Neogeography: Rethinking Participatory Mapping and Place-Based Learning in the Age of the Geoweb

  • Jon CorbettEmail author
  • Gabrielle Legault
Part of the Advances in Geographic Information Science book series (AGIS)


The term neogeography describes a new approach within GIScience teaching and research whereby geospatial technologies are becoming web-based and increasingly accessible to a broad range of developers and users. Through engaging with the geoweb (geospatial web-based applications), users are creating maps and sharing spatial data that is relevant to their own lives and experiences. The development of geoweb tools has been especially important for students and faculty members who engage in the practice of participatory mapping. In this chapter we describe how, in a university taught neogeography course, undergraduate students created participatory geoweb applications to address local issues. One student constructed a geoweb-based platform for civic dialogue; a second team of students designed and deployed an application to address the logistical challenges faced by a local grassroots organization. We draw on the pedagogic theory of place-based education (PBE) and consider it as an effective approach to teaching and learning neogeography. We observed how a PBE approach empowered students to critically and effectively engage in civic matters, become more invested in ‘place’ and actively learn directly about social justice issues. The approach also supported an increased academic engagement while providing a valuable learning experience in terms of developing technical, critical thinking and other soft skills.


Neogeography Geoweb Place-based education Participatory mapping 



The authors would like to thank Andrew Barton, author of the Places and Pipelines project, as well as Travis Eek, Stevie Frew, Liz Waterfield and Alex Rutledge, the creators of the Okanagan Fruit Tree Project web map. We would also like to acknowledge Casey Hamilton and Ailsa Beischer from the Okanagan Fruit Tree Project for their input, ideas and support of the geoweb project. Finally we would like to thank Nick Blackwell, the head Geolive programmer, and Joanne Carey, the Centre for Social, Spatial and Economic Justice administrator.


