Advertisement

Effect of Calibration Set Selection on Quantitatively Determining Test Weight of Maize by Near-Infrared Spectroscopy

  • Lianping Jia
  • Peng Jiao
  • Junning Zhang
  • Zhen Zeng
  • Xunpeng Jiang
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 509)

Abstract

To study the effect of calibration set on quantitatively determining test weight of maize by near-infrared spectroscopy, 584 maize samples were collected and scanned for near-infrared spectral data. Test weight was measured following the standard GB 1353-2009, resulting the sample test weight of 693–732 g•L−1. Two calibration models were respectively built using partial least squares regression, based on two different calibration sets. Test weight of two calibration sets distribute differently, with normal and homogeneous distributions. Both quantitative models were selected by root mean square error of cross validation (RMSECV), and evaluated by validation set. Results show the RMSECV of the model based on normal distribution calibration set is 4.28 g•L−1, the RMSECV of the model based on homogeneous distribution calibration set is 2.99 g•L−1, the predication of two models have significant difference for the samples with high or low test weight.

Keywords

Test weight Near-infrared Calibration set selection 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported financially by the National key research and development program (Project No. 2016YFD0700204) and S&T Nova Program of Beijing (Project No. Z1511000003150116).

References

  1. 1.
    China Feed Industry Association: China Feed Industry Yearbook (2015). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang, B.J., Yang, X.L., Qi, B.Z.: Comparison of quality safety standards of maize in China with other foreign country. Rev. China Agric. Sci. Technol. 4(5), 10–14 (2002). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnston, L.J.: Use of low-test-weight corn in swine diets and the lysine/protein relationship in corn. J. Swine Health Prod. 3(4), 161–164 (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhang, X.: Discussion on measuring result error of corn bulk density. Grain Distrib. Technol. 2, 27–28 (2005). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perez-Marin, D., Fearn, T., Guerrero, J.E., Garrido-Varo, A.: A methodology based on NIR-microscopy for the detection of animal protein by-products. Talanta 80(1), 48–53 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, L.J., Yang, Z.L., Han, L.J.: A review on the use of near-infrared spectroscopy for analyzing feed protein materials. Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 48(7), 509–522 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu, X.L., Lu, W.Z.: Research and application progress of near infrared spectroscopy analytical technology in China in the past five years. Sepctrosc. Spectr. Anal. 34(10), 2595–2605 (2014). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pomeranz, Y., Hall, G.E., Czuchajowska, Z., Lai, F.S.: Test weight, hardness, and breakage susceptibility of yellow dent corn hybrids. Cereal Chem. 63(4), 349–351 (1986)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siska, J., Hurburgh, C.T.: Corn density measurement by near-infrared transmittance. Trans. ASAE 38(6), 1821–1824 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Li, J.T.: Study on the rapid evaluation of nutrient values of corn and wheat by near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. China Agricultural University, Beijing (2014). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cai, H.Z., Bi, W.Q., Chu, J.Z., Li, H.H.: Study on the relationship between maize unit weight and the water content. J. Zhengzhou Inst. Technol. 22(3), 70–72 (2001). (in Chinese)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kenard, R.W., Stone, L.: Computer aided design of experiments. Technometrics 11, 137–148 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pérez-Marı́n, D.C., Garrido-Varo, A., Guerrero-Ginel, J.E., Gómez-Cabrera, A.: Near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS) for the mandatory labelling of compound feeding stuffs: chemical composition and open-declaration. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 116(3–4), 333-349 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roza-Delgado, B., Soldado, A., Garrido-Varo, A.M., Pérez-Marı́n, D., Haba, M.J., Guerrero-Ginel, J.E.: Application of near-infrared microscopy (NIRM) for the detection of meat and bone meals in animal feeds: a tool for food and feed safety. Food Chem. 105(3), 1164–1170 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yang, Z.L., Han, L.J., Li, Q.F., Fan, X.: Use of discriminant analysis on NIRS to detect meat-and-bone meal content in ruminant concentrates. J. Anim. Feed. Sci. 16, 442–447 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Malley, D.F., Mcclure, C., Martin, P.D.: Compositional analysis of cattle manure during composting using a field-portable near-infrared spectrometer. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 36(4), 455–475 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chu, X.L., Yuan, H.F., Lu, W.Z.: Progress and application of spectral data pretreatment and wavelength selection methods in NIR analytical technique. Prog. Chem. 4, 528–542 (2004). (in Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lianping Jia
    • 1
  • Peng Jiao
    • 1
  • Junning Zhang
    • 2
  • Zhen Zeng
    • 3
  • Xunpeng Jiang
    • 1
  1. 1.COFCO Feed Co., LtdBeijingChina
  2. 2.Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Patent Examination of Cooperation Beijing Center of the Patent OfficeSIPOBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations