Advertisement

Emergent Properties and Stability in Hierarchical Biosystems: There Is no Privileged Level of Causation

  • Gustavo M. SouzaEmail author
  • Marcelo N. do Amaral
Chapter

Abstract

The main question herein is about the extent that reductionist approach can reach higher-level explanation as well as predict behavior from lower level of systems organization when concerning stability. Starting from a theoretical discussion on the complex hierarchical organization of biological systems, we offer a variety of examples showing the interchanging between bottom-up and top-down events underlying the regulation of the system. Moreover, we discuss and illustrate with different examples, how system stability under externally changing conditions are reached from many strategies without a specific level of causation, highlighting the role of downward causation with upward causation. Finally, we would like to demonstrate that there should be no dogmas when it comes to causation in biological systems.

References

  1. Ahl V, Allen TFH (1996) Hierarchy theory. A vision, vocabulary, and epistemology. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Alabadí D, Oyama T, Yanovsky MJ, Harmon FG, Mas P, Kay SA (2001) Reciprocal regulation between TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 within the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Science 293:880–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alcocer-Cuarón C, Rivera AL, Castano VM (2014) Hierarchical structure of biological systems: a bioengineering approach. Bioengineered 5:73–79.  https://doi.org/10.4161/bioe.26570CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Amaral MN, Souza GM (2017) The challenge to translate OMICS data to whole plant physiology: the context matters. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.02146
  5. Anckar J, Sistonen L (2011) Regulation of HSF1 function in the heat stress response: implications in aging and disease. Annu Rev Biochem 80:1089–1115.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-biochem-060809-095203CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Baetu TM (2012) Emergence, therefore antireductionism? a critique of emergent antireductionism. Biol Philos 27:433–448.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-011-9290-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bechtel W (2007) Biological mechanisms: organized to maintain autonomy. In: Boogerd F, Bruggerman F, Hofmeyr JH, Westerhoff HV (eds) Systems biology: philosophical foundations, 1st edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 269–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bertolli SC, Mazzafera P, Souza GM (2014) Why is so difficult to identify a single indicator of water stress in plants? a proposal for a multivariate analysis to access emergent properties. Plant Biol 16:578–585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bich L, Mossio M, Ruiz-Mirazo K, Moreno A (2016) Biological regulation: controlling the system from within. Biol Philos 31:237–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Booch G (1994) Object oriented analysis and design with applications. Addison Wesley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Braga NS, Vitória AP, Souza GM, Barros CF, Freitas L (2016) Weak relationships between leaf phenology and isohydric and anisohydric behavior in lowland wet tropical forest trees. Biotropica 48(4):453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Camazine S, Deneubourg J-L, Franks NR, Sneyd J, Theraulaz G, Bonabeau E (2001) Self-organization in biological systems. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  13. Choi W, Hilleary R, Swanson SJ, Kim SH, Gilroy S (2016) Rapid, long-distance electrical and calcium signalling in plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol 67:287–307.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-arplant-043015-112130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cid C, Garcia-Descalzo L, Casado-Lafuente V, Amils R, Aguilera A (2010) Proteomic analysis of the response of an acidophilic strain of Chlamydomonas sp. (Chlorophyta) to natural metal-rich water. Proteomics 10:2026–2036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Corominas-Murtra B, Goñi J, Solé RV, Rodríguez-Caso C (2013) On the origins of hierarchy in complex networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:13316–13321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Csermely P (2006) Weak links. In: Stabilizers of complex systems from proteins to social networks. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  17. Crick F (1970) Central dogma of molecular biology. Nature 227:561–563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies PCW (2012) The epigenome and top-down causation. Interface Focus 2:42–48.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0070CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. De Loof A (2016) The cell’s self-generated “electrome”: the biophysical essence of the immaterial dimension of life? Commun Integr Biol 9(5):e1197446.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19420889.2016.1197446CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. de Marco A, Vigh L, Diamant S, Goloubinoff P (2005) Native folding of aggregation-prone recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli by osmolytes, plasmid- or benzyl alcohol-overexpressed molecular chaperones. Cell Stress Chaperones Winter 10(4):329–339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Deal RB, Henikoff JG, Henikoff S (2010) Genome-wide kinetics of nucleosome turnover determined by metabolic labeling of histones. Science 328(5982):1161–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dietz KJ, Jacquot JP, Harris G (2010) Hubs and bottlenecks in plant molecular signaling networks. New Phytol 188:919–938CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ellis GFR (2008) On the nature of causation in complex systems. Trans R Soc S Afr 63:69–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ellis GFR (2012) Top-down causation and emergence: some comments on mechanisms. Interface Focus 2(1):126–140.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0062CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gerspacher C, Scheuber U, Schiera G, Proia P, Gygax D, Di Liegro I (2009) The effect of cadmium on brain cells in culture. Int J Mol Med 24:311–318PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gopinath RK, You S-T, Chien K-Y et al (2014) The Hsp90-dependent proteome is conserved and enriched for hub proteins with high levels of protein–protein connectivity. Genome Biol Evol 6:2851–2865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gross F, Green S (2017) The Sum of the parts: large-scale modeling in systems biology. Philos Theor Pract Biol 9:10.  https://doi.org/10.3998/ptb.6959004.0009.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hassidim M, Yakir E, FradkinD H, Kron I, Keren N, Harir Y, Yerushalmi S, Green RM (2007) Mutations in CHLOROPLAST RNA BINDING provide evidence for the involvement of the chloroplast in the regulation of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Plant J 51:551–562CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Henikoff S, Shilatifard A (2011) Histone modification cause or cog? Trends Genet 27:295–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hillenmeyer ME, Fung E, Wildenhain J et al (2008) The chemical genomic portrait of yeast: uncovering a phenotype for all genes. Science 320:362–365.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150021CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Hodgkin AL, Huxley AF (1952) A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve. J Physiol 117:500–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jacob F, Perrin D, Sanchez C, Monod J, Edelstein S (1960) The operon: a group of genes with expression coordinated by an operator. C R Hebd Seances Acad Sci 250:1727–1729PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Jarosz D, Lindquist S (2010) Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science 330:1820–1824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jin B, Li Y, Robertson KD (2011) DNA Methylation superior or subordinate in the epigenetic hierarchy? Genes Cancer 2(6):607–617CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kauffman SA, Clayton P (2006) On emergence, agency, and organization. Biol Philos 21:501–521.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-005-9003-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kitano H (2002) System biology: a brief overview. Science 295:1662–1664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kohl P, Crampin EJ, Quinn TA, Noble D (2010) Systems biology: an approach. Clin Pharmacol Ther| 88(1):25–33.  https://doi.org/10.1038/clpt.2010.92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Korn R (1999) Biological organization—a new look at an old problem. Bioscience 49:51–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuppers BO (1994) Information and the origin of life. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Lachowiec J, Queitsch C, Kliebenstein DJ (2015) Molecular mechanisms governing differential robustness of development and environmental responses in plants. Ann Bot 117(5):795–809.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv151CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lehner B, Crombie C, Tischler J, Fortunato A, Fraser AG (2006) Systematic mapping of genetic interactions in Caenorhabditis elegans identifies common modifiers of diverse signaling pathways. Nat Genet 38:896–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lempe J, Lachowiec J, Sullivan AM, Queitsch C (2012) Molecular mechanisms of robustness in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 16:62–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Levy SF, Siegal ML (2008) Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Biol 6:e264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu SX, Knowles SM, Andronis C, Ong MS, Tobin EM (2009) CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL function synergistically in the circadian clock of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 150:834–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas M, Laplaze L, Bennett M (2011) Plant systems biology: network matters. Plant, Cell Environ 34:535–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lüttge U (2012) Modularity and emergence: biology’s challenge in understanding life. Plant Biol 14:865–871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McClung CR (2006) Plant circadian rhythms. Plant Cell 18:792–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. MacMahon JA, Phillips DL, Robinson JV, Schimpf DJ (1978) Levels of biological organization: an organism-centered approach. Bioscience 28:700–704CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McClellan AJ, Xia Y, Deutschbauer AM, Davis RW, Gerstein M, Frydman J (2007) Diverse cellular functions of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone uncovered using systems approaches. Cell 131:121–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Misteli T (2010) Higher-order genome organization in human disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2(8):a000794.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a000794CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. Møller AP, Swaddle JP (1997) Asymmetry, developmental stability and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  52. Nakamichi N, Kiba T, Henriques R, Mizuno T, Chua N-H, Sakakibara H (2010) PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS 9, 7, and 5 Are transcriptional repressors in the Arabidopsis circadian clock. Plant Cell 22(3):594–605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Noble D (2008a) Genes and causation. Philos Trans Royal Soc A 366:3001–3015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Noble D (2008b) The first systems biologist, and the future of physiology. Exp Physiol 93:16–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Noble D (2011) A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus 2(1):55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. Noble D (2012) A theory of biological relativity: no privileged level of causation. Interface Focus 2:55–64.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsfs.2011.0067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Nolte C, Staiger D (2015) RNA around the clock. Front Plant Sci 6:311.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00311CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Novikoff AB (1945) The concept of integrative levels and biology. Science 101:209–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Nusinow DA, Helfer A, Hamilton EE, King JJ, Imaizumi T, Schultz TF, Farre EM, Kay SA (2011) The ELF4-ELF3-LUX complex links the circadian clock to diurnal control of hypocotyl growth. Nature 475:398–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Pigliucci M (2001) Phenotypic plasticity: beyond nature and nurture. JHU Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  61. Pratt WB, Morishima Y, Peng H-M, Osawa Y (2010) Proposal for a role of the Hsp90/Hsp70-based chaperone machinery in making triage decisions when proteins undergo oxidative and toxic damage. Exp Biol Med 235:278–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Queitsch C, Sangster T, Lindquist S (2002) Hsp90 as a capacitor of phenotypic variation. Nature 417:618–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Ravasz E, Somera AL, Mongru DA, Oltvai ZN, Barabási AL (2002) Hierarchical organization of modularity in metabolic networks. Science 297:1551–1555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roederer JG (2005) Information and its role in nature. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  65. Rojdestvenski I, Cottam M, Youn-II P, Oquist G (1999) Robustness and time-scale hierarchy in biological systems. BioSystems 50:71–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Romanowski A, Yanovsky MJ (2015) Circadian rhythms and post-transcriptional regulation in higher plants. Front Plant Sci 6:437.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00437CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Rosen R (1970) Dynamical system theory in biology. Stability theory and its applications. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  68. Rutherford SL, Lindquist SL (1998) Hsp90 as a capacitor for morphological evolution. Nature 396:336–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sanchez SE, Kay SA (2016) The plant circadian clock: from a simple timekeeper to a complex developmental manager. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 8(12):a027748.  https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a027748CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Sandqvist A, Bjork JK, Akerfelt M, Chitikova Z, Grichine A, Vourc’h C, Jolly C, Salminen TA, Nymalm Y, Sistonen L (2009) Heterotrimerization of heat-shock factors 1 and 2 provides a transcriptional switch in response to distinct stimuli. Mol Biol Cell 20(5):1340–1347.  https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e08-08-0864CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Sangster TA, Bahrami A, Wilczek A et al (2007) Phenotypic diversity and altered environmental plasticity in Arabidopsis thaliana with reduced Hsp90 levels. PLoS ONE 2:e648.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000648CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  72. Saraiva GFR, Ferreira AS, Souza GM (2017) Osmotic stress decreases complexity underlying the electrophysiological dynamic in soybean. Plant Biol 19(5):702–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Sekimoto T, Oda T, Pozo FM et al (2010) The molecular chaperone Hsp90 regulates accumulation of DNA polymerase g at replication stalling sites in UV-irradiated cells. Mol Cell 37:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Seo PJ, Mas P (2014) Multiple layers of posttranslational regulation refine circadian clock activity in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schneider DC (1998) Applied scaling theory. In: Peterson DL, Parker VT (eds) Ecological scale: theory and applications, 1st edn. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 253–269Google Scholar
  76. Shapiro JA (2011) Evolution: a view from the 21st century. Pearson Education Inc, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharrock RA, Clack T (2002) Patterns of expression and normalized levels of the five Arabidopsis phytochromes. Plant Physiol 130:442–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sheth BP, Thaker VS (2014) Plant systems biology: insights, advances and challenges. Planta 240:33–54. 
 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-014-2059-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Souza GM, Lüttge U (2015) Stability as a phenomenon emergent from plasticity–complexity–diversity in eco-physiology. In: Lüttge U, Beyschlag W (eds) Progress in botany, 1st edn. Springer Science + Business Media, Berlim, pp 211–239Google Scholar
  80. Souza GM, Bertolli SC, Lüttge U (2016a) Hierarchy and information in a system approach to plant biology: explaining the irreducibility in plant ecophysiology. In: Lüttge U (ed) Progress in botany, 1st edn. Springer Science + Business Media, Berlim, pp 167–186Google Scholar
  81. Souza GM, Ferreira AS, Saraiva GFR, Toledo GRA (2017) Plant “electrome” can be pushed toward a self-organized critical state by external cues: evidences from a study with soybean seedlings subject to diferent environmental conditions. Plant Signal Behav 12(3):e1290040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Souza GM, Prado CHBA, Ribeiro RV, Barbosa JPRAD, Gonçalves NA, Habermann G (2016b) Toward a systemic plant physiology. Theor Exp Plant Physiol 28:341–346.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40626-016-0071-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Souza GM, Ribeiro RV, Prado CHBA, Damineli DSC, Sato AM, Oliveira MS (2009) Using network connectance and autonomy analyses to uncover patterns of photosynthetic responses in tropical woody species. Ecol Complex 6:15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stensløkken K-O, Ellefsen S, Larsen HK, Vaage J, Nilsson GE (2010) Expression of heat shock proteins in anoxic crucian carp (Carassius carassius): support for cold as a preparatory cue for anoxia. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 298:1499–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Suzuki MM, Bird A (2008) DNA methylation landscapes: provocative insights from epigenomics. Nat Rev Genet 9(6):465–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Taipale M, Jarosz D, Lindquist S (2010) HSP90 at the hub of protein homeostasis: emerging mechanistic insights. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11:515–528CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tardieu F, Simonneau T (1998) Variability among species of stomatal control under fluctuating soil water status and evaporative demand: Modeling isohydric and anisohydric behaviours. J Exp Bot 49:419–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Török Z, Crul T, Maresca B et al (2014) Plasma membranes as heat stress sensors: from lipid-controlled molecular switches to therapeutic applications. Biochim Biophys Acta 1838:1594–1618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2013.12.015CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tóth R, Kevei É, Hall A, Millar AJ, Nagy F, Kozma-Bognár L (2001) Circadian clock-regulated expression of phytochrome and cryptochrome genes in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 127:1607–1616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Vítolo HF, Souza GM, Silveira J (2012) Cross-scale multivariate analysis of physiological responses to high temperature in two tropical crops with C3 and C4 metabolism. Environ Exp Bot 80:54–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Von Bertalanffy L (1968) General system theory. George Braziller Publ, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  92. Waddington CH (1961) Genetic assimilation. Adv Gen 10:257–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wade PA (2001) Methyl CpG-binding proteins and transcriptional repression. BioEssays 23(12):1131–1137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Wegscheid B, Condon C, Hartmann RK (2006) Type A and B RNase P RNAs are interchangeable in vivo despite substantial biophysical differences. EMBO Rep 7:411–417PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  95. Whitacre JM (2012) Biological robustness: paradigms, mechanisms, and systems principles. Front Genet 3:67.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2012.00067CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. Yeyati PLL, Bancewicz RMM, Maule J, Van Heyningen V (2007) Hsp90 selectively modulates phenotype in vertebrate development. PLoS Genet 3:e43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Zhao R, Davey M, Hsu YC et al (2005) Navigating the chaperone network: an integrative map of physical and genetic interactions mediated by the hsp90 chaperone. Cell 120:715–727CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BotanyInstitute of Biology, Federal University of PelotasPelotasBrazil

Personalised recommendations