  1. Bowers, A. (2008). Why a critical pedagogy of place is an oxymoron. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 325–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brown, G., & Raymond, C. M. (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Corbett, J. (2009). Good practices in participatory mapping. Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.Google Scholar
  4. Coulson, M. R. C. (1977). Political truth and the graphic image. The Canadian Cartographer, 14(2), 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Craig, W. J., & Elwood, S. (1998). How and why community groups use maps and geographic information. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems, 25(2), 95–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Crutcher, M., & Zook, M. (2009). Placemarks and waterlines: Racialized cyberscapes in post-Katrina Google Earth. Geoforum, 40(4), 523–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dorling, D. (1998). Human cartography: When it is good to map. Environment and Planning A, 30, 277–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elfer, C. A. (2011). Place-based education: A review of historical precedents in theory and practice. PhD dissertation, University of Georgia, Athens.Google Scholar
  9. Elwood, S. (2002). GIS use in community planning: A multidimensional analysis of empowerment. Environment and Planning A, 34(5), 905–922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elwood, S. (2008). Volunteered geographic information: Key questions, concepts and methods to guide emerging research and practice. GeoJournal, 72(3–4), 133–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Elwood, S., & Ghose, R. (2001). PPGIS in community development planning: Framing the organizational context. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 38(3), 19–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Elwood, S., & Leszczynski, A. (2011). Privacy, reconsidered: New representations, data practices, and the geoweb. Geoforum, 42(1), 6–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elwood, S., Schuurman, N., & Wilson, M. (2011). Critical GIS. In The Sage handbook of GIS and society (pp. 87–106). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Freire, P. (1996). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  15. Ghose, R. (2007). Politics of scale and networks of association in public participation GIS. Environment and Planning A, 39(8), 1961–1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goodchild, M. F. (2007). Citizens as sensors: The world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal, 69(4), 211–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gruenewald, D. A. (2003). Foundations of place: A multidisciplinary framework for place-conscious education. American Educational Research Journal, 40(3), 619–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gruenewald, D. A. (2005). Accountability and collaboration: Institutional barriers and strategic pathways for place-based education. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8(3), 261–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Haklay, M., Singleton, A., & Parker, C. (2008). Web mapping 2.0: The neogeography of the Geoweb. Geography Compass, 2(6), 2011–2039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hall, G. B., Chipeniuk, R., Feick, R. D., Leahy, M. G., & Deparday, V. (2010). Community-based production of geographic information using open source software and Web 2.0. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(5), 761–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harley, J. B. (1989). Deconstructing the map. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 26(2), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jankowski, P. (2011). Designing public participation geographic information systems. In T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, & R. McMaster (Eds.), The Sage handbook of GIS and society (p. 347). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  23. Jeffery, C. (2014, November 5). More hungry mouths to feed this year in the Okanagan. Kelowna Now. Available from: 5 November 2014.
  24. Johnson, P. A., & Sieber, R. E. (2011). Motivations driving government adoption of the geoweb. GeoJournal, 1–14.Google Scholar
  25. Keen, A. (2007). The cult of the amateur: How blogs, MySpace, YouTube, and the rest of today’s user-generated media are destroying our economy, our culture, and our values. New York: Broadway Business.Google Scholar
  26. Kienberger, S. (2014). Participatory mapping of flood hazard risk in Munamicua, District of Búzi, Mozambique. Journal of Maps, 1–7.Google Scholar
  27. Kingston, R. (2011). Online public participation GIS for spatial planning. In T. Nyerges, H. Couclelis, & R. McMaster (Eds.), The Sage handbook of GIS and society (p. 361). London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kwan, M. P. (2002). Feminist visualization: re-envisioning GIS as a method in feminist geographic research. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 92(4), 645–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laituri, M. (2003). The issue of access: An assessment guide for evaluating public participation geographic information science case studies. Urisa Journal, 15(2), 25–32.Google Scholar
  30. Leitner, H., McMaster, R. B., Elwood, S., McMaster, S., & Sheppard, E. (2002). Models for making GIS available to community organizations: Dimensions of difference and appropriateness. In W. Craig, T. Harris, & D. Weiner (Eds.), Community participation and geographic information systems (pp. 37–52). London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  31. Lewthwaite, B. (2007). From school to community-based school: The influence of an aboriginal principal on culture-based school development. Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy, (64), 1–18.Google Scholar
  32. Livingstone, D. (1992). The geographers tradition. Oxford: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  33. Macintyre, B. (2008, March 14). Whatever next: A map of Utopia – Thanks to the internet we are living in a golden age of cartography. Times of London.Google Scholar
  34. McCall, K., Martínez, J. A., & Verplanke J. J. (2014). Shifting boundaries of volunteered geographic information systems and modalities: learning from PGIS. ACME: An International E–journal for Critical Geographies: Open Access, 36.Google Scholar
  35. McInerney, P., Smyth, J., & Down, B. (2011). ‘Coming to a place near you?’ The politics and possibilities of a critical pedagogy of place-based education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(1), 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Michaels, K. (2014). Close up: Kelowna farm to table movement flourishing. Kelowna Capital News. Available from: 4 November 2014.
  37. Panek, J. (2014). How participatory mapping can drive community empowerment--a case study of Koffiekraal, South Africa. South African Geographical Journal (ahead-of-print), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, B. (2006). Constructing community through maps? Power and praxis in community mapping. The Professional Geographer, 58(4), 470–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Poole, P. (1995). Geomatics, who needs it? Cultural Survival Quarterly, 18, 1–77.Google Scholar
  40. Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 35(4), 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rambaldi, G., Chambers, R., McCall, M., & Fox, J. (2006). Practical ethics for PGIS practitioners, facilitators, technology intermediaries and researchers. Participatory Learning and Action, 54(1), 106–113.Google Scholar
  42. Scharl, A., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The geospatial web: How geobrowsers, social software and the web 2.0 are shaping the network society. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlottmann, C. (2005). Introduction: Place-based and environmental education. Ethics, Place & Environment, 8(3), 257–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Semken, S., & Freeman, C. B. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 1042–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sieber, R. E. (2006). Public participation geographic information systems: A literature review and framework. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 96(3), 491–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sieber, R. E. (2007). Spatial data access by the grassroots. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 34(1), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, G. A. (2007). Place-based education: Breaking through the constraining regularities of public school. Environmental Education Research, 13(2), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stephens, M. (2013). Gender and the GeoWeb: Divisions in the production of user-generated cartographic information. GeoJournal, 78(6), 981–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sui, D., & DeLyser, D. (2012). Crossing the qualitative-quantitative chasm I Hybrid geographies, the spatial turn, and volunteered geographic information (VGI). Progress in Human Geography, 36(1), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sui, D. Z., & Holt, J. B. (2008). Visualizing and analysing public-health data using value-by-area cartograms: Toward a new synthetic framework. Cartographica, 43(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Tuan, Y.-F. (1990). Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perceptions, Attitudes, and Values. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tulloch, D. (2008). Is VGI participation? From vernal pools to video games. GeoJournal, 72, 161–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Turner, A. (2006). Introduction to neogeography. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Warf, B., & Sui, D. (2010). From GIS to neogeography: Ontological implications and theories of truth. Annals of GIS, 16(4), 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wood, D. (1992). The power of maps. New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Community, Culture and Global Studies, UBC OkanaganKelownaCanada

Personalised recommendations