Advertisement

Shape Casting pp 201-213 | Cite as

A Solidification Model with Application to AlSi-Based Alloys

  • Adrian V. CatalinaEmail author
  • Liping Xue
  • Charles A. Monroe
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

The behavior of a cast component under service conditions depends primarily on its local microstructural features, such as the amount and morphology of phases and chemical compounds precipitating during the solidification process. Therefore, developing a good understanding between the influencing factors (chemical composition of the alloy and cooling conditions) and the solidification path is of great importance for establishing the casting process conducive to desired results. Because the solidification path of commercial AlSi-based alloys is quite complex, predictive capabilities for this type of alloys have been developed and incorporated into the commercial casting simulation software FLOW-3D® CAST. Models for quantitative description of the precipitation reactions, their temperature range, precipitation rate of phases and compounds, as well as the secondary dendrite arm spacing in relation to the chemical composition and cooling conditions are presented in this chapter. Comparisons of predicted microstructure with experimental measurements on a test casting are also discussed.

Keywords

AlSi alloys Mathematical modeling Precipitation reactions Microstructure Quantitative prediction 

References

  1. 1.
    Drossel G (1981) Der Einflusse von Schmelzebehandlungen auf die Dichtheit von Gusskoerpern aus Al-Si-Gusslegierungen. Giessereitechnik 27(1):7–12Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mondolfo LF (1979) Aluminum alloys: structure and properties. Butterworth (Publishers) Inc., BostonGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tenekedjiev N, Mulazimoglu H, Closset B, Gruzleski J (1995) Microstructures and thermal analysis of strontium-treated aluminum-silicon alloys. American Foundrymen’s Society, Inc., Des Plaines, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Djurdjevic MB, Kierkus WT, Byczynski GE, Sokolowski JH (1998) Calculation of liquidus temperature for Aluminum 3XX series of alloys. AFS Trans, 143–147Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hernandez FCR, Djurdjevic MB, Kierkus WT, Sokolowski JH (2005) Calculation of the liquidus temperature for hypo and hypereutectic aluminum silicon alloys. Mat Sci Eng A 396:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Djurdjevic MB, Vicario I (2013) Description of hypoeutectic Al-Si-Cu alloys based on their known chemical compositions. Revista de Metalurgia 49(5):340–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Catalina AV, Leon-Torres JF, Stefanescu DM, Johnson ML (2007) Prediction of shrinkage-related defects in steel castings. In: Proceedings of the 5th decenial international conference solidification processes, Sheffield, pp. 699–703Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sigworth GK (2014) Fundamentals of solidification in aluminum castings. Intl J Metalcast 8(1):7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rappaz M, Boettinger WJ (1999) On dendritic solidification of multicomponent alloys with unequal liquid diffusion coefficients. Acta Mater 47(11):3205–3219Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Du Y, Chang YA, Huang B, Gong W, Jin Z, Xu H, Yuan Z, Liu Y, He Y, Xie F-Y (2003) Diffusion coefficients of some solutes in fcc and liquid Al: critical evaluation and correlation. Mat Sci Eng A363:140–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chintalapati P (2009) Solidification under pressure of aluminum castings. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Alabama at BirminghamGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chintalapati PP, Griffin JA, Griffin RD (2007) Improved mechanical properties of lost foam cast A356 and A319 aluminum solidified under pressure. AFS Transactions, 881–897Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kurz W, Fisher DJ (1992) Fundamentals of solidification. Trans Tech Pub Ltd, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian V. Catalina
    • 1
    Email author
  • Liping Xue
    • 1
  • Charles A. Monroe
    • 2
  1. 1.Flow Science, Inc.Santa FeUSA
  2. 2.The University of Alabama at BirminghamBirminghamUSA

Personalised recommendations