Advertisement

Double Gender Gap in Tourism High-Technology Organisations: Results and Corporate Actions

  • Cristina Figueroa-DomecqEmail author
  • Jesus Palomo
  • Ma Dolores Flecha-Barrio
  • Mónica Segovia-Pérez
Conference paper

Abstract

The actuality of the double gender gap, that confirms the under-representation in both decision-making and technological positions, has been hardly analysed in the tourism industry. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to identify women’s position in top management positions in some of the most important tourism-high technological organisations and to evaluate these organisations’ actions towards the improvement of women’s participation. The analysis combines NASDAQ corporation data with content analysis on annual reports and corporate websites. Results confirm a low participation of women in NASDAQ tourism-technology board of director’s corporations and companies increasing steps towards women incorporation in decision making positions. Results show that though there are important disparities among organisations, there is a direct relationship between the implementation of specific programs to increase women’s participation in the organisation’s decisions and the percentage of women on Board of Directors, the highest decision-making level.

Keywords

Women Gender Technology Tourism Double gender gap discrimination Board of directors 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No WomENT DLV-792738.

References

  1. 1.
    Movono A, Dahles H (2017) Female empowerment and tourism: a focus on businesses in a Fijian village. Asia Pac J Tour Res 22(6):681–692.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10941665.2017.1308397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Costa C, Bakas FE, Breda Z, Durao M, Carvalho I, Cacador S (2017) Gender, flexibility and the ‘ideal tourism worker’. Ann Tour Res 64:64–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2017.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Figueroa-Domecq C, Pritchard A, Segovia-Pérez M, Morgan N, Villacé-Molinero T (2015) Tourism gender research: a critical accounting. Ann Tour Res 52:87–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2015.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ashcraft C, McLain B, Eger E (2016) Women in tech: the facts. National Centre for Women & Technology (NCWIT). https://www.ncwit.org/sites/default/files/resources/ncwit_women-in-it_2016-full-report_final-web06012016.pdf
  5. 5.
    Segovia-Pérez M, Figueroa-Domecq C Mercado-Idoeta, C (2012) Presente y futuro de la mujer directiva en puestos tecnológicos del sector turístico In A Guevara Plaza A Aguayo Maldonado, J L Caro Herrero A Cerezo Medina (eds) Turitec 2012: IX Congreso Nacional Turismo y Tecnologías de la Información y las Comunicaciones. Málaga: Universidad de Málaga 287–303Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Segovia-Pérez M, Figueroa-Domecq C, Fuentes-Moraleda L, Muñoz-Mazón A (2018) Incorporating a gender approach in the hospitality industry: Female executives’ perceptions. Int J Hosp Manag 76A:184–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.05.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wang MT, Degol JL (2017) Gender gap in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM): current knowledge, implications for practice, policy, and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 29(1):119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Teigen M (2012) Gender quotas on corporate boards: on the diffusion of a distinct national policy reform. In: Engelstad F, Teigen M (eds) Firms, boards and gender quotas: Comparative perspectives. Comparative Social Research, vol 29. Emerald, Bingley, UK, pp 115–146Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Robnik S (2015) Gender equality in decision-making positions–significance of transparent staffing. The Ministry of Labour Family Social A airs and Equal Opportunities Ljubljana. http://www.mddsz.gov.si/fileadmin/mddsz.gov.si/pageuploads/dokumenti__pdf/enake_moznosti/VkljuciVseRaziskavaTransparentnoKadrovanjeANG.pdf
  10. 10.
    Díaz-Fernández MC, González-Rodríguez MR, Simonetti B (2015) Top management team’s intellectual capital and firm performance. Eur Manag J 33(5):322–331.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
  12. 12.
    Hewlett SA, Luce CB, Servon LJ, Sherbin L, Shiller P, Sosnovich E, Sumberg K (2008) The Athena factor: Reversing the brain drain in science, engineering, and technology. Harv Bus Rev Res Rep 10094:1–100Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Doherty L, Guerrier Y, Jamieson S, Lashley C, Lockwood A (2001) Getting ahead: graduate careers in hospitality management. CHME/HEFCE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    García-Pozo A, Campos-Soria JA, Sánchez-Ollero JL, Marchante-Lara M (2012) The regional wage gap in the Spanish hospitality sector based on a gender perspective. Int J Hosp Manag 31(1):266–275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Muñoz-Bullón F (2009) The gap between male and female pay in the Spanish tourism industry. Tour Manag 30(5):638–649.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2008.11.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kinnaird V, Hall D (1996) Understanding tourism processes: a gender-aware framework. Tour Manag 17(2):95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ramos V, Rey-Maqueira J, Tugores M (2002) Analisis empírico de discriminacion por razon de género en una economía especializada en turismo. Annals of Tourism Research en Español 4(1):239–258Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sinclair MT (edit) (1997) Gender, work and tourism, Routledge, Nueva YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kelan EK (2007) Tools and toys: communicating gendered positions towards technology. Inf Commun Soc 10(3): 358–383.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180701409960,  https://doi.org/10.1016/0261-5177(95)00112-3
  20. 20.
    Soleymani S, Mosavi SY, Parirokh M (2012) The relationship between usage rate of information and communication technology by faculty members of Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, and motivation rate, updating of lesson content and attractiveness of classroom in academic year of 2008-2009. Iran J Inf Process Manag 27(3):737–758Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Koppi T, Sheard J, Naghdy F, Edwards SL, Brookes W (2010) Towards a gender inclusive information and communications technology curriculum: a perspective from graduates in the workforce. Comput Sci Educ 20(4):265–282.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2010.527686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wickramasinghe V (2009) Predictors of job satisfaction among IT graduates in offshore outsourced IT firms. Pers Rev 38(4):413–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Faulkner W (2001) The technology question in feminism: a view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Stud Int Forum 24(1):79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-5395(00)00166-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turkle S (2004) Computational reticence: Why women fear the intimate machine. In: Technology and women’s voices. Routledge, pp 44–60Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Fundación Telefónica (2017) La sociedad de la información en España 2017. https://www.fundaciontelefonica.com/arte_cultura/sociedad-de-la-informacion/sdie-2017/
  26. 26.
    Tajeddini K, Walle AH, Denisa M (2017) Enterprising women, tourism, and development: the case of Bali. Int J Hosp Tour Adm 18(2):195–218.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15256480.2016.1264906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cook A Glass, C (2014) Women and top leadership positions: towards an institutional analysis. Gend Work Organ 21(1):91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    González-Rodríguez MR, Díaz-Fernández MC, Simonetti B (2015) The social economic and environmental dimensions of corporate social responsibility: The role played by consumers and potential entrepreneurs. Int Bus Rev 24(5):836–848.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.03.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Adams RB (2016) Women on boards: the superheroes of tomorrow? Leadersh Q 27(3):371–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.11.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Jourová V (2016) Gender balance on corporate boards: Europe is cracking the glass ceiling. Fact sheets European Commission. file:///Users/cfigueroa/Downloads/WomenonBoards.pdfGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    European Commission (2016) Database on women and men in decision-makingGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Beattie V, McInnes W, Fearnley S (2004) A methodology for analysing and evaluating narratives in annual reports: a comprehensive descriptive profile and metrics for disclosure quality attributes. Account Forum 28(3):205–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2004.07.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Bonilla-Priego MJ, Font X, Del Rosario Pacheco-Olivares M (2014) Corporate sustainability reporting index and baseline data for the cruise industry. Tour Manag 44:149–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2014.03.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wallgren FM, Andersson P (2018) Board gender diversity and firm financial performance: a study of 100 companies listed on Nasdaq Stockholm. Master Thesis. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1206669/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Cristina Figueroa-Domecq
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jesus Palomo
    • 2
  • Ma Dolores Flecha-Barrio
    • 2
  • Mónica Segovia-Pérez
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Hospitality and Tourism ManagementUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  2. 2.Business Dpt, Rey Juan Carlos UniversityMóstolesSpain

Personalised recommendations