Advertisement

The Long-Term Effect of Economic Growth, Energy Innovation, Energy Use on Environmental Quality

  • Daniel Balsalobre-LorenteEmail author
  • Agustín Álvarez-Herranz
  • Muhammad Shahbaz
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

This study advances in the analysis of the relationship between economic growth and environmental degradation, and how innovation and energy use impact on per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, in 17 selected OECD countries with over the period spanning from 1990 to 2012. The empirical model is found in the empirical hypothesis of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) scheme. The econometric results reveal a complete significant relationship, where economic growth, renewable electricity use and innovation correct environmental pollution, while biomass consumption and fossil electricity consumption affect negatively environmental correction process. This study implements a novel methodology in the analysis of the relationship between per capita GHG emissions and selected auxiliary variables, through an interaction effect which moderates the relationship between energy variables and economic cycle over per capita greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Hence, this study also incorporates De Leeuw’s finite lags effect in auxiliary variables, in order to validate the long-run effect of these variables over per capita GHG emissions. Consequently, the results validate the positive role that regulatory energy policies, linked with energy innovation processes and the replacement of polluting sources, have on environmental correction. The outcomes of this study demonstrate that in the long run, renewable electricity consumption and energy innovation measures delay the technical obsolescence. These results enable certain strengthened conclusions that help to explain the interaction between energy regulation, economic growth and per capita GHG emissions, and how are necessary the adoption of regulations which reduce energy dependency and mitigate the negative effect of dirty energy sources on per capita GHG emissions.

Keywords

Economic growth Energy innovation EKC Energy use 

References

  1. 1.
    International Energy Outlook (2016) https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/pdf/0484(2016).pdf
  2. 2.
    Meadows D, Meadows D, Zahn E, Milling P (1972) The limits to Growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Grossman G, Krueger E (1991) Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper 3914Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Panayotou T (1993) Empirical test and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development. Working Paper 238, Technology and Environment Programme, International Labour Office, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selden T, Song D (1994) Environmental quality and development: is there a Kuznets curve for air pollution emissions? J Environ Econ Manage 27(2):147–162Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shafik N, Bandyopadhyay N (1992) Economic growth and environmental quality: time-series and cross-country evidence. World Bank Working Papers 904, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Arrow K, Bolin B, Costanza R, Dasgupta P, Folke C, Holling CS, Jansson BO, Levin S, Miler KG, Perrings C, Pimentel D (1995) Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment. Science 268:520–521Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dooley JJ (1998) Unintended consequences: energy R&D in a deregulated market. Energy Policy 26(7):547–555Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andreoni J, Levinson A (1998) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. NBER Working Papers 6739Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andreoni J, Levinson A (2001) The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve. J Public Econ 80:269–286Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Popp D, Newell RG, Jaffe AB (2002) Energy, the environment, and technological change. In Halland BH, Rosenberg N (eds) Handbook of the economics of innovation, vol IIGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aghion P, Hepburn C, Teytelboym A, Zenghelis D (2014) Path-dependency, innovation and the economics of climate change. In: Supporting paper for new climate economy. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment, London School of Economics and political Science, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Álvarez A, Balsalobre D, Cantos JM, Shahbaz M (2017) Energy innovations-GHG emissions nexus: fresh empirical evidence from OECD countries. Energy Policy 101:90–100Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Cantos JM (2015) Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(7):4881–4892Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Balsalobre D, Álvarez AP (2016) Economic growth and energy regulation in the environmental Kuznets curve. Environ Sci Pollut Res.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6773-3Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jaffe AB, Newell RG, Stavins RN (2005) A tale of two market failures: technology and environmental policy. Ecol Econ 54:164–174Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Balsalobre D, Shahbaz M (2016) Energy consumption and trade openness in the correction of GHG levels in Spain. Bull Energy Econ 4:310–322Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bang G (2010) Energy security and climate change concerns: triggers for energy policy change in the United States? Energ Policy 38:1645–1653Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lilliestam J, Ellenbeck S (2011) Energy security and renewable electricity trade—will Desertec make Europe vulnerable to the bioenergy weapon? Energy Policy 39:3380–3391Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ozturk I (2010) A literature survey on energy–growth nexus. Energy Policy 38:340–349Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Turner K, Hanley N (2011) Energy efficiency, rebounds and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Econ 33:709–720Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    UK Climate Change Committee (2008) Building a low carbon economy: the UKs contribution to tackling climate change. UK CCC, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wackernagel, M*, Onisto L, Bello P, Callejas A, López I, Méndez J, Suárez A, Suárez MA (1999) National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecol Econ 29:375–390Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kraft J, Kraft A (1978) On the relationship between energy and GNP. J Energy Develop 3:401–403Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dinda S (2004) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a survey. Ecol Econ 49(4):431–455Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prieur F (2009) The environmental Kuznets curve in a world of irreversibility. Econ Theor 40(1):57–90MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Torras M, Boyce J (1998) Income, inequality, and pollution: a reassessment of the environmental Kuznets curve. Ecol Econ 25:147–160Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Copeland BR, Taylor MS (2004) Trade, growth, and the environment. J Econ Lit 42(1):7–71Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hao Y, Chen H, Wei YM, Li YM (2016) The influence of climate change on CO2 (carbon dioxide) emissions: an empirical estimation based on Chinese provincial panel data. J Clean Prod 131:667–677Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Markandya A, Golub A, Pedrosa-Gallinato A (2006) Empirical analysis of national income and SO2 emissions in selected European countries. Environ Resource Econ 35:221–257Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bruvoll A, Fæhn T, Strøm B (2003) Quantifying central hypotheses on environmental Kuznets curves for a rich economy: a computable general equilibrium study. Scott J Polit Econ 50(2):149–173Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Balsalobre D, Álvarez A, Baños J (2016) La innovación y la sustitución energética como medidas de corrección medioambiental en países de la OCDE. Estudios de Economía Aplicada 34:235–260Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Grossman G, Krueger E (1995) Economic growth and the environment. Quart J Econ 110(2):353–377zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Moomaw W, Unruh G (1997) Are environmental Kuznets curves misleading us? The case of CO2 emissions. Environ Dev Econ 2:451–463Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Heyes A, Kapur S (2011) Regulatory attitudes and innovation in a model combining internal and external R&D. J Environ Econ Manage 61(3):327–340zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kumbaroglu GS (2003) Environmental taxation and economic effects: a computable general equilibrium analysis for Turkey. J Pol Model 25:795–810Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vehmas J (2005) Energy-related taxation as an environmental policy tool-the Finnish experience 1990–2003. Energy Policy 33:2175–2182Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Halicioglu F (2009) An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37:1156–1164Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Danish, Zhang B, Wang B, Wang Z (2017) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ang JB (2007) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35:4772–4778Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ewing BT, Sari R, Soyta U (2007) Disaggregate energy consumption and industrial output in the United States. Energy Policy 35:1274–1281Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Sari R, Soytas U (2007) The growth of income and energy consumption in six developing countries. Energy Policy 35:889–898Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Alper A, Oguz O (2016) The role of renewable energy consumption in economic growth: evidence from asymmetric causality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 60:953–959Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Shahbaz M, Zeshan M, Afza T (2012) Is energy consumption effective to spur economic growth in Pakistan?. New evidence from bounds test to level relationships and Granger causality tests. Econ Model 29:2310–2319Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Shahbaz M, Khraief N, Uddin GS, Ozturk I (2014) Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: a bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 34:325–336Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and Granger causality. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:2947–2953Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shahbaz M, Mutascu MP, Azim P (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 18:165–173Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Shahbaz M, Ozturk I, Afza T, Ali A (2013) Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve in a global economy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 25:494–502Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Shahbaz M, Sbia R, Hamdi H, Ozturk I (2014) Economic growth, electricity consumption, urbanization and environmental degradation relationship in United Arab Emirates. Ecol Ind 45:622–663Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shahbaz M, Solarin SA, Mahmood H, Arouri M (2013) Does financial development reduce CO2 emissions in Malaysian economy? A time series analysis. Econ Model 35:145–152Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Shahbaz M, Tiwari AK, Nasir M (2013) The effects of financial development, economic growth, coal consumption and trade openness on CO2 emissions in South Africa. Energy Policy 61:1452–1459Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Tugcu CT, Ozturk I, Aslan A (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and economic growth relationship revisited evidence from G7 countries. Energy Econ 34:1942–1950Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Payne JE (2010) On biomass energy consumption and real output in the US. Energy Sources Part B 6:47–52Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Payne JE (2010) Survey of the international evidence on the causal relationship between energy consumption and growth. J Econ Stud 37:53–95Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Payne JE (2010) A survey of the electricity consumption–growth literature. Appl Energy 87:723–731Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sadorsky P (2009) Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37:4021–4028Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sari R, Ewing BT, Soytas U (2008) The relationship between disaggregate energy consumption and industrial production in the United States: an ARDL approach. Energy Econ 30:2302–2313Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:173–185Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Ben Jebli M, Ben Youssef S (2015) Output, renewable and non-renewable energy consumption and international trade: evidence from a panel of 69 countries. Renew Energy 83:799–808Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ozcan B (2013) The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 62:1138–1147Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) Renewable energy consumption and economic growth: evidence from a panel of OECD countries. Energy Policy 38:656–660Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Apergis N, Payne JE (2010) Renewable energy consumption and growth in Eurasia. Energy Econ 32:1392–1397Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Apergis N, Payne JE (2011) The renewable energy consumption–growth nexus in Central America. Appl Energy 88:343–347Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Apergis N, Payne JE (2012) Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption growth nexus: evidence from a panel error correction model. Energy Economics 34:733–738Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Sadorsky P (2011) Trade and energy consumption in the Middle East. Energy Economics 33:739–749Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Sadorsky P (2012) Energy consumption, output and trade in South America. Energy Econ 34:476–488Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Menegaki AN (2011) Growth and renewable energy in Europe: a random effect model with evidence for neutrality hypothesis. Energy Consumption 33:257–263Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Payne JE (2009) On the dynamics of energy consumption and output in the US. Appl Energy 86:575–577Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    De Leeuw F (1962) The demand for capital goods by manufacturers: a study of quarterly time series. Econometrica 30(3):407–423Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Dechezleprêtre A (2011) Invention and transfer of climate change mitigation technologies: a global analysis. Rev Environ Econ Policy 5(1):109–130Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Popp D (2002) Induced innovation and energy prices. Am Econ Rev 92(1):160–180Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Popp D (2006) International innovation and diffusion of air pollution control technologies: The effects of NOX and SO2 regulation in the U.S., Japan, and Germany. J Environ Econ Manage 51(1):46–71zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    IEA (2016) https://www.iea.org/energyaccess/database/MaterialFlows.Net (2016) http://www.materialflows.net/.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Brown SPA, McDonough IK (2016) Using the environmental Kuznets curve to evaluate energy policy: some practical considerations. Energy Policy 98:453–458Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Zoundi Z (2017) CO2 emissions, renewable energy and the Environmental Kuznets Curve, a panel cointegration approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 72:1067–1075Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Baltagi B (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data, 4th edn. Wiley, ChichesterzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Begum RA, Sohag K, Syed Abdullah SM, Jaafar M (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41:594–601Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Levin M, Lin CF, Chu CS (2002) Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. J Econ 108:1–24MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Breitung J (2000) The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi B (ed) Nonstationary panels, panel cointegration, and dynamic panels, advances in econometrics, vol 15, pp 161–178Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Im KS, Pesaran MH, Shin Y (2003) Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. J Econ 115:53–74MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Choi I (2001) Unit root tests for panel data. J Int Money Finance 20:249–272Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    World Bank (2016) World development indicators. www.data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/world-development-indicator
  83. 83.
    United Nations Population Division (2016) UNPD. www.un.org/esa/population
  84. 84.
