The Impact of Brexit on the European Parliament: The Role of British MEPs in Euro-Mediterranean Affairs

  • Jan Claudius VölkelEmail author
Part of the European Administrative Governance book series (EAGOV)


Many of the aspects around Brexit have been related to policies between Europe and the Middle East/North Africa. The nightmarish collapse of Arab societies and security structures, especially in Syria, Iraq, Libya and Yemen, and the resulting 100,000s refugees fleeing towards Europe reawakened intensive debates about immigration, Islamisation and terrorism in the UK, embedded in the long-term dispute about what competences the EU should generally have.

The cleavages within Britain’s society between “remainers” and “leavers” also reverberated among UK’s 73 members of the European Parliament (UK-MEPs). Brexit supporters promoted fundamentally different ideas about the growing challenges in the EU’s southern neighbourhood than those who supported Britain’s EU membership. UK-MEPs were particularly disunited about whether borders for refugees should be opened or closed, whether Muslims posed a threat or enrichment for Europe’s societies, and whether closer cooperation in EU justice and home affairs led to higher or lower security.

With the means of a discourse analysis, this chapter analyses the contributions UK-MEPs have made to EU-Mediterranean policies during their last tenure in the European Parliament, 2014–2019. It shows that Brexiters used Mediterranean issues primarily as just another occasion to renew their criticism of the EU, calling for a leave from Brussels; Remainers, meanwhile, continued to dispute about the right European responses, and tried to shape EU policies as much as possible according to their political priorities.


European Parliament Brexit Middle East and North Africa Migration EU enlargement Euro-Mediterranean relations 



This work was supported by a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Individual Fellowship of the European Commission [grant number 706113].


  1. Applebaum, A. (2017). Britain After Brexit: A Transformed Political Landscape. Journal of Democracy, 28(1), 53–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brack, N. (2015). The Roles of Eurosceptic Members of the European Parliament and Their Implications for the EU. International Political Science Review, 36(3), 337–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. de la Baume, M. (2018, June 4). Populist Plan for 2019 Election Puts EU in Crosshairs. Politico. (9 August 2018).
  4. Fawcett, L. (2017). States and Sovereignty in the Middle East: Myths and Realities. International Affairs, 93(4), 937–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Gürkan, S. (2018). The Role of the European Parliament in Turkey-EU Relations: A Troublemaker or a Useful Normative Actor? Southeast European and Black Sea Studies.
  6. Hickey, S. (2017, September 4). Conservative MEP Among New Recipients of Irish Passport. The Irish Times. (29 March 2018).
  7. Hix, S. (2015a, December 17). British MEPs Lose Most Often in the European Parliament. LSE Blog. (1 August 2018).
  8. Hix, S. (2015b, December 17). How Often Do UK MEPs Get Their Way? The Guardian. (20 March 2018).
  9. Hix, S. (2016, January 20). The Policy Successes (and failures) of British MEPs. LSE Blog. (1 August 2018).
  10. Hix, S. (2018). Brexit: Where Is the EU–UK Relationship Heading? Journal of Common Market Studies, online first, 1–17.
  11. Hix, S., & Benedetto, G. (2016a, February 4). Do UK MEPs Get Key Positions of Power in Europe? The Guardian. (21 March 2018).
  12. Hix, S, & Benedetto, G. (2016b, February 5). Do British MEPs Win Key Positions of Power in the European Parliament? LSE Blog. (1 August 2018).
  13. Hix, S., Hagemann, S., & Frantescu, D. (2016, April 19). Would Brexit Matter? The UK’s Voting Record in the Council and the European Parliament. VoteWatch Europe. (2 August 2018).
  14. Hix, S., Noury, A., & Roland, G. (2018). The Changing Battle Lines in the European Parliament. In N. F. Campos & J.-E. Sturm (Eds.), Bretton Woods, Brussels, and Beyond: Redesigning the Institutions of Europe (pp. 51–60). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  15. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2018). Turkey’s EU Accession as a Factor in the 2016 Brexit Referendum. Turkish Studies, 19(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lynch, P., & Whitaker, R. (2016). Continuing Fault Lines and New Threats: European Integration and the Rise of UKIP. In G. Peele & J. Francis (Eds.), David Cameron and Conservative Renewal: The Limits of Modernization? (pp. 121–138). Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  17. McDonnell, D., & Werner, A. (2018). Respectable Radicals: Why Some Radical Right Parties in the European Parliament Forsake Policy Congruence. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(5), 747–763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milevska, T. (2013, December 21). UK No Longer Advocates for EU Enlargement. Euractiv. (18 March 2018).
  19. Norris, P. (2018, July). Understanding Brexit: Cultural Resentment Versus Economic Grievances. Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Paper 18–021. (2 August 2018).
  20. Shapiro, J. (2016, June 20). British MP Jo Cox’s Murder Brought Civility to the Brexit Debate. It Won’t Last. Vox. (18 March 2018).
  21. Stewart, H., & Mason, R. (2016, June 16). Nigel Farage’s Anti-Migrant Poster Reported to Police. The Guardian.
  22. Swinford, S. (2016, September 27). Boris Johnson Says Britain Will Now Help Turkey Join EU Despite Using Prospect to Help Win Referendum. The Telegraph. (18 March 2018).
  23. Taggart, P., & Szczerbiak, A. (2018). Putting Brexit Into Perspective: The Effect of the Eurozone and Migration Crises and Brexit on Euroscepticism in European States. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(8), 1194–1214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Völkel, J. C. (2017). When Interior Ministers Play Diplomats: Fatal Ambiguities in Europe’s Securitised Migration Policy. In A. Jünemann, N. Fromm, & N. Scherer (Eds.), Fortress Europe? Challenges and Failures of Migration and Asylum Policies (pp. 83–103). Wiesbaden: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. VoteWatch Europe. (2016, September 12). Top 10 Most Influential UK’s MEPs (September 2016). (13 May 2018).
  26. VoteWatch Europe. (2017, July 4). This Is Why the EU Lacks a Position on the Middle East Crisis. (27 March 2018).
  27. Whitaker, R., Hix, S., & Zapryanova, G. (2017a). Understanding Members of the European Parliament: Four Waves of the European Parliament Research Group MEP Survey. European Union Politics, 18(3), 491–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Whitaker, R., Hix, S., & Dreyer, P. (2017b, February 22). MEPs’ Attitudes in the 2014–19 European Parliament: Key Findings from the European Parliament Research Group’s Survey. MEP Survey Data. (1 August 2018).
  29. Yinanç, B. (2013, November 19). By Abandoning Conservatives AKP Helps Anti-Turkey Bloc in EU. Hürriyet Daily News. (27 March 2018).

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for European StudiesVrije Universiteit Brussel (IES-VUB)BrusselsBelgium

Personalised recommendations