Shape Casting pp 125-130 | Cite as
Ti Grain Refinement Myth and Cleanliness of A356 Melt
Abstract
Grain refinement of cast alloys provides several advantages such as establishment of finer dendritic structure, lowered porosity due to increased feeding, and thereby higher mechanical properties are reached. For Al–Si alloys, Ti is the preferred; however, Ti has the tendency to sink to the bottom of the crucible due to density difference. In this work, this phenomenon was used to evaluate the correlation of Ti nucleation on bifilms and thereby sedimenting the defects to clean the melt. Primary and secondary A356 alloys were used. After grain refinement addition, samples were collected every 10 min to investigate the change in melt quality. Sand and die moulds were used. Tensile samples were produced for mechanical characterisation. Step mould was used to check the microstructural changes. Reduced pressure test was used to quantify melt cleanliness. It was found that melt quality was increased by duration. Mechanical properties were increased regardless of the microstructure.
Keywords
Grain refinement Ti Melt quality Cleanliness BifilmReferences
- 1.Mohanty PS, Gruzleski JE (1995) Mechanism of grain refinement in aluminium. Acta Metall Mater 43(5):2001–2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Schaffer PL, Dahle AK (2005) Settling behaviour of different grain refiners in aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 413:373–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Limmaneevichitr C, Eidhed W (2003) Fading mechanism of grain refinement of aluminum–silicon alloy with Al–Ti–B grain refiners. Mater Sci Eng A 349(1–2):197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Dispinar D, Campbell J (2011) Porosity, hydrogen and bifilm content in Al alloy castings. Mater Sci Eng A 528(10–11):3860–3865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Dispinar D, Akhtar S, Nordmark A, Di Sabatino M, Arnberg L (2010) Degassing, hydrogen and porosity phenomena in A356. Mater Sci Eng A 527(16–17):3719–3725CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Campbell J (2003) Castings. ElsevierGoogle Scholar