Advertisement

Spatial Asynchronous Visuo-Tactile Stimuli Influence Ownership of Virtual Wings

  • Anastassia AndreasenEmail author
  • Niels Christian Nilsson
  • Stefania Serafin
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 265)

Abstract

Previous studies revealed that a compelling illusion of virtual body ownership (VBO) might be achieved under a condition of recognizable anatomical and morphological similarities to human body. Though certain deviations from morphology might be acceptable (e.g. virtual tails, longer arm or larger belly), if external limbs are responsible for specific functions in conjunction with a certain virtual scenario. Thus, this study aims at showing a possibility to achieve a compelling VBO illusion over a non-human avatar in a virtual environment. The paper describes a within-subjects study exploring if immersed users could achieve a compelling VBO illusion when inhabiting a virtual body of a bat. Test subjects experienced visuo-tactile stimulation of their arms while seeing an object touching their virtual wings. The mapping between the real and virtual touch points varied across three conditions: no offset between the visual and the tactile input, 50% offset, and 70% offset from the tactile input. The results revealed variations in the degree of experienced VBO across the conditions. The illusion was broken in the absence of visuo-tactile stimulation.

Keywords

Virtual and augmented realities Novel applications Interactive environments 

References

  1. 1.
    Andreasen, A., Nilsson, N.Chr., Serafin, S.: Spatial asynchronous visuo-tactile stimuli influence ownership of virtual wings. In: IEEE Virtual Reality 2018. IEEE Press (2018)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Argelaguet, F., Hoyet, L., Trico, M., Lécuyer, A.: The role of interaction in virtual embodiment: effects of the virtual hand representation. In: 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 3–10. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biocca, F.: The cyborg’s dilemma: progressive embodiment in virtual environments. J. Comput.-Mediat. Commun. 3(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Botvinick, M., Cohen, J.: Rubber hands’ feel’touch that eyes see. Nature 391(6669), 756 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fenton, M.B., Simmons, N.B.: Bats: A World of Science and Mystery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gonzalez-Franco, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Spanlang, B., Slater, M.: The contribution of real-time mirror reflections of motor actions on virtual body ownership in an immersive virtual environment. In: 2010 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR), pp. 111–114. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Heeter, C.: Being there: the subjective experience of presence. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 1(2), 262–271 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    IJsselsteijn, W.A., de Kort, Y.A.W., Haans, A.: Is this my hand I see before me? The rubber hand illusion in reality virtual reality and mixed reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 15(4), 455–464 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kalckert, A., Ehrsson, H.H.: Moving a rubber hand that feels like your own: a dissociation of ownership and agency. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 6, 40 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kilteni, K., Groten, R., Slater, M.: The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 21(4), 373–387 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kilteni, K., Normand, J.-M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V., Slater, M.: Extending body space in immersive virtual reality: a very long arm illusion. PLoS One 7(7), e40867 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Longo, M.R., Kammers, M.P.M., Gomi, H., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P.: Contraction of body representation induced by proprioceptive conflict. Curr. Biol. 19(17), R727–R728 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Longo, M.R., Schüür, F., Kammers, M.P.M., Tsakiris, M., Haggard, P.: What is embodiment? A psychometric approach. Cognition 107(3), 978–998 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maselli, A., Slater, M.: The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 7, 83 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maselli, A., Slater, M.: Sliding perspectives: dissociating ownership from self-location during full body illusions in virtual reality. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 693 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Normand, J.-M., Giannopoulos, E., Spanlang, B., Slater, M.: Multisensory stimulation can induce an illusion of larger belly size in immersive virtual reality. PLoS One 6(1), e16128 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petkova, V.I., Ehrsson, H.H.: If I were you: perceptual illusion of body swapping. PLoS One 3(12), e3832 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Slater, M., Perez-Marcos, D., Ehrsson, H.H., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Towards a digital body: the virtual arm illusion. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2, 6 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Steptoe, W., Steed, A., Slater, M.: Human tails: ownership and control of extended humanoid avatars. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(4), 583–590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsakiris, M.: My body in the brain: a neurocognitive model of body-ownership. Neuropsychologia 48(3), 703–712 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tsakiris, M., Carpenter, L., James, D., Fotopoulou, A.: Hands only illusion: multisensory integration elicits sense of ownership for body parts but not for non-corporeal objects. Exp. Brain Res. 204(3), 343–352 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tsakiris, M., Schütz-Bosbach, S., Gallagher, S.: On agency and body-ownership: phenomenological and neurocognitive reflections. Conscious. Cogn. 16(3), 645–660 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Varela, F.J., Thompson, E., Rosch, E.: The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Multisensory Experience LabAalborg University, CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations