Modeling a Datacenter State Through a Novel Weight Corrected AHP Algorithm

  • Weiliang Tan
  • Yuqing LanEmail author
  • Daliang Fang
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 262)


Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is an effective algorithm for determining the weight of each module of a model. It is generally used in the process of multi-indicator decision making. But, when using AHP for evaluation, it is inevitable to introduce the evaluator’s subjectivity. In this paper, an algorithm based on Bayes’ formula is proposed for correcting the weights determined by the analytic hierarchy process. This algorithm can reduce the subjectivity of the evaluator introduced during the evaluation process. At the same time, the common operational indicators of a data center are summarized and classified. I chose some relatively important indicators and established an evaluation model for the operational status of the data center. The weight of the modules of the established model is corrected using this improved algorithm.


Analytic hierarchy process Datacenter indicators Cloud datacenter evaluation model Bayes’ formula 


  1. 1.
    LNCS Homepage. Accessed 21 Nov 2016
  2. 2.
    Meng, S., Liu, L., Wang, T.: State monitoring in cloud datacenters[J]. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 23(9), 1328–1344 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gunawi, H.S., Hao, M., Suminto, R.O., et al.: Why does the cloud stop computing?: Lessons from hundreds of service outages[C]. In: Proceedings of the Seventh ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 1–16. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Saaty, T.L.: Analytic hierarchy process[M]. Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, pp. 52–64. Springer, Boston, MA (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kim, D.S., Machida, F., Trivedi, K.S.: Availability modeling and analysis of a virtualized system[C]. In: 15th IEEE Pacific Rim International Symposium on Dependable Computing, 2009. PRDC 2009, pp. 365–371. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jolliffe, I.: Principal component analysis[M]. International encyclopedia of statistical science, pp. 1094–1096. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Saaty, T.L.: How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process[J]. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 48(1), 9–26 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., et al.: A view of cloud computing[J]. Commun. ACM 53(4), 50–58 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A., et al.: Above the clouds: a berkeley view of cloud computing[J]. Dept. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci.28(13) (2009). University of California, Berkeley, Rep. UCB/EECSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rimal, B.P., Choi, E., Lumb, I.: A taxonomy and survey of cloud computing systems[C]. In: Fifth International Joint Conference on INC, IMS and IDC, 2009. NCM2009, pp. 44–51. IEEE (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barroso, L.A., Clidaras, J., Hölzle, U.: The datacenter as a computer: an introduction to the design of warehouse-scale machines[J]. Synth. Lect. Comput. Arch. 8(3), 1–154 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson, T.W., Anderson, T.W., Anderson, T.W., et al.: An introduction to multivariate statistical analysis[M]. Wiley, New York (1958)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang, L., Khan, S.U.: Review of performance metrics for green data centers: a taxonomy study[J]. J. Supercomput. 63(3), 639–656 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and TechnologyBeihang UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations