Synthesis and Electrocatalytic Properties of Ni–Fe-Layered Double Hydroxide Nanomaterials

  • Mengxin Miao
  • Xiaobo Han
  • Rulong Jia
  • Wei MaEmail author
  • Guihong HanEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)


Designing efficient electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction (OER) is very important for renewable energy storage. Layered double hydroxides (LDHs) attract widespread attention because of their excellent performance in electrochemical oxygen evolution. In this paper, the layered catalyst materials with different ratio of Ni and Fe were synthesized by one-pot hydrothermal synthesis technique. It was found that the Ni–Fe-layered double hydroxides with a ratio of 3:1 had a higher catalytic activity for oxygen evolution with an overpotential of 366 mV and a Tafel slope of 38.34 mV dec−1. The Ni–Fe compound with the ratio of 3:1 hold a higher electrical conductivity when the Ni–Fe LDH was calcinated at 600 °C and nitrogen protection conditions, resulting in a higher catalytic activity for oxygen evolution reactions. And its overpotential is 270 mV and the Tafel slope is 32.8 mV dec−1.


Layered double hydroxide Electrolyte Oxygen evolution reaction 



The authors acknowledge the financial support provided by the National Science Fund of China (No. 51674225, No. 51774252), the Innovative Talents Foundation in Universities in Henan Province (No. 18HASTIT011), the Educational Commission of Henan Province of China (No. 17A450001, 18A450001), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2017M622375).


  1. 1.
    Chu S, Majumdar A (2012) Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488(7411):294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook TR, Dogutan DK, Reece SY et al (2010) solar energy supply and storage for the legacy and nonlegacy worlds. Chem Rev 110(11):6474–6502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Benson EE, Kubiak CP, Sathrum AJ et al (2008) Electrocatalytic and homogeneous approaches to conversion of CO2 to liquid fuels. Cheminformatics 38(1):89–99Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turner JA (2004) Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305(5686):972–974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zeng K, Zhang DK (2010) Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications. Prog Energy Combust Sci 36(3):307–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marini S, Salvi P, Nelli P et al (2012) Advanced alkaline water electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 82(82):384–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Carrette L, Friedrich KA, Stimming U (2015) Fuel cells—Fundamentals and applications. Fuel Cells 1(1):5–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Aricò AS, Srinivasan S, Antonucci V (2015) DMFCs: From fundamental aspects to technology development. Fuel Cells 1(2):133–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Palacin MR (2009) Cheminform abstract: recent advances in rechargeable battery materials: a chemist’s perspective. Chem Soc Rev 38(9):2565–2575CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Suntivich J, Gasteiger HA, Yabuuchi N et al (2011) Design principles for oxygen-reduction activity on perovskite oxide catalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. Nat Chem 3(8):546–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cheng F, Chen J (2012) Metal-air batteries: from oxygen reduction electrochemistry to cathode catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 41(6):2172–2192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lee Y, Suntivich J, May KJ et al (2012) Synthesis and activities of Rutile IrO2 and RuO2 nanoparticles for oxygen evolution in acid and alkaline solutions. J Phys Chem Lett 3(3):399–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Chemical Engineering and EnergyZhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations