Advertisement

2D Seismic Prospecting of Gas Pockets

  • Polina V. StogniiEmail author
  • Nikolay I. Khokhlov
Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 133)

Abstract

Gas emissions occur quite often in the North seas while carrying out oil-extracting works in the area. It is very important to be able to forecast such gas accumulations spread for further taking appropriate measures to avoid such emissions. This chapter represents the results of modeling of the spread of seismic waves in the layered structure of soil with present gas pockets for the 2D formulation of the problem. The seismograms and wave pictures have been obtained. The approach of gas layers towards the surface of the integration area on the 4th year of computation is shown.

Keywords

2D seismic prospecting Gas pockets Grid-characteristic method 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation (No. 2.9901.2017/8.9).

References

  1. 1.
    Petrov, I.B.: Numerical problems of the modeling of natural and industrial processes in the Arctic zone of the Russian Federation. Chebyshevskii Sbornik 418(3), 428–443 (2017). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Judd, A., Hovland, M. S.: Seabed Fluid Flow. The Impact on Geology, Biology and the Marine Environment. Cambridge (2007)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bogoyavlenskiy, V.I., Tupysev, M.K., Titovskiy, A.L., Pushkarev, V.A.: Rational environmental management of regions with natural gas accumulations in upper parts of a layer. Vesti Gazovoy Nauki 2(26), 1–5 (2016). (in Russian)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Xue, L., Fan, J., Rausand, M., Zhang, L.: A safety barrier-based accident model for offshore drilling blowouts. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26(1), 164–171 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, K. (ed.): Environmental Engineering and Computer Application. Taylor & Francis Group, London (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Holand, P.: Offshore Blowouts: Causes and Control. Guif Publishing Company, Houston, Texas, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kvenvolden, K.A.: Potential effect of gas hydrate on human welfare. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A 96(7), 3420–3426 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Collett, T.S., Ginsburg, G.D.: Gas hydrates in messoyakha gas field of the west Siberian basin—A re-examination of the geologic evidence. Int. Soc. Offshore Polar Eng. 8(1), 22–29 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collett, T.S.: Gas hydrate resources of northern Alaska. Bull. Can. Petrol. Geol. 45(3), 317–338 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collett, T., Johnson, C., Knapp, C., Boswell, R.: Natural gas hydrates—energy resource potential and associated geologic hazards. AAPG Memoir. 89, 146–219 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xu, W., Ruppel, C.: Predicting the occurrence, distribution and evolution of methane gas hydrate in porous marine sediments. J. Geophys. Res. 104(B3), 5081–5095 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kurlenya, M.V., Serdyukov, A.S., Duchkov, A.A., Serdyukov, S.V.: Wave tomography of methane pockets in coal bed. J. Min. Sci. 50(4), 617–622 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Novatskii, V.: Theory of Elasticity. Government Scientific Publishing House, Warsaw (1970)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Landau, L.D., Lifshitz, E.M.: Course of Theoretical Physics. vol. 6, 2 edn. Pergamon Press Oxford, New York, Beijing, Frankfurt, Sao Paulo, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto (1987)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Magomedov, K.M., Kholodov, A.S.: Grid-Characteristic Numerical Methods. Nauka, Moscow (1988). (in Russian)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Golubev, V.I., Gilyazutdinov, R.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I., Vasyukov, A.V.: Simulation of dynamic processes in three-dimensional layered fractured media with the use of the grid-characteristic numerical method. J. Appl. Mech. Tech. Phys. 58(3), 539–545 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kvasov, I.E., Pankratov, S.A., Petrov, I.B.: Computation modeling of seismic response in multilayeredgeologic medium by the grid-characteristic method. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 22(9), 13–21 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Muratov, M.V., Petrov, I.B., Sannikov, A.V., Favorskaya, A.V.: Grid-characteristic method on unstructured tetrahedral meshes. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 54(5), 837–847 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Favorskaya, A.V., Petrov, I.B.: A study of high-order-characteristic methods on unstructured grids. Num. Anal. Appl. 9(2), 171–178 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Golubev, V.I., Petrov, I.B., Khokhlov, N.I.: Compact grid-characteristic schemes of higher orders of accuracy for a 3D linear transport equation. Math. Models Comput. Simul. 28(2), 123–132 (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kholodov, A.S., Kholodov, Ya.A.: Monotonocity criteria for difference schemes designed for hyperbolic equations. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 46(9), 1560–1588 (2006)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jinxian, H., Xiaoli, Z., Ma, L., Wu, H., Ashraf, M.A.: Geological characteristics of unconventional gas in coal measure of upper Paleozoic measures in Ordos basin. Earth Sci. Res. J. 20(1), (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/esrj.v20n1.54140

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology (MIPT)Dolgoprudny, Moscow RegionRussian Federation
  2. 2.Scientific Research Institute for System Studies of the RASMoscowRussian Federation

Personalised recommendations