Advertisement

Effects of Vibrotactile Feedback in Commercial Virtual Reality Systems

  • Peter Weilgaard Brasen
  • Mathias Christoffersen
  • Martin KrausEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 265)

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of vibrotactile feedback by motion controllers of a commercial virtual reality (VR) system on immersion, actual and perceived user performance, and perceived difficulty of specific tasks in VR.

To this end, we developed two different tasks in VR with different types of interactions: entering numbers by rotating a number dial and stirring a pot. In a within-subject experiment, 14 participants completed the two tasks with and without vibrotactile feedback.

The results showed that for both tasks self-reported immersion was significantly improved by vibrotactile feedback, while perceived difficulty was significantly reduced for one task, and perceived performance was significantly increased for the other task. These results show that even the limited vibrotactile feedback by motion controllers of commercial VR systems is capable of significantly changing VR experiences.

Keywords

Virtual Reality Vibrotactile feedback 

References

  1. 1.
    Against Gravity: Rec Room. https://www.againstgrav.com/rec-room/. Accessed 13 Sept 2018
  2. 2.
    Choi, I., Ofek, E., Benko, H., Sinclair, M., Holz, C.: CLAW: a multifunctional handheld haptic controller for grasping, touching, and triggering in virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2018, pp. 654:1–654:13. ACM, New York (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174228
  3. 3.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence 7(3), 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Massie, T.H., Salisbury, J.K.: The PHANToM haptic interface: a device for probing virtual objects. In: Proceedings of the ASME Dynamic Systems and Control Division, pp. 295–301 (1994)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sallnäs, E.L., Rassmus-Gröhn, K., Sjöström, C.: Supporting presence in collaborative environments by haptic force feedback. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 7, 461–476 (2000).  https://doi.org/10.1145/365058.365086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Slater, M., Linakis, V., Usoh, M., Kooper, R., Street, G.: Immersion, presence, and performance in virtual environments: an experiment with tri-dimensional chess. In: ACM Virtual Reality Software and Technology (VRST), pp. 163–172 (1996)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stone, R.J.: Haptic feedback: a brief history from telepresence to virtual reality. In: Brewster, S., Murray-Smith, R. (eds.) Haptic HCI 2000. LNCS, vol. 2058, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2001).  https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-44589-7_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Strohmeier, P., Hornbæk, K.: Generating haptic textures with a vibrotactile actuator. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2017, pp. 4994–5005. ACM, New York (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025812
  9. 9.
    Wu, C.M., Hsu, C.W., Lee, T.K., Smith, S.: A virtual reality keyboard with realistic haptic feedback in a fully immersive virtual environment. Virtual Reality 21(1), 19–29 (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-016-0296-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Weilgaard Brasen
    • 1
  • Mathias Christoffersen
    • 1
  • Martin Kraus
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Aalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations