Advertisement

Ion-Exchange Chromatography in Separation and Purification of Beverages

  • Muhammad Razeen Ahmad
  • Muhammad Rizwan Javed
  • Muhammad Ibrahim
  • Arfaa Sajid
  • Muhammad Riaz
  • Ijaz Rasul
  • Muhammad Hussnain Siddique
  • Saima Muzammil
  • Muhammad Amjad Ali
  • Habibullah NadeemEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Beverage industries including water treatment industry, employ ion-exchange chromatography in different forms in several processes to remove chemicals, ions, additives, colourants or harmful substances from drinks. The ion-exchange materials employed are nonreactive and physiochemically stable, and therefore, are a suitable choice for beverage treatment. The most widespread use of ion-exchange process is in the water treatment industry; seawater and brackish water desalination, water softening, removal of heavy metals, harmful ions and dissolved organic contaminants. The ion-exchange chromatography used in these industrial processes is the courtesy of the processes: electrodialysis and electrodeionization, both of which use ion-exchange membranes and the latter use ion-exchange resins also. Excessive organic acids are removed from acidic fruit juices and wine using the same ion-exchange techniques. Electrodialysis and electrodeionization, along with their modifications and combination with other membrane filtration techniques, prove to be the most efficient in beverage treatment for best quality control.

References

  1. 1.
    Zagorodni AA (2006) Ion exchange materials: properties and applications. Elsevier, AmsterdamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ghaffour N, Bundschuh J, Mahmoudi H, Goosen MF (2015) Renewable energy-driven desalination technologies: a comprehensive review on challenges and potential applications of integrated systems. Desalination 356:94–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zheng X-Y, Pan S-Y, Tseng P-C, Zheng H-L, Chiang P-C (2018) Optimization of resin wafer electrodeionization for brackish water desalination. Sep Purif Technol 194:346–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Alvarado L, Chen A (2014) Electrodeionization: principles, strategies and applications. Electrochim Acta 132:583–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lopez AM, Williams M, Paiva M, Demydov D, Do TD, Fairey JL, Lin YJ, Hestekin JA (2017) Potential of electrodialytic techniques in brackish desalination and recovery of industrial process water for reuse. Desalination 409:108–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Voutchkov N (2018) Energy use for membrane seawater desalination—current status and trends. Desalination 431:2–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Strathmann H (2010) Electrodialysis, a mature technology with a multitude of new applications. Desalination 264(3):268–288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Singh R, Hankins N (2016) Emerging membrane technology for sustainable water treatment. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Etzel JE, Wachinski (1997) AM environmental ion exchange: principles and design. In: IWA leading-edge conference on water and wastewater treatment technologies. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton, FloridaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Arar Ö, Yüksel Ü, Kabay N, Yüksel M (2014) Demineralization of geothermal water reverse osmosis (RO) permeate by electrodeionization (EDI) with mixed bed configuration. Desalination 342:23–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pan S-Y, Snyder SW, Ma H-W, Lin YJ, Chiang P-C (2017) Development of a resin wafer electrodeionization process for impaired water desalination with high energy efficiency and productivity. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5(4):2942–2948CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pan S-Y, Snyder SW, Ma H-W, Lin YJ, Chiang P-C (2018) Energy-efficient resin wafer electrodeionization for impaired water reclamation. J Clean Prod 174:1464–1474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jacob C (2007) Seawater desalination: boron removal by ion exchange technology. Desalination 205(1–3):47–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bellizzi V, DeNicola L, Minutolo R, Russo D, Cianciaruso B, Andreucci M, Conte G, Andreucci V (1999) Effects of water hardness on urinary risk factors for kidney stones in patients with idiopathic nephrolithiasis. Nephron 81(Suppl. 1):66–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yildiz E, Nuhoglu A, Keskinler B, Akay G, Farizoglu B (2003) Water softening in a crossflow membrane reactor. Desalination 159(2):139–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Indarawis KA, Boyer TH (2013) Superposition of anion and cation exchange for removal of natural water ions. Sep Purif Technol 118:112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seo S-J, Jeon H, Lee JK, Kim G-Y, Park D, Nojima H, Lee J, Moon S-H (2010) Investigation on removal of hardness ions by capacitive deionization (CDI) for water softening applications. Water Res 44(7):2267–2275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Gobbo LC, Imamura F, Wu JH, de Oliveira Otto MC, Chiuve SE, Mozaffarian D (2013) Circulating and dietary magnesium and risk of cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies–. Am J Clin Nutr 98(1):160–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tang SC, Birnhack L, Cohen Y, Lahav O (2018) Selective separation of divalent ions from seawater using an integrated ion-exchange/nanofiltration approach. Chem Eng Processing ProcessGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Entezari MH, Tahmasbi M (2009) Water softening by combination of ultrasound and ion exchange. Ultrason Sonochem 16(3):356–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xue Z, Li Z, Ma J, Bai X, Kang Y, Hao W, Li R (2014) Effective removal of Mg2+ and Ca2+ ions by mesoporous LTA zeolite. Desalination 341:10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Costa M, Klein CB (2006) Toxicity and carcinogenicity of chromium compounds in humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 36(2):155–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alvarado L, Ramírez A, Rodríguez-Torres I (2009) Cr (VI) removal by continuous electrodeionization: study of its basic technologies. Desalination 249(1):423–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Alvarado L, Torres IR, Chen A (2013) Integration of ion exchange and electrodeionization as a new approach for the continuous treatment of hexavalent chromium wastewater. Sep Purif Technol 105:55–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Morales KH, Ryan L, Kuo T-L, Wu M-M, Chen C-J (2000) Risk of internal cancers from arsenic in drinking water. Environ Health Perspect 108(7):655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Basha CA, Selvi SJ, Ramasamy E, Chellammal S (2008) Removal of arsenic and sulphate from the copper smelting industrial effluent. Chem Eng J 141(1–3):89–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yeon K-H, Song J-H, Moon S-H (2004) A study on stack configuration of continuous electrodeionization for removal of heavy metal ions from the primary coolant of a nuclear power plant. Water Res 38(7):1911–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Souilah O, Akretche D, Amara M (2004) Water reuse of an industrial effluent by means of electrodeionisation. Desalination 167:49–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smara A, Delimi R, Chainet E, Sandeaux J (2007) Removal of heavy metals from diluted mixtures by a hybrid ion-exchange/electrodialysis process. Sep Purif Technol 57(1):103–110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dermentzis K, Christoforidis A, Valsamidou E (2011) Removal of nickel, copper, zinc and chromium from synthetic and industrial wastewater by electrocoagulation. Int J Environ Sci 1(5):697Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dermentzis K (2010) Removal of nickel from electroplating rinse waters using electrostatic shielding electrodialysis/electrodeionization. J Hazard Mater 173(1–3):647–652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dermentzis K, Davidis A, Dermentzi A, Chatzichristou C (2010) An electrostatic shielding-based coupled electrodialysis/electrodeionization process for removal of cobalt ions from aqueous solutions. Water Sci Technol 62(8):1947–1953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Spiegel E, Thompson P, Helden D, Doan H, Gaspar D, Zanapalidou H (1999) Investigation of an electrodeionization system for the removal of low concentrations of ammonium ions. Desalination 123(1):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Alharati A, Swesi Y, Fiaty K, Charcosset C (2017) Boron removal in water using a hybrid membrane process of ion exchange resin and microfiltration without continuous resin addition. J Water Process Eng 17:32–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wen R, Deng S, Zhang Y (2005) The removal of silicon and boron from ultra-pure water by electrodeionization. Desalination 181(1–3):153–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    El Midaoui A, Elhannouni F, Taky M, Chay L, Sahli MAM, Echihabi L, Hafsi M (2002) Optimization of nitrate removal operation from ground water by electrodialysis. Sep Purif Technol 29(3):235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sillanpää M, Ncibi MC, Matilainen A, Vepsäläinen M (2018) Removal of natural organic matter in drinking water treatment by coagulation: a comprehensive review. Chemosphere 190:54–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Levchuk I, Márquez JJR, Sillanpää M (2017) Removal of natural organic matter (NOM) from water by ion exchange—a review. ChemosphereGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Apell JN, Boyer TH (2010) Combined ion exchange treatment for removal of dissolved organic matter and hardness. Water Res 44(8):2419–2430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Comstock SE, Boyer TH (2014) Combined magnetic ion exchange and cation exchange for removal of DOC and hardness. Chem Eng J 241:366–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bhattacharjee C, Saxena V, Dutta S (2017) Fruit juice processing using membrane technology: a review. Innovative Food Sci Emerg Technol 43:136–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vera E, Sandeaux J, Persin F, Pourcelly G, Dornier M, Ruales J (2007) Deacidification of clarified tropical fruit juices by electrodialysis. Part I. Influence of operating conditions on the process performances. J Food Eng 78(4):1427–1438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Vera E, Sandeaux J, Persin F, Pourcelly G, Dornier M, Piombo G, Ruales J (2007) Deacidification of clarified tropical fruit juices by electrodialysis. Part II. Characteristics of the deacidified juices. J Food Eng 78(4):1439–1445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kang YJ, Rhee KC (2002) Deacidification of mandarin orange juice by electrodialysis combined with ultrafiltration. Nutraceuticals Food 7(4):411–416Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Vera E, Ruales J, Dornier M, Sandeaux J, Persin F, Pourcelly G, Vaillant F, Reynes M (2003) Comparison of different methods for deacidification of clarified passion fruit juice. J Food Eng 59(4):361–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Vera E, Ruales J, Dornier M, Sandeaux J, Sandeaux R, Pourcelly G (2003) Deacidification of clarified passion fruit juice using different configurations of electrodialysis. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 78(8):918–925CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Vera E, Sandeaux J, Persin F, Pourcelly G, Dornier M, Ruales J (2009) Deacidification of passion fruit juice by electrodialysis with bipolar membrane after different pretreatments. J Food Eng 90(1):67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Rozoy E, Boudesocque L, Bazinet L (2015) Deacidification of cranberry juice by electrodialysis with bipolar membranes. J Agric Food Chem 63(2):642–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Serre E, Rozoy E, Pedneault K, Lacour S, Bazinet L (2016) Deacidification of cranberry juice by electrodialysis: impact of membrane types and configurations on acid migration and juice physicochemical characteristics. Sep Purif Technol 163:228–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mangindaan D, Khoiruddin K, Wenten I (2017) Beverage dealcoholization processes: past, present, and future. Trends Food Sci TechnolGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ibeas V, Correia AC, Jordão AM (2015) Wine tartrate stabilization by different levels of cation exchange resin treatments: impact on chemical composition, phenolic profile and organoleptic properties of red wines. Food Res Int 69:364–372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Lasanta C, Caro I, Pérez L (2013) The influence of cation exchange treatment on the final characteristics of red wines. Food Chem 138(2–3):1072–1078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Palacios V, Caro I, Pérez L (2001) Application of ion exchange techniques to industrial process of metal ions removal from wine. Adsorption 7(2):131–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sarmento M, Oliveira J, Slatner M, Boulton R (1999) Kinetics of the adsorption of bovine serum albumin contained in a model wine solution by non-swelling ion-exchange resins. J Food Eng 39(1):65–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Muhammad Razeen Ahmad
    • 1
  • Muhammad Rizwan Javed
    • 1
  • Muhammad Ibrahim
    • 2
  • Arfaa Sajid
    • 3
  • Muhammad Riaz
    • 4
  • Ijaz Rasul
    • 1
  • Muhammad Hussnain Siddique
    • 1
  • Saima Muzammil
    • 5
  • Muhammad Amjad Ali
    • 6
  • Habibullah Nadeem
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Bioinformatics and BiotechnologyGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Applied ChemistryGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of ChemistryUniversity of LahoreLahorePakistan
  4. 4.Department of Food SciencesUniversity College of Agriculture, BahauddinZakariya UniversityMultanPakistan
  5. 5.Department of MicrobiologyGovernment College UniversityFaisalabadPakistan
  6. 6.Department of Plant PathologyCenter of Agricultural Biochemistry and Biotechnology (CABB), University of AgricultureFaisalabadPakistan

Personalised recommendations