Advertisement

Study on the Effect of Different CO2–O2 Mixture Gas Blowing Modes on Vanadium Oxidation

  • Zheng-Lei Guo
  • Yu WangEmail author
  • Qi Lu
  • Shu-Chao Wang
Conference paper
Part of the The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series book series (MMMS)

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of mixed blowing CO2–O2 gas on the extraction of vanadium and adopts blowing flow and stage blowing, two types of variables, to study the effect of both on the extraction of vanadium from hot iron. The initial blowing temperature of the experiment was set to 1300 °C. The experimental results showed that the whole process is sprayed with 15% CO2, and the optimum blowing flow rate is 1.714 L/(min kg). The stage blowing has better vanadium extraction with carbon retention effect, compared with the whole blowing of 10% CO2, and the end point temperature of the molten pool is decreased by 17 °C. The stage blowing is injecting 10% CO2 in the initial and injecting 15% CO2 in the middle and late period. And it has a higher vanadium oxidation rate than the whole blowing 10% CO2, which can reach 95.14%.

Keywords

Carbon dioxide Vanadium extraction Bath temperature 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (project No.51334001) and Sharing Found of Large Scale Equipment, Chongqing University (project No.201512150031).

References

  1. 1.
    Grimston MC, Karakoussis V, Fouquet R et al (2001) The European and global potential of carbon dioxide sequestration in tackling climate change. Clim Policy 1(2):155–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wang K, Wang C, Lu X et al (2007) Scenario analysis on CO2 emissions reduction potential in China’s iron and steel industry. Energy Policy 35(4):2320–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Olivier JGI, Peters JAHW, Janssens-Maenhout G (2013) Trends in global CO2 emissions. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment AgencyGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashimoto K, Habazaki H, Yamasaki M et al (2002) Advanced materials for global carbon dioxide recycling. Mater Sci Eng A 304(2):88–96Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brunsch R (1995) Technological ways to reduce the release of climatic-relevant emissions from the agricultural animal husbandry. Oekologische Hefte der Landwirtschaftlich-Gaertnerischen Fakultaet, Humboldt-Universitaet (Germany)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kuo SJ (1997) Adapting sustainable low-carbon technologies to reduce carbon dioxide emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Dissertation Abstr Int 58–02:0892Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    York APE, Xiao T, Green MLH et al (2007) Methane oxyforming for synthesis gas production. Cata Rev 49(4):511–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yun HH, Ruckenstein E (2002) Binary MgO—based solid solution catalysts for methane conversion to syngas. Cheminform 44(3):423–453Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradford MCJ (1999) Vannice M A. CO2 reforming of CH4. Catal Rev 41(1):1–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nomura H, Mori K (2010) Kinetics of decarburization of liquid iron with high concentration of carbon. Tetsu-to-Hagane 58(4):29–40Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Du WT, Wang Y, Wen G (2015) Effect of CO2–O2 mixed injection on C and V element oxidation in hot metal. J Chongqing Univ 38(05):66–72Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.College of Materials Science and EngineeringChongqing UniversityChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations