Drivers of Emotions in Airbnb-Reviews

  • Christian WeismayerEmail author
  • Ilona Pezenka
Conference paper


The sharing economy rapidly led to changes within the travel accommodation service industry over the last decade. Because of these changes, reviews are becoming more and more important. Reviews are particularly useful for peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms, as they reflect past experience from other customers and, in most cases, they are the only source of information available. Since customers take these reviews into consideration in their travel planning, understanding the composition of customer experience and feelings in the rating process is essential. Literature shows that there are different consequences of emotionality expressed in reviews. Thus, this paper explores the relationship between different lodging aspects and their roles in the formation of emotional content in reviews. This is achieved by exploring emotional expressions in reviews to reveal which criteria evoke which kind of emotions. In this way, a more precise customer sentiment understanding is derived. The findings provide a new angle on investigating customer behaviour.


Verbal emotion recognition Peer-to-peer (P2P) Sharing economy Review 


  1. 1.
    Lessig L (2008) Remix: making art and commerce thrive in the hybrid economy. PenguinGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Botsman R (2013) The sharing economy lacks a shared definition. Accessed 18 June 2018
  3. 3.
    Airbnb (2018a) Accessed 05 July 2018
  4. 4.
    Airbnb (2018b) Accessed 02 July 2018
  5. 5.
    Guttentag D (2015) Airbnb: disruptive innovation and the rise of an informal tourism accommodation sector. Curr Issues Tour 18(12):1192–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oskam J, Boswijk A (2016) Airbnb: the future of networked hospitality businesses. J Tour Futures 2(1):22–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tussyadiah IP (2015) An exploratory study on drivers and deterrents of collaborative consumption in travel. In: Tussyadiah I, Inversini A (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2015. Springer International Publishing, pp 817–830Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Edelman BG, Luca M (2014) Digital discrimination: the case of HBS Working Paper Number: 14-054. Harvard Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teubner T, Hawlitschek F, Dann D (2017) Price determinants on Airbnb: how reputation pays off in the sharing economy. J Self-Gov Manag Econ 5(4):53–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gretzel U, Yoo KH (2008) Use and impact of online travel reviews. In: O’Connor P, Höpken W, Gretzel U (eds) Information and communication technologies in tourism 2008. Springer International Publishing, pp 35–46Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kim J, Gupta P (2012) Emotional expressions in online user reviews: how they influence consumers’ product evaluations. J Bus Res 65(7):985–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ludwig S, de Ruyter K, Friedman M, Brüggen E, Wetzels M, Pfann G (2013) More than words: the influence of affective content and linguistic style matches in online reviews on conversion rates. J Mark 77(1):87–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yin D, Bond S, Zhang H (2014) Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Q 38(2):539–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bansal HS, Voyer PA (2000) Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. J Serv Res 3(2):166–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jalilvand MR, Samiei N (2012) The impact of electronic word of mouth on a tourism destination choice: testing the theory of planned behavior (TPB). Internet Res Electron Netw Appl Policy 22(5):591–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ye Q, Law R, Gu B, Chen W (2011) The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: an empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Comput Hum Behav 27(2):634–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Baka V (2016) The becoming of user-generated reviews: looking at the past to understand the future of managing reputation in the travel sector. Tour Manag 53:148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag Sci 49(10):1407–1424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Litvin SW, Goldsmith RE, Pan B (2008) Electronic word-of-mouth in hospitality and tourism management. Tour Manag 29(3):458–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cox C, Burgess S, Sellitto C, Buultjens J (2009) The role of user-generated content in tourists’ travel planning behavior. J Hosp Mark Manag 18(8):743–764Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vermeulen IE, Seegers D (2009) Tried and tested: the impact of online hotel reviews on consumer consideration. Tour Manag 30(1):123–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhao X, Wang L, Guo X, Law R (2015) The influence of online reviews to online hotel booking intentions. Int J Contemp Hosp Manag 27(6):1343–1364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Havitz ME, Dimanche F (1990) Propositions for testing the involvement construct in recreational and tourism contexts. Leis Sci 12(2):179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Olson K (2013) National study quantifies reality of the ‘Sharing Economy’ movement. Accessed 15 June 2018
