Advertisement

Towards More Inclusive Urban Governance

  • Ninik SuhartiniEmail author
  • Paul Jones
Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

This concluding chapter summarizes the main research findings and their relation to the broader discourse on urban governance in developing countries as discussed in the literature, plus their contribution to theory development and policy implications. This chapter revisits the main areas of inquiry and findings for each key theme, namely, (1) the types, processes and stakeholders that constitute formal urban governance in the provision of basic urban services; (2) who and how the stakeholders gain and benefit ‘on the ground’ from formal urban governance in basic urban service provision; and (3) how individuals, groups and communities who do not benefit directly from formal urban governance, organize and access governance to meet their basic urban service needs. What emerges is the fundamental role of urban governance in urban management and service provision and the reality that no ‘one size’ governance arrangement fits all. Most importantly, the melting pot of factors and variables influencing the effectiveness of governance reinforces the fundamental need for nuanced and contextual understanding of governance especially within informal settlements and, arguably, a better appreciation of who makes and shapes the wider city. Therefore, by better understanding, the workings of the city ‘as it is’ will hopefully result in better urban governance and outcomes for not just some, but all city residents.

Keywords

Inclusive Governance equilibrium Fixed elements Variable elements Contextual Self-organized 

References

  1. Alexander C (1965) City is not a tree. Architectural Forum 122(1):58–62 (Part I), 122(2):58–62 (Part II)Google Scholar
  2. Boeninger E, Nelson JM, Lateef KS (1991) Governance and development: issues and constraints; Comments; Floor discussion. The World Bank Res Observer 267Google Scholar
  3. Devas N (2004) Urban governance, voice and poverty in the developing world. Earthscan Publications, Sterling, VA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Dovey K (2012) Informal urbanizm and complex adaptive assemblage. Int Dev Plann Rev 34(4):349–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain: from knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  6. Hendriks F (2014) Understanding good urban governance: essentials, shifts, and values. Urban Aff Rev 50(4):553–576.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087413511782CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Heylighen F (2010) Self-organization of complex, intelligent systems: an action ontology for transdisciplinary integration. Integr Rev. http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/Papers/ECCO-paradigm.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2017
  8. Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosyst 4(5):390–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jacobs J (1961) The death and life of great American cities. Random House, New York BookGoogle Scholar
  10. Jones P (2016a) Unpacking informal urbanizm. Penerbit ITB, BandungGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones P (2016b) The emergence of Pacific urban villages: urbanization trends in the Pacific Islands. Asian Development BankGoogle Scholar
  12. Jouve B (2008) Urban governance: towards the emergence of a new policy instrument? Int Soc Sci J 59(193–194):343–357.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2451.2009.01671.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Obeng-Odoom F (2012a) The challenge of third world development. Capital & Class 36(1):194–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Obeng-Odoom F (2012b) On the origin, meaning, and evaluation of urban governance. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift—Norw J Geogr 66(4):204–212.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00291951.2012.707989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Roy A (2011) Urbanism, wording practices and the theory of planning. Plann Theor 10(1):6–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Silva P (2016) Tactical urbanizm: towards an evolutionary cities’ approach? Environ Plann B: Plann Des 43(6):1040–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516657340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Stoker G (1998) Governance as theory: five propositions. Int Soc Sci J 50(1):17–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Watson V (2009) Seeing from the South: refocusing urban planning on the globe’s central urban issues. Urban Stud 46(11):2259–2275.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009342598CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture, Planning and Policy DevelopmentInstitut Teknologi BandungBandungIndonesia
  2. 2.School of Architecture, Design and PlanningThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations