Advertisement

Sustainability of Wellbeing: An Analysis of Resilience and Vulnerability Through Subjective Indicators

  • Maria Bachelet
  • Fabiola Riccardini
  • Filomena Maggino
Chapter
Part of the Social Indicators Research Series book series (SINS, volume 77)

Abstract

Many scholars have focused on how the concepts of vulnerability and resilience may be employed in the analysis of sustainability. Different approaches have been proposed, concerning different fields of application (from environmental to financial settings). While much of the existing literature on vulnerability and resilience is sector-specific, we propose a more holistic approach that allows the sustainability of human well-being to be analyzed as a whole. In particular we apply those concepts to BES (Benessere, Equo e Sostenibile) framework, where 12 domains are included. Moreover, while the majority of studies consider the vulnerability and resilience as aspects of the sustainability of a “system” (a society, a country, or even the whole planet), we focus on an individual dimension of well-being, considering the exposure to risk and the ability to recover of the single persons. We show how the proposed scheme lends itself to the use of both objective and subjective indicators of well-being. Finally, using Italian data provided by the National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), we propose an example of how to analyses the subjective aspects of wellbeing in terms of sustainability.

References

  1. Argyle, M. (1987). The Psychology of Happiness, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  2. Bradburn, N.M. (1969). The Structure of Psychological Wellbeing. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Diener, E. (1984). “Subjective Wellbeing” in Psychological Bullettin, 95.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E. (2006). Guidelines for National Indicators of SWB and Ill-Being, Applied Research in Quality of Life, No. 1, pp. 151–157.Google Scholar
  5. Diener E. & Emmons R.A. (1984). “The independence of positive and negative affect” in Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47 (5).Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E. & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). “Beyond money: Toward an economy of wellbeing” in Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5.Google Scholar
  7. Eurofound – European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (2005). First European Quality of Life Survey: Life satisfaction, happiness and sense of belonging. Google Scholar
  8. Frey and Stutzer (2002). The Economics of Happiness World Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1Google Scholar
  9. Gasper, D.R. (2004). Subjective And Objective Well-Being In Relation To Economic Inputs: Puzzles And Responses, WeD Working Paper 09.Google Scholar
  10. Giovannini, E., A. Morrone, T. Rondinella, L.L. Sabbadini (2012). “L’iniziativa CNEL- ISTAT per la misurazione del Benessere Equo e Sostenibile in Italia” in Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, n. 1, Il Mulino, Bologna.Google Scholar
  11. Nuvolati, G. (2002). Qualità della vita e indicatori sociali. Seminar held at the PhD degree programme “Scienza tecnologia e società”, Dipartimento di Sociologia e di Scienza Politica, Università della Calabria.Google Scholar
  12. OECD (2013), OECD Guidelines on Measuring SWB, OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-en
  13. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 57(6), 1069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stiglitz, J. E., A. Sen & J.-P. Fitoussi (Eds.) (2009). Report by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, Paris.Google Scholar
  15. Zapf, W. (1984), “Individuelle Wohlfahrt: Lebensbedingungen und Wahrgenommene Lebensqualität“, in W. Glatzer & W. Zapf (Eds.) Lebensqualität in der Bundesrepublik, Frankfurt a. M. – New York, Campus.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Bachelet
    • 1
  • Fabiola Riccardini
    • 2
  • Filomena Maggino
    • 3
  1. 1.Università degli Studi di Roma “Tor Vergata”RomeItaly
  2. 2.Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT)RomeItaly
  3. 3.Università degli Studi di Roma “La Sapienza”RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations