial Prediction of Flash Floods in Tropical Areas Using Sentinel-1 SAR Imagery and Geospatial Data. Sensors, 18(11), 3704.Google Scholar
  20. Nourani, V., Pradhan, B., Ghaffari, H., & Sharifi, S. S. (2014). Landslide susceptibility mapping at Zonouz Plain, Iran using genetic programming and comparison with frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Natural hazards, 71(1), 523–547.Google Scholar
  21. Ogwueleka, F. N., Misra, S., Ogwueleka, T. C., & Fernandez-Sanz, L. (2014). An artificial neural network model for road accident prediction: a case study of a developing country. Acta Polytechnica Hungarica, 11(5), 177–197.Google Scholar
  22. Pradhan, B., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2010). Comparison and validation of landslide susceptibility maps using an artificial neural network model for three test areas in Malaysia. Environmental & Engineering Geoscience, 16(2), 107–126.Google Scholar
  23. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010a). Regional landslide susceptibility analysis using back-propagation neural network model at Cameron Highland, Malaysia. Landslides, 7(1), 13–30.Google Scholar
  24. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010b). Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environmental Earth Sciences, 60(5), 1037–1054.Google Scholar
  25. Pradhan, B., & Lee, S. (2010c). Landslide susceptibility assessment and factor effect analysis: backpropagation artificial neural networks and their comparison with frequency ratio and bivariate logistic regression modelling. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(6), 747–759.Google Scholar
  26. Pradhan, B., Lee, S., & Buchroithner, M. F. (2010). A GIS-based back-propagation neural network model and its cross-application and validation for landslide susceptibility analyses. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(3), 216–235.Google Scholar
  27. Sameen, M. I., & Pradhan, B. (2017a). A two-stage optimization strategy for fuzzy object-based analysis using airborne LiDAR and high-resolution orthophotos for urban road extraction. Journal of Sensors.‏Google Scholar
  28. Sameen, M. I., & Pradhan, B. (2017b). Assessment of the effects of expressway geometric design features on the frequency of accident crash rates using high-resolution laser scanning data and GIS. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, 8(2), 733–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2016.1265012.
  29. Sameen, M. I., & Pradhan, B. (2017c). A simplified semi-automatic technique for highway extraction from high-resolution airborne LiDAR data and orthophotos. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 45(3), 395–405.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-016-0610-5.
  30. Sameen, M. I., Pradhan, B., Shafri, H. Z. M., Mezaal, M. R., & Hamid, H. (2016). Integration of ant colony optimization and object-based analysis for LiDAR data classification. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 10(5), 2055–2066.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2017.2650956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sameen, M., & Pradhan, B. (2017). Severity prediction of traffic accidents with recurrent neural networks. Applied Sciences, 7(6), 476.Google Scholar
  32. Sohn, S. Y., & Lee, S. H. (2003). Data fusion, ensemble and clustering to improve the classification accuracy for the severity of road traffic accidents in Korea. Safety Science, 41(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sohn, S. Y., & Shin, H. (2001). Pattern recognition for road traffic accident severity in Korea. Ergonomics, 44(1), 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Taamneh, M., Taamneh, S., & Alkheder, S. (2016). Clustering-based classification of road traffic accidents using hierarchical clustering and artificial neural networks. International Journal of Injury Control and Safety Promotion, 1–8.Google Scholar
  35. Yilmaz, A., Aci, C., & Aydin, K. (2016). Traffic accident reconstruction and an approach for prediction of fault rates using artificial neural networks: A case study in Turkey. Traffic Injury Prevention, 17(6), 585–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zare, M., Pourghasemi, H. R., Vafakhah, M., & Pradhan, B. (2013). Landslide susceptibility mapping at Vaz Watershed (Iran) using an artificial neural network model: a comparison between multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basic function (RBF) algorithms. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(8), 2873–2888.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS)University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Advanced Modelling and Geospatial Information Systems (CAMGIS)University of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations