Advertisement

Introduction: Local Government Reform and a Journey to the Empty Quarter

  • Catherine HobbsEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

The empty quarter. Hobbs immediately leads the reader to an unusual starting point. After outlining the rapid sequence of local government reforms imposed over several decades, Hobbs maintains that effective reform lies beyond the mechanistic paradigm. The abiding capacity-building themes of innovation and learning, collaboration and leadership, including oft-repeated barriers to progress, suggest that a variety of thinking skills is needed to address these complex challenges. Although a variety of approaches could help to address complexity (supply), practitioners (demand) are unaware of this variety, leading to a supply/demand dysfunction. A fundamental dilemma is that the usual disciplinary modes of thinking and working will not help us overcome these challenges. The chapter concludes with ‘a journey to the empty quarter’, explaining the form of thinking which is lacking.

Keywords

Local government Beyond the mechanistic paradigm Innovation Learning Collaboration Leadership Complexity 

Bibliography

  1. Abercrombie, R., Harries, E., & Wharton, R. (2015). Systems Change: A Guide to What It Is and How to Do It. London: New Philanthropy Capital.Google Scholar
  2. Ackoff, R. L. (1960). Systems, Organizations and Interdisciplinary Research. General Systems, 5(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  3. Ackoff, R. L. (2006). Why Few Organizations Adopt Systems Thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 705–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alford, J., & O’Flynn, J. (2009). Making Sense of Public Value: Concepts, Critiques and Emergent Meanings. International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, T., Grace, C., & Martin, S. (2014). From Analysis to Action: Connecting Research and Local Government in an Age of Austerity. London: Report of the Local Government Knowledge Navigator.Google Scholar
  6. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2011). Generating Research Questions Through Problematization. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 247–271.Google Scholar
  7. Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2013). Has Management Studies Lost Its Way? Ideas for More Imaginative and Innovative Research. Journal of Management Studies, 50(1), 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2010). Making the Business School More ‘Critical’: Reflexive Critique Based on Phronesis as a Foundation for Impact. British Journal of Management, 21, s6–s25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  10. Ashby, W. R. (1956). An Introduction to Cybernetics. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Atkinson, J., Loftus, E., & Jarvis, J. (2015). The Art of Change Making. London: The Leadership Centre.Google Scholar
  12. Bammer, G. (2013). Disciplining Interdisciplinarity: Integration and Implementation Sciences for Researching Complex Real-World Problems. Canberra, Australia: Australian National University E Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Benington, J. (Ed.). (2011). New Horizons for Local Governance (1st ed.). London: Warwick Business School and Local Authorities Research Councils’ Initiative.Google Scholar
  14. Benington, J., & Moore, M. H. (Eds.). (2010). Public Value: Theory and Practice. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Bennett, M. (Ed.). (2006). Localopolis: Governance and Citizenship in the 21st Century (1st ed.). London: SOLACE Foundation Imprint.Google Scholar
  16. Bennett, N., Wise, C., Woods, P., & Harvey, J. A. (2003). Distributed Leadership: A Review of the Literature. Nottingham, England: National College for School Leadership.Google Scholar
  17. Bichard, M. (2013). Editorial: The Need for a Public Service Strategy. Public Money & Management, 33(1), 3–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bolden, R., Gulati, A., Ahmad, Y., Burgoyne, J., Chapman, N., Edwards, G., et al. (2015). The Difference that Makes the Difference—Final Evaluation of the First Place-Based Programmes for Systems Leadership: Local Vision. Bristol: University of the West of England.Google Scholar
  19. Bourgon, J. (2014). Leadership: An Integrated Process of Change: A New Synthesis of Public Administration.Google Scholar
  20. Bourgon, J. (Ed.). (2010). A Public Service Renewal Agenda for the 21st Century: The New Synthesis Project (1st ed.). London: Public Governance International.Google Scholar
  21. Bramah, M., Durose, C., Griggs, S., & Reynolds, A. (2012). The Ensuring Council: An Alternative Vision for the Future of Local Government. Manchester: APSE.Google Scholar
  22. Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. United Nations.Google Scholar
  23. Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Propositions from the Literature. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 44–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Buckley, W. (1968). Society as a Complex Adaptive System. In W. Buckley (Ed.), Modern Systems Research for the Behavioral Scientist. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
  25. Byrne, D., & Callaghan, G. (2014). Complexity Theory and the Social Sciences: The State of the Art. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Cabinet Office. (2014). What Works? London: Evidence for Decision Makers.Google Scholar
  27. Cairney, P. (2010). Complexity Theory in Public Policy. Paper presented at the Political Studies Association Conference, Edinburgh. http://www.psa.ac.uk/2010/PanelDetails.aspx?PanelID=43.
  28. Capra, F. (1997). The Web of Life: A New Scientific Understanding of Living Systems. London: Flamingo and HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  29. Chapman, J. (2004). System Failure: Why Governments Must Learn to Think Differently (2nd ed.). London: Demos.Google Scholar
  30. Checkland, P., & Scholes, P. (1990). Soft Systems Methodology in Action. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Christiansen, J., & Bunt, L. (2012). Innovation in Policy: Allowing for Creativity. NESTA: Social Complexity and Uncertainty in Public Governance.Google Scholar
  32. Churchman, C. W. (1967). Guest Editorial: Wicked Problems. Management Science, 14(4), B141–B142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Churchman, C. W. (1977). A Philosophy for Complexity. In H. A. Linstone & W. H. Simmonds (Eds.), Managing Complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  34. Colander, D., & Kupers, R. (2014). Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society’s Problems from the Bottom Up. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Collm, A., & Schedler, K. (2014). Strategies for Introducing Organizational Innovation to Public Service Organizations. Public Management Review, 16(1), 140–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Commission on 2020 Public Services. (2010). From Social Security to Social Productivity: A Vision for 2020 Public Services. 2020 Public Services Trust at the RSA.Google Scholar
  37. Commission on the Future of Local Government. (2012). Final Report. Leeds: Commission on the Future of Local Government.Google Scholar
  38. Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. M. (2010). Integrative Leadership and the Creation and Maintenance of Cross-Sector Collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dunn, E. S. (1971). Economic and Social Development: A Process of Social Learning. Baltimore and London: The John Hopkins Press.Google Scholar
  40. Eden, C., Jones, S., & Sims, D. (1983). Messing About in Problems. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  41. Edler, J., Cunningham, P., Gök, A., & Shapira, P. (2013). Impacts of Innovation Policy: Synthesis and Conclusions. Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research.Google Scholar
  42. Espejo, R., & Reyes, A. (2011). Organizational Systems: Managing Complexity with the Viable System Model. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  43. Fernandez, S., Cho, Y. J., & Perry, J. L. (2010). Exploring the Link Between Integrated Leadership and Public Sector Performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 308–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fillingham, D., & Weir, B. (2014). System Leadership: Lessons and Learning from AQuA’s Integrated Care Discovery Communities. London: The King’s Fund.Google Scholar
  45. Flood, R. L., & Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  46. Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. A. (1996a). Contours of Diversity Management and Triple Loop Learning. Kybernetes, 25(7/8), 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Flood, R. L., & Romm, N. R. A. (Eds.). (1996b). Critical Systems Thinking: Current Research and Practice (1st ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  48. Friend, J. K., & Hickling, A. (2005). Planning Under Pressure (3rd ed.). Oxford: Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  49. Gerrits, L. (2012). Punching Clouds: An Introduction to the Complexity of Public Decision-Making. Litchfield Park, AZ: Emergent Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Geyer, R. (2012). Can Complexity Move UK Policy Beyond ‘Evidence-Based Policy Making’ and the ‘Audit Culture’? Applying a ‘Complexity Cascade’ to Education and Health Policy. Political Studies, 60(1), 20–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Geyer, R., & Cairney, P. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy (1st ed.). Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  52. Geyer, R., & Rihani, S. (2010). Complexity and Public Policy: A New Approach to 21st Century Politics, Policy and Society. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Ghate, D., Lewis, J., & Welbourne, D. (2013). Systems Leadership: Exceptional Leadership for Exceptional Times, Synthesis Paper. ADCS Virtual Staff College, the Colebrook Centre, Cass Business School, The Leadership Forum.Google Scholar
  54. Gillinson, S., Horne, M., & Baeck, P. (2010). Radical Efficiency: Different, Better, Low Cost Public Services. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
  55. Golden-Biddle, K. (2012). Publishing Qualitative Research Master Class Part 2. Chair in Strategic Management in Pluralistic Settings. Retrieved October 5, 2012, from http://chairepluralisme.hec.ca/en/videos/publishing-qualitative-research/.
  56. Goss, S. (2015). Systems Leadership: A View from the Bridge. London: OPM Group.Google Scholar
  57. Grace, C. (2012). Partners in Impact? The National and Local Imperative to Join Up Research and Local Government Post-LARCI. Local Authorities and Research Councils’ Initiative. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20180322130022/, http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/publications/archive/partnersinimpact/.
  58. Grace, C., & Martin, S. (2008). Getting Better All the Time? An Independent Assessment of Local Government Improvement and Its Future Prospects. London: IDeA (Improvement and Development Agency).Google Scholar
  59. Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations. Milbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant Leadership: A Journey into the Nature of Legitimate Power and Greatness. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
  61. Guilfoyle, S. (2012). On Target?—Public Sector Performance Management: Recurrent Themes, Consequences and Questions. Policing, 6(3), 250–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Hallsworth, M., Parker, S., & Rutter, J. (2011). Policy Making in the Real World. London: Institute for Government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Hartley, J., Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2013). Collaborative Innovation: A Viable Alternative to Market Competition and Organizational Entrepreneurship. Public Administration Review, 73(6), 821–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Hastings, A., Bailey, N., Bramley, G., Gannon, M., & Watkins, D. (2015). The Cost of the Cuts: The Impact on Local Government and Poorer Communities. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.Google Scholar
  65. Haynes, P. (2003). Managing Complexity in the Public Services. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  66. Heifetz, R. A. (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers (Vol. 465). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hobbs, C. (2008). System Recovery: A Proposed Retreat to Messier Places to Consider an Emergent Model of Public Policy-Making. Unpublished master’s thesis, Institute of Local Government Studies, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.Google Scholar
  68. Hobbs, C. (2015). Local Government Service Design Skills Through the Appreciation of Complexity. In R. Geyer & P. Cairney (Eds.), Handbook on Complexity and Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  69. Hobbs, C. (2016). Tapping the Resource Within? Exploring a Learning Pathway for Systemic Leadership Within Local Governance Networks. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Ph.D. Systems Science, University of Hull, Hull, UK.Google Scholar
  70. Homer-Dixon, T. (2010). Complexity Science and Public Policy John L. Manion Lecture. Ottawa: National Arts Centre.Google Scholar
  71. Hood, C. (1991). A Public Management for All Seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The Middle Aging of New Public Management: Into the Age of Paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Huxham, C. (2003). Theorizing Collaboration Practice. Public Management Review, 5(3), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Jackson, M. C. (1999). Towards Coherent Pluralism in Management Science. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 50(1), 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Jackson, M. C. (2003). Systems Thinking: Creative Holism for Managers. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  76. Jackson, M. C. (2006). Creative Holism: A Critical Systems Approach to Complex Problem Situations. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 647–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Jackson, M. C., & Keys, P. (1984). Towards a System of Systems Methodologies. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35(6), 473–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Jackson, P. M. (2011). Governance by Numbers: What Have We Learned Over the Past 30 Years? Public Money & Management, 31(1), 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Jackson, T. (2017). Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  80. Kant, I., & Jäsche, G. B. (1800). Immanuel Kants Logik: Ein Handbuch zu Vorlesungen. Bey F. Nicolovius.Google Scholar
  81. Kauffman, S. A. (2000). Investigations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Kelly, G., & Muers, S. (2002). Creating Public Value: An Analytical Framework for Public Service Reform. London: Strategy Unit, Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  83. Kippin, H., & Randle, A. (2017). From Cooperative Councils to Cooperative Places. London.Google Scholar
  84. Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. F. (2016). Governance Networks in the Public Sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  85. Klingner, D. E. (2006). Building Global Public Management Governance Capacity: “The Road Not Taken”. Public Administration Review, 66(5), 775–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. KPMG, & Hull University Business School. (2010). Systems Thinking: Rising to the Challenges of the Public Sector. Hull, UK: KPMG & Hull University Business School.Google Scholar
  87. Leadbeater, C. (2011). Governing for Innovation: Helping Families Out of Chronic Crisis. In J. Benington (Ed.), New Horizons for Local Governance. Warwick Business School and Local Authorities Research Councils’ Initiative.Google Scholar
  88. Leadership Centre for Local Government. (2010). Total Place: A Practitioners Guide to Doing Things Differently. London, UK: Local Government Association.Google Scholar
  89. Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2012). Local Governance Under the Coalition Government: Austerity, Localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies, 38(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Lowndes, V., & Sullivan, H. (2004). Like a Horse and Carriage or a Fish on a Bicycle: How Well Do Local Partnerships and Public Participation Go Together? Local Government Studies, 30(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Maxwell, N. (1992). What Kind of Inquiry Can Best Help Us Create a Good World? Science, Technology and Human Values, 17(2), 205–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Meadows, D. H. (1999). Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Hartland, VT: The Sustainability Institute.Google Scholar
  93. Meynhardt, T. (2009). Public Value Inside: What Is Public Value Creation? International Journal of Public Administration, 32(3–4), 192–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Mingers, J., & Gill, A. (Eds.). (1997). Multimethodology (1st ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  96. Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA, London, England: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  97. Morcol, G. (2012). A Complexity Theory for Public Policy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  98. Morgan, G. (2000). Images of Organisation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  99. Morrell, K., & Harrington-Buhay, N. (2012). What Is Governance in the Public Interest? The Case of the 1995 Property Forum in Post-conflict Nicaragua. Public Administration, 90(2), 412–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Moynihan, D. P., & Landuyt, N. (2009). How Do Public Organizations Learn? Bridging Cultural and Structural Perspectives. Public Administration Review, 69(6), 1097–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Mulgan, G. (2001). Systems Thinking and the Practice of Local Government. Systemist, 23, 23–29.Google Scholar
  102. Mulgan, G. (2009). The Art of Public Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  103. Mulgan, G., & Leadbeater, C. (2013). Systems Innovation: Discussion Paper. London: NESTA.Google Scholar
  104. Needham, C., & Mangan, C. (2014). The 21st Century Public Servant. University of Birmingham. https://21stcenturypublicservant.files.wordpress.com/2014/09/21-century-report-281014.pdf.
  105. Nikolou-Walker, E. (2007). Critical Reflections on an Evaluative Comparative Analysis of Work-Based Learning Through Organizational Change Mechanisms. Reflective Practice, 8(4), 525–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Observatory of Public Sector Innovation. (2017). Working with Change: Systems Approaches to Public Sector Challenges. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  107. OECD Global Science Forum. (2009). Applications of Complexity Science for Public Policy: New Tools for Finding Unanticipated Consequences and Unrealized Opportunities. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  108. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, The Tavistock Institute, SOLON Consultants, & Local Government Information Unit. (2006). All Our Futures: The Challenges for Local Governance in 2015. London: ODPM.Google Scholar
  109. Osborne, S. P. (2006). The New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Oyarce, C. M. (Ed.). (2011). Redefining Local Government (1st ed.). Public Management and Policy Association.Google Scholar
  111. Oyarce, C. M., Accenture, Boardman, F., & Public Management and Policy Association. (2012). Public Service Reform in the UK: Revolutionary or Evolutionary? London: CIPFA.Google Scholar
  112. Pettigrew, A. M. (1997). The Double Hurdles for Management Research. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Advancement in Organizational Behaviour: Essays in Honour of D.S. Pugh (pp. 277–296). London: Dartmouth Press.Google Scholar
  113. Price Waterhouse Coopers. (2013). Redefining Local Government. Retrieved March 21, 2017, from https://www.pwc.lu/en/public-sector/docs/pwc-redefining-local-government.pdf.