  25. 25.
    Möhlmann M (2015) Collaborative Consumption: determinants of satisfaction and the likelihood of using a sharing economy option again. J Consum Behav 14(3):193–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ert E, Fleischer A, Magen N (2016) Trust and reputation in the sharing economy: the role of personal photos in Airbnb. Tour Manag 55:62–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dolnicar S (2017) Unique features of peer-to-peer accommodation networks. In: Dolnicar S (ed) Peer-to-peer accommodation networks: pushing the boundaries. Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford, pp 1–14.
  28. 28.
    Hrobath BA, Leisch F, Dolnicar S (2017) Drivers of price in city destinations: Vienna. In: Dolnicar S (ed) Peer-to-peer accommodation networks: pushing the boundaries. Goodfellow Publishers, Oxford, pp 137–147.–3610Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Zervas G, Proserpio D, Byers J (2015) A first look at online reputation on Airbnb, where every stay is above average. Accessed 28 June 2018
  30. 30.
    Dellarocas C, Wood CA (2008) The sound of silence in online feedback: estimating trading risks in the presence of reporting bias. Manag Sci 54(3):460–476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bolton G, Greiner B, Ockenfels A (2013) Engineering trust: reciprocity in the production of reputation information. Manag Sci 59(2):265–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Berger J, Milkman KL (2012) What makes online content viral? J Mark Res 49(2):192–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rice RE, Love G (1987) Electronic emotion: socioemotional content in a computer-mediated communication network. Commun Res 14(1):85–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, Gremler DD (2004) Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet? J Interact Mark 18(1):38–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Alick MD, Braun JC, Glor JE, Klotz KL, Magee J, Sederholm H, Siegel R (1992) Complaining behavior in social interactions. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 18(3):286–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yoo KH, Gretzel U (2008) What motivates consumers to write online travel reviews? Inf Technol Tour 10(4):283–295CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bronner F, De Hoog R (2011) Vacationers and eWOM: who posts, and why, where, and what? J Travel Res 50(1):15–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ho JY, Dempsey M (2010) Viral marketing: motivations to forward online content. J Bus Res 63(9–10):1000–1006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ullah R, Amblee N, Kim W, Lee H (2016) From valence to emotions: exploring the distribution of emotions in online product reviews. Decis Support Syst 81:41–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 25 June 2018
  41. 41.
    Inside Airbnb (2018a) Detailed review data for listings in Vienna [reviews.csv.gz]. Accessed 25 June 2018
  42. 42.
    Inside Airbnb (2018b) Detailed listings data for Vienna [listings.csv.gz]. Accessed 25 June 2018
  43. 43.
    Mohammad SM, Turney PD (2010) Emotions evoked by common words and phrases: using Mechanical Turk to create an emotion lexicon. In: Proceedings of the NAACL-HLT 2010 workshop on computational approaches to analysis and generation of emotion in text, LA, California, pp 26–34Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Mohammad SM, Turney PD (2013) Crowdsourcing a word-emotion association lexicon. Comput Intell 29(3):436–465. Scholar
  45. 45.
    Plutchik R (1962) The emotions: facts, theories and a new model. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Izard CE (1977) Human emotions. Plenum Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Russell JA, Mehrabian A (1977) Evidence for a three-factor-theory of emotions. J Res Pers 11:273–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ekman P (1992) Are there basic emotions? Psychol Rev 99:550–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Ekman P (1992) An argument for basic emotions. Cogn Emot 6:169–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Plutchik R (1997) Circumplex models of personality and emotions. American Psychological Association, Washington, DCCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Ortony A, Turner TJ (1990) What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychol Rev 97:315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Ooms J (2018) cld2: Google’s compact language detector 2. R package version 1.2. Accessed 25 June 2018
  53. 53.
    Gagolewski M (2018) R package stringi: character string processing facilities. Accessed 25 June 2018
  54. 54.
    Grün B, Hornik K (2011) Topicmodels: an R package for fitting topic models. J Stat Softw 40(13):1–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rinker TW (2018) Textstem: tools for stemming and lemmatizing text version 0.1.4. Buffalo, New York. Accessed 25 June 2018
  56. 56.
    Wild F (2015) lsa: Latent semantic analysis. R package version 0.73.1. Accessed 25 June 2018

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sustainability, Governance, and MethodsMODUL University ViennaViennaAustria
  2. 2.Department of CommunicationFHWien University of Applied Sciences of WKWViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations