Slag Basicity: What Does It Mean?
The concept of “basicity” has been central to our understanding of slag chemistry for many decades. Traditionally, basicity has been connected to the level of networking present in a slag, acid slags having a great deal of networking and basic slag having less networking. Qualitatively, this approach provides quite reasonable explanations to the viscosity of slags, their general interaction with refractories and their ability to dissolve oxidised elements from the metal/matte phase. Various quantitative measures of basicity have been proposed, such as optical basicity and the NBO/T ratio, and there have some successful attempts to link these measurements to important properties. However, in general, these measures have not been successfully linked to common thermodynamic relationships (other than empirically) or direct measurements from the plant. In industry, weight ratio’s and empirical relationships dominate the control logic of the metallurgical processes. In this paper, we will review what is the current state of knowledge of “basicity”, recent research into connecting NBO/T ratios to quantitative measurements and thermodynamic quantities and propose a way forward towards a more rigorous and useful understanding of “basicity”.
KeywordsBasicity Slag chemistry Slag structure Slag properties
This paper is dedicated to the memory of the late Dr Andrew Ducret who patiently explained the fundamentals of slag chemistry to the first author of this paper between doing experiments, playing cards in the student common room and enjoying each other’s company at the University of Melbourne in 1990. We are also grateful to conversations with Mr Lesley Beyers from KU Leuven on these topics.
- 1.Thomas and Gilchrist (1929) Blockow and Vaughan 1879-1928. Vaughan & Co., Ltd., Middlesbrough, BlockowGoogle Scholar
- 2.Bodsworth C, Bell HB (1972) Physical chemistry of iron and steel manufacture. Longman, London, pp 66–89Google Scholar
- 3.Gilchrist JD (1989) Extraction metallurgy, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, London, pp 198–200Google Scholar
- 4.Oeters F (1989) Metallurgy of steelmaking. Berlin, Stahl & Eisen, p 3–14Google Scholar
- 5.Rosenqvist T (2004) Principles of extractive metallurgy. Tapir Academic Press, Trondheim, pp 295–320Google Scholar
- 6.Turkdogan E (1996) Fundamentals of steelmaking. Institute of Materials, London, pp 138–179Google Scholar
- 7.Laird BB, Chang R (2009) University Chemistry. McGraw-Hill, Boston, pp 556–610Google Scholar
- 8.Sherwood Taylor F (1976) The alchemists. Palladin, LondonGoogle Scholar
- 11.Lux H (1939) Acids and bases in a fused salt bath: the determination of oxygen-ion concentration. Z Elektrochem Soc 45:303–310Google Scholar
- 12.Flood H, Grojtherm K (1952) J Iron Steel Inst 171:64Google Scholar
- 13.Sommerville I, Sosinsky D (1994) Solubility, capacity and stability of species in metallurgical slags and glasses. Pyrometallurgy Complex Mater Wastes: p 73–91Google Scholar
- 16.Sommerville I, Sosinsky D. The application of the optical basicity concept to metallurgical slags. In: Proceedings in 2nd international symposium on metallurgical slags and fluxes. metallurgical society of the AIME, pp 1015–1026Google Scholar
- 31.Maroufi S et al (2016) Diffusion coefficients and structural parameters of molten slags. In: Advances in molten slags, fluxes, and salts: proceedings of the 10th international conference on molten slags, fluxes and salts 2016, SpringerGoogle Scholar
- 35.Shuva MAH (2017) Analysis of thermodynamics behaviour of valuable elements and slag structure during e-waste processing through copper smelting. Ph.D. thesis, Swinburne University of TechnologyGoogle Scholar