Advertisement

Systemic Effectiveness Matters

  • Catherine HobbsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

How? This chapter sets out the fifth and final stage of the Adaptive Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership which focuses on thinking about systemic effectiveness as the context of project management. There is one suggested resource which is signposted for thinking about systemic effectiveness, which is the Vanguard development of lean. Amongst other things, this approach combines thinking about efficiency with overall effectiveness from the client’s point of view. The operational principle for systemic effectiveness is clarity of purpose—often (curiously) something which is overlooked. The chapter concludes with the associated key facet of systemic leadership for this principle.

Vanguard Lean 

Bibliography

  1. Ackoff, R. L. (2004). Transforming the Systems Movement. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  2. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  3. Deming, W. E. (1982). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Game, C. (2012). The Barnet Graph of Doom—Not New or Classified, but Definitely Sensitive. Retrieved from https://inlogov.com/2012/05/23/barnet-graph-doom/.
  5. Gregory, A. J. (2007). Target Setting, Lean Systems and Viable Systems: A Systems Perspective on Control and Performance Measurement. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58, 1503–1517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hallsworth, M., Parker, S., & Rutter, J. (2011). Policy Making in the Real World. London: Institute for Government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hines, P., Found, P., Griffiths, G., & Harrison, R. (2008). Staying Lean, Thriving, Not Just Surviving. Cardiff: Cardiff University.Google Scholar
  8. Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to Evolve: A Review of Contemporary Lean Thinking. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (Ph.D. Systems Science), University of Hull, Hull, UK.Google Scholar
  10. Jackson, M. C., Johnston, N., & Seddon, J. (2008). Evaluating Systems Thinking in Housing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 186–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. KPMG, & Hull University Business School. (2010). Systems Thinking: Rising to the Challenges of the Public Sector. Hull, UK: KPMG & Hull University Business School.Google Scholar
  12. Leggat, S. G., Bartram, T., Stanton, P., Bamber, G. J., & Sohal, A. S. (2015). Have Process Redesign Methods, Such as Lean, Been Successful in Changing Care Delivery in Hospitals? A Systematic Review. Public Money & Management, 35(2), 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Locality, & Vanguard Consulting. (2014). Saving Money by Doing the Right Thing: Why ‘Local by Default’ Must Replace ‘Diseconomies of Scale’. London: Locality.Google Scholar
  14. National Audit Office. (2011). PaceSetter: HMRC’s Programme to Improve Business Operations, Summary Report. London: National Audit Office.Google Scholar
  15. O’Donovan, B. (2011). Systems Thinking in Adult Social Care: How Focusing on a Customer’s Purpose Leads to Better Services for the Vulnerable in Society and Enhances Efficiency. In K. Zokaei, J. Seddon, & B. O’Donovan (Eds.), Systems Thinking: From Heresy to Practice. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  16. O’Donovan, B. (2014). Editorial for Special Issue of SPAR: The Vanguard Method in a Systems Thinking Context. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 27(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ohno, T. (1988). The Toyota Production System: Beyond Large-Scale Production. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Price Waterhouse Coopers. (n.d.). Shifting Mindsets, Increasing Capacity: Driving Operational Excellence in the Public Sector. Price Waterhouse Coopers Public Sector.Google Scholar
  19. Radnor, Z., & Osborne, S. P. (2013). Lean: A Failed Theory for Public Services? Public Management Review, 15(2), 265–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Seddon, J. (2003). Freedom from Command and Control: A Better Way to Make the Work Work. Buckingham, UK: Vanguard Education Limited.Google Scholar
  21. Seddon, J. (2008). Systems Thinking in the Public Sector: The Failure of the Reform Regime... and a Manifesto for a Better Way. Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press Limited.Google Scholar
  22. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Organizational Learning. Milsons Point, NSW: Random House.Google Scholar
  23. Solace, Skills for Local Government, & Local Government Association. (2013). Asking the Right Questions: The Need for Transformational and New Contextual Leadership Skills for Local Authority Chief Executives. JSSC.Google Scholar
  24. Walker, R. M. (2014). Internal and External Antecedents of Process Innovation: A Review and Extension. Public Management Review, 16(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates, MacMillan.Google Scholar
  26. Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., Ongaro, E., & van Thiel, S. (2014). Innovation-Oriented Culture in the Public Sector: Do Managerial Autonomy and Result Control Lead to Innovation? Public Management Review, 16(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zokaei, K., Elias, S., O’Donovan, B., Samuel, D., Evans, B., & Goodfellow, J. (2010). Lean and Systems Thinking in the Public Sector in Wales. Lean Enterprise Research Centre report for the Wales Audit Office, Cardiff Business School.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Systems StudiesHull University Business SchoolCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations