Advertisement

Field Emergence and Stabilization

  • Philipp Golka
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, Golka unpacks the remarkable amplitude of social impact investing in British social policy: from being virtually nonexistent in the early 2000s, the concept was a key ingredient of British social policy reform during the Brown and Cameron premierships, before losing importance with the 2016 “Brexit” referendum and change of government. Golka argues that this was due to two main developments: on the one hand, impact investing proponents gained support from parts of the voluntary sector as the “social enterprise” concept emerged. On the other hand, the emergence of a “Treasury view” forged by HM Treasury’s dominance in British social policy between 1997 and 2016 served as a key resonance space for the financialization as welfare frame among policymakers.

References

  1. Ball, S. J., & Exley, S. (2010). Making policy with ‘good ideas’: Policy networks and the ‘intellectuals’ of new labour. Journal of Education Policy, 25(2), 151–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chiapello, E. (2015). Financialisation of valuation. Human Studies, 38(1), 13–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiapello, E., & Godefroy, G. (2017). The dual function of judgment devices. Why does the plurality of market classifications matter? Historical Social Research, 42(1), 152–188.Google Scholar
  4. Davis, A., & Walsh, C. (2015). The role of the state in the financialisation of the UK economy. Political Studies, 64(3), 666–682.Google Scholar
  5. Deakin, N., & Parry, R. (2000). The treasury and social policy: The contest for control of welfare strategy. Basingstoke: Macmillan Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dobrowolsky, A., & Lister, R. (2008). Social investment: The discourse and the dimensions of change. In M. Powell (Ed.), Modernising the welfare state: The Blair legacy. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dowling, E., & Harvie, D. (2014). Harnessing the social: State, crisis and (big) society. Sociology, 48(5), 869–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Finn, M. (2015). The coming of the coalition and the coalition agreement. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The coalition effect, 2010–2015 (pp. 31–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fligstein, N., & McAdam, D. (2012). A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, D. (1989). From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation of urban governance in late capitalism. Geografiska Annaler, 71(B), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kendall, J. (2000). The mainstreaming of the third sector into public policy in England in the late 1990s: Whys and wherefores. Policy & Politics, 28(4), 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Larsen, T. P., Taylor-Gooby, P., & Kananen, J. (2006). New labour’s policy style: A mix of policy approaches. Journal of Social Policy, 35(4), 629–649.Google Scholar
  14. Lee, S. (2008). Best for Britain? The politics and leagcy of Gordon Brown. Oxford: Oneworld Books.Google Scholar
  15. Lewis, J. (2005). New labour’s approach to the voluntary sector: Independence and the meaning of partnership. Social Policy and Society, 4(02), 121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lister, R. (1998). From equality to social inclusion: New labour and the welfare state. Critical Social Policy, 18(2), 215–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacMillan, R. (2010). The third sector delivering public services: An evidence review. Working Paper. Birmingham: University of Birmingham.Google Scholar
  18. Mader, P. (2015). The political economy of microfinance: Financialising poverty. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.Google Scholar
  21. McCann, E. (2013). Policy boosterism, policy mobilities, and the extrospective city. Urban Geography, 34(1), 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mulderrig, J. (2011). The grammar of governance. Critical Discourse Studies, 8(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  23. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., & Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: What it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Oxford: Oxford University Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  24. Newman, J. (2001). Modernising governance: New labour, policy, and society. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Riddel, P. (2015). The coalition and the executive. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The coalition effect, 2010–2015 (pp. 113–136). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Seldon, A. (Ed.). (2007). Blair’s Britain, 1997–2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Seldon, A. (2015). David Cameron as prime minister, 2010–2015: The verdict of history. In A. Seldon & M. Finn (Eds.), The coalition effect, 2010–2015 (pp. 1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Teasdale, S. (2011). What’s in a name? Making sense of social enterprise discourses. Public Policy and Administration, 27(2), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.Google Scholar
  31. Walsh, C. (2013). Financialization and UK chancellor rhetoric, 1976–2013. (PhD), London: Goldsmiths, University of London.Google Scholar
  32. Wiggan, J. (2017). Selling financialised welfare futures: The social impact investment market and the policy boostering discourse of UK Governments. Paper presented at the Social Finance, Impact Investing and the Financialisation of the Public Interest Conference, Hamburg, Germany.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philipp Golka
    • 1
  1. 1.Sociology of Markets, Organizations and GovernanceFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations