This paper explores how Donna Haraway’s “String Figuration” together with Maria Puig de la Bellacasa’s concept of “touch” as a design method have worked in the process of an augmented reality (AR) play called Play/ce. The aim of this paper is to propose that designers of playful cities are creating the conditions for playability to show how players can try out and play with responses in a city by different acts of touch. I suggest that responding, which comes from the act of relaying, is part of designing ‘games as a social technologies’, a concept from Mary Flanagan. I will develop this concept since I think it is especially interesting to take into account when it comes to using cities as playgrounds and turn people into full body players to explore what touch means.


Playability Responding Social technology Touch String figure City 



I want to thank everyone involved in the making of Play/ce so far, my co-researchers Pirjo Elovaara and Cecilia Barry, Jonas Svegland for technical expertise, the municipality of Karlshamn, the youth council and in particular the players who have contributed with their time and ideas to make the best out of the work.


  1. 1.
    Haraway, D.: A game of cat’s cradle: science studies, feminist theory, cultural studies. Configurations 2(1), 59–71 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Puig de la Bellacasa, M.: Touching technologies, touching visions. The reclaiming of sensorial experience and the politics of speculative thinking. Subjectivity 28(1), 297–315 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tan, E.: Play the City. Jap Sam Books, Heijningen (2017)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Flanagan, M.: Critical Play: Radical Game Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogost, I.: Play Anything: The Pleasure of Limits, the Uses of Boredom, and the Secrets of Games. Basic Books, New York (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Walther, B.K.: Pervasive game spaces. Gameplay out in the open. In: Space, Time Play. Computer Games, Architecture and Urbanism: The Next Level, pp. 290–304. Birkhäuser, Basel (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nilsson, E.: Arkitekturens kroppslighet. Staden som terräng. Ph.D. thesis, Lund University, Lund, Sweden (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Haraway, D.: Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press, Durham (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mackenzie, A.: Transduction: intervention, innovation and collective life (2003). Accessed 12 May 2018
  10. 10.
    Stenros, J., Montola, M., Björk, S.: Designing temporal expansion. In: Pervasive Games, pp. 97–110. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lammes, S.: Digital cartographies as playful practices. In: Playful Identities: The Ludification of Digital Media Cultures, pp. 199–211. Amsterdam University Press (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Harley, J.B., Woodward, D.: The History of Cartography 1, xvi (1987)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ingold, T.: Lines: A Brief History. Routledge, Abingdon (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Augé, M.: Non-places an introduction to the anthropology of supermodernity. Verso, London/New York (1995)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bell, V.: Photo-image. In: Inventing Methods. The Happening of the Social, pp. 147–163. Paperback, London, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Listerborn, C.: Trygg stad: diskurser om kvinnors rädsla i forskning, policyveckling och lokal praktik. Chalmers tekniska högskola, Thesis. Chalmers tekniska högskola. Göteborg (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Montola, M., Stenros, J., Waern, A.: Designing spatial expansion. In: Pervasive Games, pp. 77–90. Morgan Kaufman, San Francisco (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Blekinge Institute of TechnologyKarlshamnSweden

Personalised recommendations