    Bruno M, Easterly W (1998) Inflation crises and long-run growth. J Monetary Econ 41:3–26Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Anwar S, Sun S (2011) Financial development, foreign investment and economic growth in Malaysia. J Asian Econ 22(4):335–342Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Lin C, Liscow ZD (2013) Endogeneity in the environmental Kuznets curve: an instrumental variables approach. Am J Agr Econ 95:268–274Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Aghion P, Howitt P (1992) A model of growth trough creative destruction. Econometrica 60(2):323–351zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Fisher-Vanden K, Jefferson G, Liu H, Tao Q (2004) What is driving China’s decline in energy intensity? Resour Energy Econ 26:77–97Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Smulders S, Bretschger L (2000) Explaining environmental Kuznets curves: how pollution induces policy and new technologies., (CenteR Discussion Paper, vol 2000-95). Macroeconomics, TilburgGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Saidi K, Hammami S (2015) The impact of energy consumption and CO2 emissions on economic growth: fresh evidence from dynamic simultaneous-equations models. Sustain Cities Soc 14:178–186Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I (2016) The investigation of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in the advanced economies: The role of energy prices. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:1622–1631Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Lau LC, Lee KT, Mohamed AR (2012) Global warming mitigation and renewable energy policy development from the Kyoto protocol to the Copenhagen accord—a comment. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 16:5280–5284Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Nejat P, Jomehzadeh F, Taheri MM et al (2015) A global review of energy consumption, CO2 emissions and policy in the residential sector (with an overview of the top ten CO2 emitting countries). Renew Sustain Energy Review 43:843–862Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenerg 90:202–208Google Scholar
  95. 95.
    Barbier EB, Burgess JC (2001) The economics of tropical deforestation. J Econ Surv 15(3):413–433Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Bildirici M (2013) Economic growth and biomass energy. Biomass Bioenergy 50:19–24Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bildirici M (2014) Relationship between biomass energy and economic growth in transition countries: panel ARDL approach GCB. Bioenergy 6:717–726Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Bildirici M, Ozaksoy F (2013) The relationship between economic growth and biomass energy consumption in some. Eur countries J Renew Sustain Energy 5:2Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Fischer G, Prieler S, van Velthuizen H, Lensink SM, Londo M, de Wit M (2010) Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures. Part I: land productivity potentials. Biomass Bioenerg 34:159–172Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Judson RA, Schmalensee R, Stoker TM (1999) Economic development and the structure of the demand for commercial energy. Energy J 20(2):29–57Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Ma C, Stern DI (2008) Biomass and China’s carbon emissions: a missing piece of carbon decomposition. Energy Policy 36(7):2517–2526Google Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ohler A, Fetters (2014) Fetters relationship between renewable electricity generation and GDP growth: a study of energy sources. Energy Econ 43:125–139Google Scholar
  103. 103.
    Payne JE (2011) On biomass energy consumption and real output in the U.S. Energy Sources Part B Econ Plan Policy 6:47–52MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Victor NM, Victor DG (2002) Macro patterns in the use of traditional biomass fuels. Working Paper Stanford, CA: program on energy and sustainable developmentGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Yildirim E, Sarac S, Aslan A (2012) Energy consumption and economic growth in the USA: evidence from renewable energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:6770–6774Google Scholar
  106. 106.
  107. 107.
    Yemane WR (2005) Energy demand and economic growth: the African experience. J Policy Model 27:891–903Google Scholar
  108. 108.
    Domaca J, Richardsb K, Risovicc S (2005) Socio-economic drivers in implementing bioenergy projects. Biomass Bioenerg 28:97–106Google Scholar
  109. 109.
    Loo SV, Koppejan J (2010) The handbook of biomass combustion and co-firing. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Reinhardt GA, von Falkenstein E (2011) Environmental assessment of biofuels for transport and the aspects of land use competition. Biomass Bioenerg 35:2315–2322Google Scholar
  111. 111.
    Khanna M, O’nal H, Dhungana B, Wander M (2011) Economics of herbaceous bioenergy crops for electricity generation: implications for greenhouse gas mitigation. Biomass Bioenerg 35:1474–1484Google Scholar
  112. 112.
    Rogers JG, Brammer JG (2012) Estimation of the production cost of fast pyrolysis bio-oil. Biomass Bioenerg 36:208–217Google Scholar
  113. 113.
    Grahn M, Azar C, Lindgren K, Berndes G, Gielen D (2007) Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies. Biomass Bioenerg 31:747–758Google Scholar
  114. 114.
    Sagar AD, Kartha S (2007) Bioenergy and sustainable development? Annu Rev Environ Resour 32:131–167Google Scholar
  115. 115.
    Berglund M, Borjesson P (2006) Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production. Biomass Bioenerg 30:254–266Google Scholar
  116. 116.
    Paine LK, Peterson TL, Undersander DJ, Rineer KC, Bartelt GA, Temple SA, Sample DW, Klemme RM (1996) Some ecological and socio-economic considerations for biomass energy crop production. Biomass Bioenerg 10(4):231–242Google Scholar
  117. 117.
    Radetzki M (1997) The economics of biomass in industrialized countries: an overview. Energy Policy 25(6):545–554Google Scholar
  118. 118.
    Hoekman SK (2009) Biofuels in the U.S.—challenges and opportunities. Renew Energy 34:14–22Google Scholar
  119. 119.
    Walter A (2006) Biofuels in developing countries and rapidly emerging economies–socio-economic and political aspects. In: Biofuels for transportation: global potential and implications for sustainable agriculture and energy, 16–17 May, Berlin, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Demirbas MF, Balat M, Balat H (2009) Potential contribution of biomass to the sustainable energy development. Energy Convers Manag 50:1746–1760Google Scholar
  121. 121.
    Bilgili F, Cak E, Bulut U (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 54:838–845Google Scholar
  122. 122.
    Stagl S (1999) Delinking economic growth from environmental degradation? A literature survey on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Working Paper no 6, working paper series of the research focus growth and employment in Europe: sustainability and competitiveness, Wirtschaftsuniversität WienGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Unruh GC, Moomaw WR (1998) An alternative analysis of apparent EKC-type transitions. Ecol Econ 25:221–229Google Scholar
  124. 124.
    IPCC (2011) Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: summary for policymakers and technical summary: special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate changeGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Kroetz KM, Friedland AJ (2008) Comparing costs and emissions of northern New England space heating fuel options. Biomass Bioenergy 32:1359–1366Google Scholar
  126. 126.
    Halkos G (2011) Environment and economic development: determinants of an EKC hypothesis. J Appl Econ Sci 2(16):148–159Google Scholar
  127. 127.
    OECD (2016) IEA energy technology RD&D statics. http://www.oecd.org/statics
  128. 128.
    Energy Information Administration (2015) International Energy Outlook. EIA, Washington, DC. Available from: www.eia.gov/forecasts/aeo
  129. 129.
    European Commission (2001) Directive 2001/77/EC on the promotion of electricity produced from renewable energy sources in the internal electricity market. OJ L283/33, 27 Oct 2001Google Scholar
  130. 130.
    European Commission (2008) Community Guidelines on state aid for environmental protection (2008/C 82/01)Google Scholar
  131. 131.
    International Energy Agency (2015). www.worldenergyoutlook.org
  132. 132.
    Jaffe AB, Palmer K (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: a panel data study. Rev Econ Stat 79:610–619Google Scholar
  133. 133.
    Kenny D (1979) Correlation and causality. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    OECD (2008) Organization for economic cooperation and development: promoting sustainable consumption: good practices in OECD countries. Paris, France. Available from: http://www.oecd.org/greengrowth/40317373.pdf
  135. 135.
    OECD (2016) Organization for economic cooperation and developmentGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Soytas U, Sari R, Ewing BT (2007) Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States. Ecol Econ 62:482–489Google Scholar
  137. 137.
    United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affair/ Population Division (2015) World Population prospects: The 2015 revision, key findings and advance tables. https://esa.un.org
  138. 138.
    United Nations Environment Program (2013a) e Energy policy network for the 21st century. In: es 2013: Global status report, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    United Nations Environment Program (2013b) Green economy and trade: trends, challenges and opportunities, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    World Bank (1992) Development and the environmental. Oxford University Press, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Balsalobre-Lorente
    • 1
    Email author
  • Agustín Álvarez-Herranz
    • 2
  • Muhammad Shahbaz
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Political Economy and Public Finance, Economic and Business Statistics and Economic PolicyUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCuencaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Spanish and International Economics, Econometrics and Economic History and InstitutionsUniversity of Castilla-La ManchaCuencaSpain
  3. 3.School of Management and EconomicsBeijing Institute of TechnologyBeijingChina
  4. 4.COMSATS University IslamabadLahore CampusLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations