Understanding the Organization of Science

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
  • Michael Fast


The questions to ask to science are the following: What is the spirit of science? What are the assumptions and beliefs in science? What is the essence of science? Are all sciences alike? What is science in relation to humans, society, and everyday life? What is good science? To raise those questions means that we enter the discussions of philosophy and philosophy of science, e.g., the discussions of ontology and epistemology. First of all what should science do and what is the meaning of science? Kjørup (1987: 35) thinks that initially, one may say that the tasks of science are:


  1. Alvesson M. A critical framework for organisational analysis: Towards a critical organisation theory, Studies in the economics and organization of action, no. 19. Lund: University of Lund; 1983a.Google Scholar
  2. Alvesson M. Organisations teori och teknokratiskt medvetande. Stockholm: Natur och Kultur; 1983b.Google Scholar
  3. Alvesson M, Sköldberg K. Tolkning och reflektion – vetenskapsfilosofi och kvalitativ metod. Lund: Studenterlitteratur; 1994.Google Scholar
  4. Andersen H, editor. Videnskabsteori og metodelære, Bind 1 and 2. Gylling: Samfundslitteratur; 1990a.Google Scholar
  5. Andersson S. Känslornas filosofi. Brutus Östlings Bokförlag Symposion, Stockholm; 1992.Google Scholar
  6. Arbnor I, Bjerke B. Företagsekonomisk metodlära. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 1981.Google Scholar
  7. Arbnor I, Bjerke B. Methodology for creating business knowledge. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 1997.Google Scholar
  8. Arndt J. The political economy paradigm: foundation for theory building in marketing. J Mark. 1983;47:44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Astley WG, Van de Ven AH. Central perspectives and debates in organization theory. Adm Sci Q. 1983;28:245–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baran P, Sweezy PM. Monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press; 1966.Google Scholar
  11. Bärmark J. Världbild och vetenskapsideal. Några ledande temata hos Abraham Maslow (rap. nr. 84). Göteborgs Universitet; 1976.Google Scholar
  12. Bartunek JM. Changing interpretive schemes and organizational restructuring: the example of a religious order. Adm Sci Q. 1984;29:355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bengtsson J. Sammanflätningar – Husserls och Merleau-Pontys fenomenologi. Uddevalla: Daidalos; 1993.Google Scholar
  14. Benson JK. Organizations: a dialectical view. Adm Sci Q. 1977a;22:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Berger PL, Luckmann T. The social construction of reality – a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. New York: Doubleday & Company; 1966.Google Scholar
  16. Blau P. Structural effects. Am Sociol Rev. 1960;25(2):178–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Blumer H. Symbolic interaction – perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1969; 1986.Google Scholar
  18. Bradley MF. Nature and significance of international marketing: a review. J Bus Res. 1987;15:205–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bravermann B. Arbejde og monopolkapital – om arbejdets fornedrelse under kapitalismen. København: Demos; 1978.Google Scholar
  20. Brown RH. Bureaucracy as praxis: towards a political phenomenology of formal organizations. Adm Sci Q. 1978;23(3):365–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burrell G, Morgan G. Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heinemann; 1980.Google Scholar
  22. Cavusgil ST. Some observations on the relevance of critical variables for internationalization stages. In: Czinkota MR, Tesar G, editors. Export management: an international context. New York: Praeger; 1982.Google Scholar
  23. Cheng JLC. Organizational coordination, uncertainty, and performance: an integrative study. Hum Relat. 1984;37(10):829–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Child J. Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology. 1972;6(1):1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Comte, A.: “Om Positivismen” (“Discours préliminaire sur l´esprit positif”, 1844). Korpen, Göteborg, Sweden, 1991.Google Scholar
  26. Comtel, A, “On the three Stages of Social Evolution” In Parsons Tmf.l (eds).Google Scholar
  27. Cuff EC, Payne GCF. Samhällsvetenskapliga perspektiv. Uddevalla: Korpen; 1982.Google Scholar
  28. Daft RL. Organization theory and design. St. Paul: West Publishing Company; 1989.Google Scholar
  29. Delanty G. Social science. 2nd ed. Glasgow: Open University Press; 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Delanty G, Strydom P. Philosophies of social science – the classical and contemporary readings. Open University Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  31. Dunning JH. The eclectic paradigm of international production – an up-date and a reply to its critics. Discussion papers in international investment and business studies, no. 91. University of Reading; 1985.Google Scholar
  32. Eisenstadt SN, Curelaru M. The form of sociology – paradigms and crises. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1976.Google Scholar
  33. Fink A. Teori – Praksis. Positivistisk Hermeneutisk Kritisk – Videnskabsteori. Grenå: GMT; 1973.Google Scholar
  34. Flato I. Historie – nyere og nyeste tid. – Videnskabernes historie i det 20. århundrede. Haslev: Gyldendal; 1985.Google Scholar
  35. Flor JR. Vor tids filosofi. København: Politikkens forlag; 1982.Google Scholar
  36. French WL, Bell CH. Organization development: behavioral science interventions for organization improvement. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1984.Google Scholar
  37. Gadamer H-G. Truth and method. London: Sheed & Ward; 1993 (1975).Google Scholar
  38. Garfinkel H. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1967.Google Scholar
  39. Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday; 1959.Google Scholar
  40. Habermas J. The theory of communicative action, vol. 1 & 2. London: Heinemann; 1984.Google Scholar
  41. Harste G. Organisationskultur og Kulturel Livsverden – om institutioners kommunikative rationalisering: AUC, Institut for Kommunikation; 1988.Google Scholar
  42. Hedberg BLT, Nystrom PC, Starbuck WH. Camping on seesaws: prescriptions for a self-designing organization. Adm Sci Q. 1976;21:41–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Heilbroner R. The making of economic society: revised for the 1990s. London: Prentice-Hall International; 1989.Google Scholar
  44. Hennestad BW. Organizations: frameworks or frame work? Scand J Manag Stud. 1986.Google Scholar
  45. Heydebrand W. Organizational contradictions in public bureaucracies: towards a Marxian theory of organizations. In: Benson JK, editor. Organizational analysis – critique and innovation. Beverly Hills: SAGE; 1977.Google Scholar
  46. Heydebrand W. Organization and praxis. In: Morgan G, editor. Beyond method – strategies for social research. London: SAGE; 1983.Google Scholar
  47. Hofstede G. Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values. Beverly Hills: SAGE; 1980a.Google Scholar
  48. Hofstede G. Motivation, leadership, and organization: do American theories apply abroad? Organ Dyn. 1980b;9:42–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Imershein AW. Organizational change as a paradigm shift. In: Benson JK, editor. Organizational analysis – critique and innovation. London: SAGE; 1977.Google Scholar
  50. Ingebrigtsen S, Pettersson M. Marketing – en videnskabsteoretisk analyse. Et humanistisk alternativ. København: Samfundslitteratur; 1979.Google Scholar
  51. Johansson J, Mattsson L-G. Internationalisation in industrial systems – a network approach. Reprint series: Uppsala University; 1988/1.Google Scholar
  52. Kallinikos J. Bureaucracy and organizational culture: a dialectical view. Uppsala University, Working paper; 1986/1.Google Scholar
  53. Kallinikos J. Network as webs of signification. Uppsala University, Working paper; 1989/5.Google Scholar
  54. Kant I. Critique of pure reason (“Kritiken der reinen Vernunft” (1781/1787)). Hong Kong: Macmillan; 1929.Google Scholar
  55. Kjørup S. Forskning og Samfund – en grundbog i videnskabsteori. Haslev: Gyldendal; 1987.Google Scholar
  56. Knudsen C. Økonomisk metodologi – om videnskabsidealer, forklaringstyper og forskningstraditioner. Charlottenlund: Jurist- og Økonomiforbundets Forlag; 1991.Google Scholar
  57. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1970 (1962).Google Scholar
  58. Lübcke P (red.). Politikens filosofi leksikon – Filosofi. Aalborg: Politikens Forlag; 1994a.Google Scholar
  59. McGuire JB. A dialectical analysis of interorganizational networks. J Manag. 1988;14(1):109–24.Google Scholar
  60. Merleau-Ponty M. The phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1994 (1962).Google Scholar
  61. Morgan G. Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Adm Sci Q. 1980;25:605–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morgan G, editor. Beyond method – strategies for Social Research. Beverly Hills: SAGE; 1983.Google Scholar
  63. Morgan G. Images of organization. Beverly Hills: SAGE; 1986.Google Scholar
  64. Næss A. Filosofiens Historie, Bind 1. Viborg: Hans Reitzels forlag; 1991a.Google Scholar
  65. Neimark M, Tinker T. Identity and non-identity thinking: a dialectical critique of the transaction cost theory of the modern corporation. J Manag. 1987;13(4):661–73.Google Scholar
  66. Nelson RR. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Res Policy. 1990. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North Holland.Google Scholar
  67. Nerheim H, Rossvœr V. Filosofiens historie – fra Sokrates til Wittgenstein. Viborg: Politikens Forlag; 1990.Google Scholar
  68. Nietzsche F. Den glada vetenskapen. Göteborg: Bokförlaget Korpen; 1987.Google Scholar
  69. Nørreklit L. Positivisme og samfundsvidenskab. Aalborg: Aalborg University; 1984.Google Scholar
  70. Parsons, T. et al (eds) Theories of Society. The Free Press, New York, NY 1965.Google Scholar
  71. Pfeffer J. Organizations and organization theory. Stanford: Stanford University; 1982.Google Scholar
  72. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The external control of organizations – resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row; 1978.Google Scholar
  73. Polkinghorne D. Methodology for the human sciences – system of inquiry. Albany: State University of New York Press; 1983.Google Scholar
  74. Reed M. Redirections in organizational analysis. London: Tavistock; 1985.Google Scholar
  75. Reed M, Hughes M, editors. Rethinking organization – new directions in organization theory and analysis. London: SAGE; 1992.Google Scholar
  76. Ritzer, G. “Fundamental eperspekitiver I sociologien: Fremad, Odense, 1970.Google Scholar
  77. Ritzer G. Fundamentale perspektiver i sociologien. Odense: Fremad; 1977.Google Scholar
  78. Schutz A. Hverdagslivets sociologi. København: Hans Reitzel; 1973b.Google Scholar
  79. Schutz A, Luckmann T. The structure of the life world. London: Heinemann; 1974.Google Scholar
  80. Scott WR. Developments in organization theory 1960–1980. Trends in theoretical models. In: Short Jr JF, editor. The state of sociology – problems and prospects. London; 1981.Google Scholar
  81. Scott WR. Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1987.Google Scholar
  82. Silverman D. The theory of organisations. London: Heinemann; 1983.Google Scholar
  83. Thompson JD. Hur organisationer fungerer (Organizations in actions, 1967). Stockholm: Prisma; 1971.Google Scholar
  84. Tørnebohm H. Paradigm i vetenskapernas värld och i vetenskapsteorin. Göteborgs Universitet, Avdelning för vetenskapsteori, nr 59; 1974.Google Scholar
  85. Tørnebohm H. Paradigms in Fields of Research. Göteborgs Universitet, Avdelning för vetenskapsteori (rapport. nr. 93); 1977.Google Scholar
  86. Van de Ven AH, Joyce WF. Overview of perspectives on organization design and behavior. In: Van de Ven AH, Joyce WF, editors. Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1981.Google Scholar
  87. Weick KE. The social psychology of organizing. Reading: Addison-Wesley Inc.; 1979a (1969).Google Scholar
  88. Williamson OE. Markets and hierarchies: analysis and anti-trust implications. New York: The Free Press; 1975.Google Scholar
  89. Winter SG. The research program of the behavioral theory of the firm: orthodox critique and evolutionary perspective. In: Gilad B, editor. Handbook of behavioral economics, vol. 1, Micro. Greenwich: JAI Press; 1986.Google Scholar
  90. Wittgenstein L. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Haslev: Samlarens Bogklub; 1993.Google Scholar
  91. von Wright GH. Vetenskap och förnuftet – ett försök till orientering. Stockholm: Månpocket; 1991.Google Scholar
  92. Zeitz G. Interorganizational dialectics. Adm Sci Q. 1980;25:72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Woodrow W. Clark II
    • 1
  • Michael Fast
    • 2
  1. 1.Pepperdine Graziadio Business School, Los Angeles and MalibuCaliforniaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Business and ManagementAalborg UniversityAalborgDenmark

Personalised recommendations