  114. Price Waterhouse Coopers. (n.d.). Shifting Mindsets, Increasing Capacity: Driving Operational Excellence in the Public Sector. Price Waterhouse Coopers Public Sector.Google Scholar
  115. Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2008). Long-Term Evaluation of the Beacon Scheme. Organizational Learning, Knowledge and Capacity: A Systematic Literature Review for Policy-Makers, Managers and Academics. DCLG, London: Warwick Business School.Google Scholar
  116. Rashman, L., Withers, E., & Hartley, J. (2009). Organizational Learning and Knowledge in Public Service Organizations: A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 463–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Reynolds, M., & Holwell, S. (Eds.). (2010). Systems Approaches to Managing Change: A Practical Guide (1st ed.). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  118. Rhodes, M. L., Murphy, J., Muir, J., & Murray, J. A. (2011). Public Management and Complexity Theory: Richer Decision-Making in Public Services. New York, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The New Governance: Governing Without Government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. Rhodes, R. A. W. (2015). Recovering the Craft of Public Administration. Public Administration Review. Retrieved April 12, 2016, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/puar.12504.
  121. Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Robinson, J. B. (1990). Futures Under Glass: A Recipe for People Who Hate to Predict. Futures, 22(8), 820–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Sandberg, J., & Alvesson, M. (2011). Ways of Constructing Research Questions: Gap-Spotting or Problematization? Organization, 18(1), 23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Sapir, E. (1931). Social Communication (Vol. 4). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  125. Seddon, J. (2003). Freedom from Command and Control: A Better Way to Make the Work Work. Buckingham, UK: Vanguard Education Limited.Google Scholar
  126. Seddon, J. (2008). Systems Thinking in the Public Sector: The Failure of the Reform Regime… and a Manifesto for a Better Way. Axminster, UK: Triarchy Press Limited.Google Scholar
  127. Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of Organizational Learning. Milsons Point, NSW: Random House.Google Scholar
  128. Senge, P., Hamilton, H., & Kania, J. (2015). The Dawn of System Leadership. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 13(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  129. Smuts, J. C. (1927). Holism and Evolution. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  130. Snowden, D. J., & Boone, M. E. (2007). A Leader’s Framework for Decision Making. Harvard Business Review, 85(11), 68–76.Google Scholar
  131. Solace, Skills for Local Government, & Local Government Association. (2013). Asking the Right Questions: The Need for Transformational and New Contextual Leadership Skills for Local Authority Chief Executives. JSSC.Google Scholar
  132. Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2012). Introduction: Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Innovation Journal, 17(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  133. Stake, R. E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, London, and New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  134. Stoker, G. (2003). Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour. Hampshire and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  135. Strijbos, S. (1995). How Can Systems Thinking Help Us in Bridging the Gap Between Science and Wisdom? Systems Practice, 8(4), 361–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. Sullivan, H. (2010). Collaboration Matters: College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  137. Timmins, N. (2015). The Practice of System Leadership: Being Comfortable with Chaos. London: King’s Fund.Google Scholar
  138. Tsoukas, H., & Hatch, M. J. (2001). Complex Thinking, Complex Practice: The Case for a Narrative Approach to Organizational Complexity. Human Relations, 54(8), 979–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy. Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  140. van de Ven, A. H. (2007). Engaged Scholarship: A Guide for Organizational Research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  141. Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2011). The Tangled Web: Unraveling the Principle of Common Goals in Collaborations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 731–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. Vize, R. (2014). The Revolution Will Be Improvised: Stories and Insights About Transforming Systems. Local Vision. http://leadershipforchange.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/Revolution-will-be-improvised-publication-v31.pdf.
  143. Wenger, E. (1999). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  144. White, L. (2001). ‘Effective Governance’ Through Complexity Thinking and Management Science. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18, 241–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. Williams, B., & Hummelbrunner, R. (2010). Systems Concepts in Action: A Practitioner’s Toolkit. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  146. Williams, I., & Shearer, H. (2011). Appraising Public Value: Past, Present and Futures. Public Administration, 89(4), 1367–1384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. Williams, P. (2012). Collaboration in Public Policy and Practice: Perspectives on Boundary Spanners. Bristol, England: The Policy Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. Wynen, J., Verhoest, K., Ongaro, E., & van Thiel, S. (2014). Innovation-Oriented Culture in the Public Sector: Do Managerial Autonomy and Result Control Lead to Innovation? Public Management Review, 16(1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Systems StudiesHull University Business SchoolCumbriaUK

Personalised recommendations