Advertisement

Abstract

The idea of 360 degree is not a new phenomenon in arts and media. It has its origins in the arts of the early 18th century and later the panoramic view in the field of photography and also in film was adapted. Groundbreaking technological progress has allowed for a new hype in 360 degree videos in recent years, including new possibilities of interaction. In this paper we will describe the current status of the ongoing project Cyberella which focuses on exploring filmmaking and narrating techniques for interactive 360 degree films. Our approach is divided into two steps. Firstly, existing interactive 360 degree videos are examined for their specific film language. A catalogue will summarize important results of the analysis, including research questions, as a basis for our film project. Our second step will comprise of our film project Cyberella, which is testing a variety of film styles to find new ways of filmmaking and defining design guidelines. In summary, this paper aims to contribute to the discussion of how storytelling in relation to traditional film language can or should be adapted in 360 degree interactive video context to formulate first design-issues for practical use.

Keywords

Interactive 360 degree video Virtual reality Film language Design guideline 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are thankful for the great support of the student project group that was significantly involved in the implementation of Cyberella: Lea Sophie Drees, Simone Koch and Tamara Tromsdorf.

References

  1. 1.
    Oettermann, S., Schneider, D.L.: The Panorama: History of a Mass Medium, vol. 2, pp. 22–33. Zone Books, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nedelcu, M.: Expanded image spaces. From panoramic image to virtual reality, through cinema. Close Up: Film Media Stud. 44 (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
  4. 4.
    Dolan, D., Parets, M.: Redefining the axiom of story: the VR and 360 video complex. Tech Crunch (2016)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Passmore, P.J., Glancy, M., Philpot, A., Fields, B.: 360 cinematic literacy: a case study. International Broadcasting Convention (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Monaco, J., Lindroth, D.: How to Read a Film: The World of Movies, Media, and Multimedia: Language, History, Theory. Oxford University Press, Cary (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elsaesser, T., Hagener, M.: Film Theory: An Introduction Through the Senses. Routledge, Abingdon (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stam, R.: Film Theory: An Introduction. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Manovich, L.: The Language of New Media. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alexander, B.: The New Digital Storytelling: Creating Narratives with New Media–Revised and Updated Edition. ABC-CLIO (2017)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sherman, W.R., Craig, A.B.: Understanding Virtual Reality: Interface, Application, and Design. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rodowick, D.N., Rodowick, D.N.: The Virtual Life of Film. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aylett, R., Louchart, S.: Towards a narrative theory of virtual reality. Virtual Reality 7(1), 2–9 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shafer, D.M., Carbonara, C.P., Korpi, M.F.: Exploring enjoyment of cinematic narratives in virtual reality: a comparison study. Int. J. Virtual Reality 18(1) (2018)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
  16. 16.
    Neumann, U., Pintaric, T., Rizzo, A.: Immersive panoramic video. In: Proceedings of the Eighth ACM International Conference on Multimedia, pp. 493–494. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Argyriou, L., Economou, D., Bouki, V., Doumanis, I.: Engaging immersive video consumers: challenges regarding 360-degree gamified video applications. In: International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing and Communications and 2016 International Symposium on Cyberspace and Security (IUCC-CSS), pp. 145–152. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ryan, M.L.: Narrative as Virtual Reality 2: Revisiting Immersion and Interactivity in Literature and Electronic Media. JHU Press, Baltimore (2015)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Crawford, C.: Chris Crawford on Interactive Storytelling. New Riders, San Francisco (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chambel, T., Chhaganlal, M.N., Neng, L.A.: Towards immersive interactive video through 360 hypervideo. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, p. 78. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Passmore, P.J., Glancy, M., Philpot, A., Fields, B.: 360 cinematic literacy: a case study. In: International Broadcasting Convention, September 2017Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berliner, T., Cohen, D.J.: The illusion of continuity: active perception and the classical editing system. J. Film Video 63(1), 44–63 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    PEARL, USA (2017)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Curtis, C., Eisenmann, D., El Guerrab, R., Stafford, S.: The making of pearl, a 360 degree Google spotlight story. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2016 Apply Hour, p. 8. ACM (2016)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    WELCOME TO ALEPPO, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Van der Haak, B., Parks, M., Castells, M.: The future of journalism: networked journalism. Int. J. Commun. 6, 16 (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    GONE, USA (2015)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    VR NOIR, USA/Australia (2016)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Pope, V.C., Dawes, R., Schweiger, F., Sheikh, A.: The geometry of storytelling: theatrical use of space for 360-degree videos and virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 4468–4478. ACM (2017)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of EducationWeingartenGermany

Personalised recommendations